British exit from the European Union is the current [ July 2016 ] big issue in the Main Stream Media. That is because they are skating over the real big issue, which is Ethnic Fouling using Immigration by Third World aliens especially Illegal Immigration. The Referendum & its Post Script have been given the rather ugly name, Brexit. Having got the right decision on Referendum Day the next matters are how to get out and how to prevent Cameron and other Traitors blocking it or making sure it is on the worst possible terms. That is essentially what is being done to us now [ August 2018 ] - see This Is Brexit In Name Only To Keep The Plebs Happy on the point. NB Brexit Day Mark I is 29 March 2019, at 23:00Z.

The Wikipedia says: It officially took place at 23:00 GMT on 31 January 2020

UPDATE  November 2019
Various chancers made Comrade Corbyn foul up big time; he opted for a December election. Boris Johnson sees it as his chance for power and inflicting May's awful agreement on us. He invited Nigel Farage to go to the Devil; power sharing would cramp is style. The answer? Vote for the Brexit Party, against the Tories. NB Tory is the Irish word for thief. 

There is straightforward background at United Kingdom European Union membership referendum ex Wiki and the Withdrawal Agreement ex Wiki. Brexit Terms mean WTO terms unless we get screwed by May.

 The exit plan, Flexcit has been worked out by Richard A. E. North. It is rather good. It could all lead to Eurexit, back to the way it was. Pat Buchanan puts a view, asking Will There Always Be an England? It is the right question for the right reasons.

One issue that has been consistently ignored is how we came to find ourselves in this situation. The answer is Treason At Maastricht, which was set up Ted Heath, a fat Marxist with an unwholesome interest in choir boys and brown envelopes.

Unusually perceptive comment is at #The Base Gets Itself A New Elite

The legal attack on Democracy is being fronted by a Third World alien, a Sikh from Guyana Gina Miller, a Brazilian barber Deir Dos Santos and, hiding behind the scenes, a Jew Alan Miller. Andrew Joyce has something to say about the perpetrators - see Jews Are Leading the Legal Fight Against Brexit. One is Alex Chesterman; the Wikipedia does not admit that he is a Jew. The Jewish Business News does, implicitly at all events - see  Zoopla's founder Alex Chesterman execute with $34.2 million deal.


It is going to happen - sort of. Boris Johnson will betray us, just like Theresa May assisted by corrupt Mainstream Media. We will get BRINO, BRexit In Name Only.

Brexit Explained By Alan Johnson 
Alan Johnson felt that the EU Referendum and American Presidential election were best summed up in the lyrics of two popular songs. The Eagles' ‘Hotel California’ perfectly encapsulated the problem with Article 50 in the line, ‘You can check out any time you like but you can never leave.’ Then it was Mandy Miller’s seminal pop record of the 1950s, ‘Nellie the Elephant’, that predicted the 45th President of the United States: ‘Nellie the elephant packed her trunk and said goodbye to the circus, off she went with a trumpety trump, trump trump trump’.


Cameron, Treason & The Lisbon Treaty
A list of what will actually happen if we stay in the EU, and what has already been agreed. Twitter Thread from Lesley Miller Very good twitter thread HERE, explaining what remaining would actually lead to. If a second referendum happens, by highlighting what continued membership would cost, us Brexiteers will walk it. Have broken down the thread below but for more information, you will have to scroll through the actual tweets.
If you actually and really know all of these terms of the Lisbon treaty, signed on our behalf [ by Cameron ] without our approval, and knowing this you still believe we should remain, I feel sorry for your love of country.
“What will actually happen if we stay in the EU” is a question no remainer will ever answer but here it is warts and all.
Check it out if you wish ——>>
1: The UK along with all existing members of the EU lose their abstention veto in 2020 as laid down in the Lisbon Treaty when the system changes to that of majority acceptance with no abstentions or veto’s being allowed.
2: All member nations will become states of the new federal nation of the EU by 2022 as clearly laid out in the Lisbon treaty with no exceptions or veto’s.
3: All member states must adopt the Euro by 2022 and any new member state must do so within 2 years of joining the EU as laid down in the Lisbon treaty.
4: The London stock exchange will move to Frankfurt in 2020 and be integrated into the EU stock exchange resulting in a loss of 200,000 plus jobs in the UK because of the relocation. (This has already been pre-agreed and is only on a holding pattern due to the Brexit negotiations, which if Brexit does happen, the move is fully cancelled - but if not and the UK remains a member it’s full steam ahead for the move.)
5: The EU Parliament and ECJ become supreme over all legislative bodies of the UK.
6: The UK will adopt 100% of whatever the EU Parliament and ECJ lays down without any means of abstention or veto, negating the need for the UK to have the Lords or even the Commons as we know it today.
7: The UK will NOT be able to make its own trade deals.
8: The UK will NOT be able to set its own trade tariffs.
9 The UK will NOT be able to set its own trade quotas.
10: The UK loses control of its fishing rights
11: The UK loses control of its oil and gas rights
12: The UK loses control of its borders and enters the Schengen region by 2022 - as clearly laid down in the Lisbon treaty
13: The UK loses control of its planning legislation
14: The UK loses control of its armed forces including its nuclear deterrent
15: The UK loses full control of its taxation policy
16: The UK loses the ability to create its own laws and to implement them
17: The UK loses its standing in the Commonwealths
18: The UK loses control of any provinces or affiliated nations e.g.: Falklands, Cayman Islands, Gibraltar etc
19: The UK loses control of its judicial system
20: The UK loses control of its international policy
21: The UK loses full control of its national policy
22: The UK loses its right to call itself a nation in its own right.
23: The UK loses control of its space exploration program
24: The UK loses control of its Aviation and Sea lane jurisdiction
25: The UK loses its rebate in 2020 as laid down in the Lisbon treaty
26: The UK’s contribution to the EU is set to increase by an average of 1.2bn pa and by 2.3bn pa by 2020
This is the future that the youths of today think we stole from them?
They should be on their knees thanking us for saving them from being turned into Orwellian automatons
Do you think this is another huge step towards the New World Order, taken by Cameron with malice aforethought? Do you think that the Mainstream Media are keeping very quiet about our impending enslavement? Do you think it is a major act of Treason by the Establishment? Do you think Theresa May is keeping very quiet about it because she is an Enemy Of The People? Lots of people do - or would if they knew what is being snuck up on them.


This Is Brexit In Name Only To Keep The Plebs Happy
Are we being betrayed by Theresa May, the Remainer, is she incompetent or both? Given that she is betraying England by flooding us with Third World aliens, causing Ethnic Fouling & Genocide the Treason is obvious. Incompetent too? Possibly, even probably.


How To Negotiate With The EU
John Redwood explains well. Not the way that May is doing it is an obvious point. You doubt it? See the next one.


Is Theresa May Insane?
Hint: Yes.


Why So many Englishmen Want Out Of EU

Die Welt explains why, in German or does it? It was a vote against Third World immigration.


Leaving Europe
It sounds like a good idea to me. It sounds like a good idea to a lot of people all the way back in 2013. Politicians are different. Politicians have their snouts in the trough. If it ain't bribes it is blackmail, moral cowardice, stupidity, opportunism or even, just possibly treason. Now, in 2017 Brexit is coming to pass.

Various politicians claim that we cannot leave. They lie; that is what politicians do. Is perfectly possible as long as we have our own Army and our bomb.
The EU IN/OUT referendum: strategy and tactics for those who want to leave the EU.

We can't let Brexit be derailed by a City slicker and a Brazilian crimper
Sensible comment from Richard Littlejohn. This attack on Democracy is being led by a Jew, a Sikh and a Brazilian barber.


Arron Banks ex Wiki
Is a rich supporter of Brexit & UKIP as well as being lively. Left Wingers hate him, a distinct plus point. He reads as a Capitalist Swine with off shore companies.


Flexcit ex Wiki
Flexcit is the name of a policy which involves gradual British disengagement from the European Union.[1] Its original author and main proponent is Richard A. E. North. It was the official policy of Arron Banks' Leave EU campaign although the campaign did not get official recognition.

It is a sensible plan for gradual withdrawal but there is a problem, the Not Invented Here Syndrome aka sour grapes. Using it would obstruct the ill disposed, saboteurs et cetera. Doctor North says that a "dysfunctional Parliament" created the EU problem in the first place. He stops short of mentioning Treason At Maastricht but he does mention the profound ignorance of BBC journos. There is no comment on their corruption, Marxism or Homosexuality. Writing off the Foreign and Commonwealth Office as a problem not a solution is sensible. The Vienna Convention on Succession of  States in respect of Treaties 1978 should be applied although we are not a party to it.


The Leave campaign needs a credible Brexit plan
Give the Express a stick and it will inevitably embrace the wrong end of it with both hands. Only by this means could we get a front page story demanding that the Prime Minister – leader of the remain campaign – produce an EU exit plan. This is rather like expecting Rommel to produce a plan for clearing the Afrika Korps out of Egypt.

That said, we do of course need an exit plan but, as with any fundamental political change – the impetus must come from outside the bubble. Since the dawn of time – from Chartism, the welfare state and the Thatcher revolution – this has always been the case. 

And it is the abject failure of the "leave" campaign to embrace the only fully prepared exit plan in existence – or produce one of its own - which is proving to be its greatest, if not fatal weakness. 

After all, if the campaign does now have the courage and moral certainty to acquaint the voting public with its vision for a post-exit EU, and offer a credible plan for achieving it, why should anyone cast a vote for it in the referendum? 

Yet, despite the very obvious and desperately urgent need for a plan, there is no progress from the noise-makers. 

Farage and his GO monster is committed to political suicide by turning the referendum campaign into a debate on immigration, Arron Banks – after briefly showing a spark of courage – has retreated into his bunker, and the Cummings-Elliott duo have dug in their heels, determined that, whatever else their Titanic has, it won't be a structured exit plan. 

And there we are, as the two competitors for designation lock horns – neither are able to offer any credible leadership and neither are able to confront their own fundamental failings - we have the makings of an electoral disaster. 

Yesterday, at least, though, we had our final planning meeting in the Leave Alliance, preparatory to our launch on 16 March - budget day. We'll be at 1 Great George Street, in Westminster, starting at 2.30pm, when we'll also have copies of the short version of Flexcit

The event will be filmed and we'll place a professionally-edited video on YouTube clip, to go alongside the Flexcit pamphlet. And in April, we have plans for a workshop in London, further to roll out the plan. 

This at least will give Flexcit some more profile, then to make the media and noise-makers all the more absurd for ignoring it. Come what may, we're going ahead. If this referendum fails, it'll be none of our doing.


Democracy creates uncertainty, but Mark Carney’s fears will prove unfounded [ 9 March 2016  ]
Mark Carney, the Governor of the Bank of England, today described the prospect of a British secession from the European Union as the "biggest domestic financial stability risk" facing the UK. If Britain left the EU and could not secure the same business conditions for the City that it enjoys today, it would "without question" hit UK jobs and growth.

The success of a new relationship with the EU after leaving would depend on the "degree of mutual recognition enjoyed by the UK. Would the City be able to hold on the "passporting rights" that facilitates cross-border business in the European Economic Area, i.e. the EU plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein?

"There would be an impact. I can't give you a precise number in terms of institutions or jobs or activity, because we don't know where we would be on that continuum between full mutual recognition or pure third-country access."

There is little doubt that the markets may jitter at the prospect of the referendum, so Mark Carney is speaking the truth when he warns of uncertainty. This in itself is not a good enough reason not to hold one; democracy is necessarily uncertain at times.

HSBC previously warned it would relocate in the even of Brexit, until the board voted to remain in the UK in a decision that drew a line under almost a year of uncertainty over the future of Europe’s biggest bank. Banks and business do not like the prospect of change or the risks associated with the people expressing themselves democratically.

However, the reasons for HSBC remaining in the UK apply to every bank that warns it may relocate if Britain leaves the EU. Stuart Gulliver, HSBC’s chief executive, said HSBC's current location “delivers the best of both worlds to our stakeholders.” He added that said Britain’s “internationally recognised” regulatory framework and legal system, as well as its workforce, meant the UK should remain HSBC’s home.

There is in no perceivable advantage to leaving London; it is a first rate global city that will remain a global hub in or out of the EU. As for Britain’s “internationally recognised” regulatory framework, Britain has adopted global regulatory conventions made at the real top tables where the rules are made, and would do so in or out of the EU.

From a regulatory perspective, there is zero competitive advantage in moving away from London. Why relocate to mainland Europe in a post Brexit scenario? Nowhere would the business environment improve, there are no tax advantages to moving to Paris, thus it would be a waste of time and resources.

In any case, in order to secure the economy and de-risk Brexit in the event of a vote to leave, the Government will inevitably seek to retain access to the Single Market in a mutually beneficial negotiated settlement. The Market Solution is the optimal solution for alleviating risk, calming uncertainties and seceding from political and judicial union in an orderly fashion.

The mainstream Leave campaigns are making a mistake in not fully endorsing a negotiated secession that secures continued membership of the Single Market. The uncertainty and doubts of the market and the public would be significantly calmed by the acceptance on behalf of the Leave campaigns that our continued participation in the Single Market is inevitable and desirable. Alas, they lack vision.

Instead The Leave Alliance is the only campaign group that champions a staged exit with a soft landing, providing a platform to build our future on, as well as being the only campaign with a serious plan.

At the prospect of the UK retaining Single Market membership after leaving the EU Mark Carney expressed concerns. He stated that there would be questions over whether the UK would lose its "substantial influence" over the development of EU financial regulations and would retain the flexibility achieved in the renegotiation settlement secured by David Cameron.
Sir Jon Cunliffe, the Bank's deputy governor for financial stability, also raised points of concern when he claimed that if we wanted to remain in the single market for financial services, it would be a very big negotiating ask to also have the influence on setting the rules:

“So when you see how the EFTA (European Free Trade Association) counties participate – the Swiss and others in the rule setting – they’re consulted but they don’t have a say. It’s theoretically possible that a say could be negotiated, as I say we’re in unprecedented territory, but to me it’s not likely that we would be able to stay in the single market and have the influence on setting the rules that we have as a member of the European Union, if we were outside the EU.”
This is of course the standard criticism of the so-called “Norway option” that is commonly used to downplay the benefits of forging a relationship with the EU based on cooperation and trade alone.

As ever, there is an international elephant in the room. What Sir Jon Cunliffe chose to obscure is that the banking industry is global and so, increasingly, is its regulation. In fact, there has been what has been described as a “Cambrian explosion” in international regulatory co-operation which has transformed the regulatory environment. This means that pulling out of “Europe” would not make any difference to the trading environment – power is no longer geo-located in Brussels (if it ever was). Our EU parochialism is preventing us from seeing the bigger picture.

Conveniently, the extent of this transformation has been charted by the OECD and by researcher from Arizona State University. And in their documents we see this helpful chart (below) which sets out the structure of global financial regulation.
[ broken link ]

Readers will observe the focal position of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the remarkable number of organisations that make rules, set standards and co-ordinate regulation within this crucial field. But they will also note the relatively inconsequential position of the EU, which is a downstream organisation when it comes to framing regulation.

But this is all part of a much bigger picture, which goes under the classification International Regulatory Co-operation (IRC), as charted by the OECD. Not only has it recorded a staggering proliferation of organisations involved, the OECD, after an initiative launched in 2010 has identified eleven “mechanisms” of IRC, ranging from the formal and comprehensive to the informal and partial.

These run to harmonisation through rule-making by supranational or joint institutions such as the EU, treaties between states, regulatory “umbrella” partnerships such as the Canada-US Regulatory Cooperation Council, and intergovernmental organisations such as the ILO, OECD and WTO.

The territory also includes regional agreements on regulation such as APEC and UNECE, mutual recognition agreements, transgovernmental networks such as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, national requirements to consider international standards, incorporation of international standards in national law, soft law instruments and dialogue/information exchange among regulators and stakeholders (see diagram below). [ Access verboten - Editor ] 

The UK government is fully involved, as is the US government, where IRC is subject to a Presidential Executive Order, with action directed through the Office of Management and Budget. And it drives trade relations between the US and Canada.

Yet, while writ of IRC is dominating the global regulatory environment, it is almost completely invisible to the media, to most politicians and commentators. This means that most of what we are told is superficial to the point of misleading. The way we are governed has undergone a revolution – an invisible revolution – and the mass media is not even close to putting us in the picture.

Instead, it gives succour to the propagandists, who would have it that the “Europe” of which they know so little is one which is essential to UK trade, unwilling or unable to recognise that, in this changing world, we can live without the political ambitions of the EU and do better on the global stage.

The point they cannot seem to cope with is that globalisation has now advanced to such a stage that the original justification for having the EU running the European trading bloc has long since expired and we need to create a genuine European marketplace. “Europe” isn’t working, and we need now to look for a new settlement, of which IRC is a major part.

If we leave the EU, the banks won’t flee, London will remain a foremost global city and Britain will embrace an outward looking vision. There is a global Single market emerging, and we need to be fully engaged with it.


Repealing the European Communities Act is not an option [ Tuesday 8 March 2016 ]

There are far too many bad ideas and redundant arguments coming from the Leave camp and they need to be neutralised in order to maximise our chance of success. They actively contribute to the fear, uncertainty and doubt that is so easily stoked in the public.

Of these, there are few more irresponsible that the misguided notion that the UK could “simply” amend the 1972 European Communities Act to end its political union with the EU. To be clear, an Article 50 notification is the only legal and viable means of leaving the European Union and it is the only method which obliges the EU to negotiate a settlement. It is therefore the only method the Government will countenance. At the very least this is part of the debate that should be settled for good.

Repealing the 1972 European Communities Act would be a hostile action and an exercise in self-harming; we would be unilaterally breaking with our treaty obligations with terrible consequences. The UK’s reputation would be in tatters as it renders itself an international pariah that can’t be relied upon to meet its obligations.

Crucially, repeal of the 1972 Act would be a venture of domestic law only. Our treaty obligations would remain intact, thus failure to live up to them would be actionable. So, while we are entangled in a very messy and destructive political and legal dispute with the EU we would be trading under WTO rules only, having broken our treaty obligations and failed to make any specific trading arrangements.

So what about all the mutual recognition of standards and agreements on non-tariff barriers? Almost immediately the EU would erect tariff barriers. Not out of spite, but because it has a common external tariff. That is simply the legal default.

The Single Market is defined as a Regional Trade Agreement (RTA), and as an RTA it is permitted under trading rules to discriminate against countries who are not members. If we left the EU to trade under WTO rules only we would acquire the status of “Most Favoured Nation” (MFN) with the EU. According to the rules of the WTO system the EU would be obliged to impose the same tariffs under the same conditions as all other countries that enjoy MFN status. So for certain sectors overnight we would face the disadvantage of higher tariffs.

At the same time, we must follow the standards and rules of entry for products exported into the Single Market as a WTO member. An RTA can decide the rules of entry for all products intended for its market and refuse entry to those which fail to comply. Having eschewed a negotiated settlement via Article 50, our products would fail to conform and be blocked from the marketplace, while we could not do the same in retaliation.

The UK would not be able to retaliate and refuse entry to products from the EU (as long as they meet international standards) because we are not an RTA, and therefore we are not permitted to discriminate. The disadvantages for the UK are significant and obvious. We could be discriminated against with no legal means of retaliation.

Our exports would be disrupted as we could find certain sectors barred from EU trade due to our inability to conform to a particular standards, leaving goods stranded at ports awaiting approval. The WTO recognises Non Tariff Barriers as the largest restricting factor on international trade, where many countries raise particular standards codes to keep out international competition and protect domestic producers. This is why we cannot just unilaterally sever treaties, reject negotiation and rely on WTO rules alone.

We have explained in greater detail why trading solely under WTO rules is not a realistic or viable option here. In layman terms, it would be an economic catastrophe.

This is the reality of “simply” repealing the European Communities Act 1972; it would be a political and economic disaster that would leave our reputation and our economy in tatters. This is why it is not an option on the table and no one in the Leave movement should waste another moment considering it or advocating it. Failing to meet our obligations and breaking treaties is unthinkable and thoroughly un-British.

The purpose of Brexit is not to cut ourselves off from the EU, or to turn our backs and isolate ourselves, or to act out in hostility. What we seek is a new relationship with the EU based on cooperation, not subordination. In order to get that, we will have to act in good faith and the spirit of cooperation to ensure that our secession is managed sensibly, to the benefit of all parties.

Read Flexcit: The Market Solution to leaving the EU

08/03/2016 link

Expats Have Nothing To Fear From Brexit Friday 4 March 2016  
Two million UK citizens working abroad could become illegal immigrants overnight if Britain were to leave the European Union according to remain fear mongers playing fast and loose with the facts . This is one of the more flimsy and morally objectionable deceits given that it is designed to disseminate anxiety amongst the expat community and in many cases this myth is proliferated by people who should, and probably do, know better.

The status of treaty rights acquired while a treaty is in force, when that treaty comes to an end, was dealt with in a 2013 Parliamentary briefing, and is covered in much more detail by UN lawyers. A clarification has even been issued via a House of Commons Library note, which stated:
“Generally speaking, withdrawing from a treaty releases the parties from any future obligations to each other, but does not affect any rights or obligations acquired under it before withdrawal.”
The (1969) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties is clear, in article 70.1.b it states that a termination of a treaty:
“Does not affect any right, obligation or legal situation of the parties created through the execution of the treaty prior to its termination.”
To summarise, “acquired rights” – also known as “executed rights” or “vested rights” – do continue to apply to individuals. So firm are they embedded in the international order that they have acquired the status of “customary law”, which means the principle does not need to be anchored by any particularly treaty, but stands alone as a fundamental principle of international law.

Thus, should it come to the UK leaving the EU, those persons who currently live in other EU member states, invoking the right to remain under the “freedom of movement” or “freedom of establishment” provisions of the treaties, will be able to retain that “acquired right”. There may be some details around the margins that have to be settled which will make up part of secession negotiations, in both informal talks that begin in the aftermath of a vote to leave, and formal talks that begin after our Article 50 notification.

The issue is settled. Spreading fear amongst expats is now the reserve of barrel scraping social media campaigners, with even Europhile think tank British Influence conceding the lack of credibility to this argument:

“General principles of EU law concerning legitimacy and legal certainty as laid down in the Treaty of Lisbon presuppose that the UK and the EU would be required, or at least strongly recommended by civil servants, diplomats and government lawyers, to agree on the protection of acquired rights…”

The report concludes that it is likely a transitional agreement will be achieved, but even if one did not materialise, or if the transitional agreement had problematic “gaps”, acquired rights are covered my international law:

“International law should be sufficient to protect acquired rights. For example, under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, while parties to a treaty can be released from future obligations by withdrawing from the agreement, rights and obligations acquired under the same treaty are not affected".

Stop lying to expats. They have nothing to fear from Brexit.

04/03/2016 link

BMW have no right to interfere - and no credibility

Rolls-Royce CEO, Torsten Muller-Otvos, has sent a letter to BMW employees on Britain's EU referendum as though who governs us were any of his business. A copy of the letter was released to the media. Here we analyse the key points.
"Free trade is important for international business. Rolls-Royce Motor Cars exports motor cars throughout the EU and imports a significant number of parts through the region. For BMW Group, more than half of MINIs built and virtually all the engines and components made in the UK are exported to the EU, with over 150,000 new cars and many hundreds of thousands of parts imported from Europe each year. Tariff barriers would mean higher costs and higher prices and we cannot assume that the UK would be granted free trade with Europe from outside the EU. 

Actually we can assume free trade. That is actually the whole point of the Lisbon Treaty Article 50 negotiations. Both parties know full well that erecting tariff and non-tariff barriers has harmful consequences for both sides and runs anti-ethical to what both the EU and the WTO stand for. In this, we see that forty years of integration are not so easily unpicked. 

With that in mind we know that a bespoke agreement cannot be delivered inside the allotted two years and nobody has any interest in it dragging on. And so it is entirely reasonable to assume that our government would seek to use as many existing legal instruments as possible to ensure the settlement was as close to EU membership as possible. Not least because no Westminster party actually wants to leave the EU.

It is therefore next to certain that we would continue as a member of the single market while leaving the political EU construct. At the very worst, if talks fail, we end up with a mutual recognition agreement and a free trade agreement along the lines of the Australian path. Not immediately optimal, but certainly no doomsday scenario. As authors of the most comprehensive Brexit plan in circulation, it is our best estimation that the Norway Option would be stage one of the exit process. Is that really so bad? That brings us neatly to the next point:

"When it comes to regulation, whether the UK remains inside the EU or leaves it, with Europe as the UK's largest export market by far, we would have to abide by European rules and regulations in any case. We believe it's much better to be sat at the table when regulations are set and have a hand in their creation, rather than simply having to accept them.

Does Torsten Muller-Otvos realise that they are no longer made by the EU? When we actually look at where they do come from, we find our old friend UNECE looming large. Its Transport Division, based in Geneva, provides secretariat services to the World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations (WP.29), and has been doing so for more than 50 years.

By its own account, the World Forum incorporates into its regulatory framework the technological innovations of vehicles relating safety and environment impact. WP 29 was established on June 1952 as "Working party of experts on technical requirement of vehicles". The current name was adopted in 2000. 

As to a little bit of detail, the core of the Forum's work is based around the "1958 Agreement", known formally as "Agreement concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions". This was augmented by a further Agreement in 1998. 

As helpfully explained here, these form a legal framework wherein participating countries (contracting parties) agree a common set of technical prescriptions and protocols for type approval of vehicles and components.

The UNECE instruments, produced under the Agreements, are classic "diqules". As quasi-legislation, they have no mandatory effect until converted into laws by the territorial bodies signatory to the agreements (contracting parties).

Despite that, they used to be called "UNECE Regulations" or, less formally, "ECE Regulations". Since many non-European countries are now contracting parties to the Agreements, the regulations are now officially entitled "UN Regulations". Through this, each contracting party's type approvals are recognised by all other contracting parties.

There are currently 57 signatories to the Agreements, including non-EU countries such as Norway and the major vehicle manufacturing countries of Japan and South Korea. And the EU is also a part, having acceded via Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997 and Council Decision 2000/125/EC of 31 January 2000.

And now for the interesting bits. When it comes dealing with the World Forum, we see this interesting report. The European Commission on behalf of EU Member States, it says, seeks "continuously increase their involvement in the Geneva technical legislative process, in particular by working within WP.29 and its subsidiary bodies in order to ensure harmonisation between UNECE Regulations and EU legislation". 

As a result, we thus discover that the EU's own major regulations on the general safety of motor vehicles have been replaced with UN Regulations. They aren't EU regulations any more. They might have an EU label on them by the time they get to us, but they're made in Geneva, not Brussels. 

Dealing with UNECE, of course, is part of trade policy – part of the Single Market, so the EU takes change. Graciously, the EU Commission allows Member States take part in the preparatory work of the UNECE working parties. 

If it becomes obvious at this stage, they kindly EU tells us, that further discussions between experts are necessary, an informal working group may be set up within a working party with a view to making progress in the development of the Regulations. This may occur where there is a rapid development of complex new technologies. And we can even take part in these informal groups.

However, when it comes finally to agreeing the standards proposed by UNECE, the Member States have to take the back seat. The European Commission, it says firmly, "exercises the right to vote in WP.29 on behalf of the EU and its 27 Member States". Thus, despite the UK having major vehicle manufacturing interests, producing its 1.58 million cars in 2012, we have no direct vote on vehicle standards. We do not have a seat at the table.

Just in case you might ask, yes Norway – as a full member of UNECE - takes part in the World Forum. As an independent nation, it represents itself in the committees and votes on its own behalf. Despite having no indigenous manufacturing industry, it takes an active part in the proceedings.

More to the point, as a multinational company, BMW and the like operate at levels far higher than nations and blocs, and since it is more that just the EU who adopts the rules, their self-interest is not in any way threatened.

"Finally, we get a significant benefit from the easy movement of our people between the UK and Europe. This allows the rapid transfer of expert knowledge throughout Rolls-Royce Motor Cars and BMW Group networks, building the skill level of our UK workforce. Our employment base could also be affected, with skilled men and women from most EU countries included in the 30 nationalities currently represented at the Home of Rolls-Royce here at Goodwood.

Put simply, there is no real reason why would should expect that visaless access (as existed before the EEC) would not be part of the EU negotiations, and since we most certainly would want it, the EU would likely leverage it to full EEA freedom of movement in any case. Most serious analysts think that leaving the single market in the first stage of Brexit would be improbably and politically difficult, as outlined in the Daily Telegraph. It's not realistic to believe that we would quit the EEA.  

What we're looking at here is pure propaganda shrouded in ignorance. The EU is not the single market and trade is not contingent on political subjugation. Torsten Muller-Otvos has no right to interfere or even attempt to influence the votes of UK employees. Morally, it is bankrupt.

03/03/2016 link

We're making progress
Wednesday 2 March 2016

But for the diehards wedded to long held beliefs it feels to us like the campaign has reached a turning point today as we are now seeing a far more serious public debate about the Brexit options.
We have looked at the folly of the WTO Option just recently here at The Leave Alliance (TLA), then today we get a fairly comprehensive demolition job from the former president of Switzerland on why the Swiss option is not much cop. It echoes much of what we have said in our comprehensive Brexit plan
And then we get Norwegian Prime Minister saying of her country's place outside the EU: "We lack influence in important decision making processes in the EU" - but in practice we know this to be something of a lie in that Norway chairs a number of global regulatory committees (from which the EU receives its own rules) and has its own free vote and right of opt-out at the WTO. 

It should also be noted that Erna Solberg is a foaming europhile. Speaking to the BBC's Ben Wright she says "I would prefer it if Norway was a full member of the EU" - yet every polls sees the Norwegians overwhelmingly rejecting EU membership. Were another party in office in Norway right now we would be hearing distinctly different noises. Put simply, the lady is just as much out of touch as our own politicians. 

Adding some much needed clarity we get Ben Kelly of The Sceptic Isle (and deputy editor, TLA) writing in the Telegraph, explaining that the Norway Option is most likely the path of least resistance for protecting access to the single market, thus it will be the direction of travel for negotiators. It kills the scaremongering stone dead. 

While we fully accept an EEA/Norway deal still means we pay into the EU budget and doesn't mean immediate deregulation, it means we pay a lot less, and it means we get control of fishing and agriculture back along with energy policy. That in and of itself is worth having. 

There are limitations to this option, but as we continue to spell out, Brexit is a process not an event. There are pitfalls, but also a great many freedoms and future opportunities. Adding our weight to Efta, we then have sufficient clout and leverage to renegotiate the EEA agreement at a later date, including freedom of movement, which is due for review anyway. 

Those are negotiations we would never get remaining in the EU, especially not after this referendum and the sham reforms of David Cameron. 

While diehards will probably be disappointed by some of the compromises, that's probably no bad thing. Politics is usually going wrong if the head bangers are satisfied. The point is that the EEA provides us with a safe departure lounge so we can take as much time as we need to untangle ourselves from the EU mess. It can't immediately satisfy everybody's criteria, but at the very least, we are out of the EU and on the road to something better. What's not to like?

02/03/2016 link

Could Peter Mandelson be any more offensive?
[ Probably not but then he is a Jew on the make - Editor ]
Tuesday 1 March 2016

In his first intervention in the referendum debate, Peter Mandelson, the Labour peer and former Trade Commissioner, claims that the UK could not only lose access to the single European market but could also lose the EU’s preferential trading status in foreign markets if the UK pulls out of the European Union. He also asserts that British exporters would face trade tariffs of up to 20 per cent on goods such as cars, whisky, pharmaceuticals and fashion sold around the world.

In retaliation, he warns, the UK might also have to raise tariffs on imported goods – pushing up the cost of foreign imports – while new trade deals are agreed. This he claim “would be harder” than those in favour of Brexit think, as after years in the EU the UK has “no real trade negotiating capacity”.

Now, unless Lord Mandelson's appointment to the EU was largely a political sinecure to keep him out of the way (we couldn't possibly comment), it is unlikely that a man of his stature and reputed intelligence could be this ignorant. From an MP or MEP, perhaps yes, we could write it off as run of the mill stupidity, but not so here. What we are looking at here is a grotesque distortion. 

Firstly we note that magic word "could". If we leave the EU, all sorts of things could happen, but in this case, the probability of such occurring is next to, if not, absolute zero. 

The only way this could happen is if we left the single market as well as the EU and left unilaterally without invoking Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. To do that would require a repeal of Section 2 of the European Communities Act, which last time we checked requires one of those parliamentary vote things. Given how obviously suicidal this is, nobody sane would propose it, and if they did, parliament would rightly block it. 

That means we will leave via Article 50. For tariffs to go up, we would have to leave the EU without first having secured a free trade deal. Mandelson has it that the UK has “no real trade negotiating capacity” - which is wholly offensive - but if that is true then it speaks to just how corrosive our EU membership is.

But then the whole point of leaving by Article 50 (apart from it being the legal instrument we've agreed to) is that it is the only instrument that compels the EU to negotiate an exit settlement. In this, it is more than reasonable to assume that neither the EU nor the UK wants to see an end to the relationship on less than amicable terms. To leave without a trade agreement at the very least would cause a toxic shock that would have far reaching ramifications for both parties, as well as knocking confidence in the still fragile Euro.

Therefore, we start from the position that all parties are negotiating in good faith, will necessarily be risk averse, and will seek to conclude an agreement as quickly as possible to remove uncertainty. Everybody wants this done with the least amount of fuss, the least amount of uncertainty and maximum continuity of trade. 

As many have now pointed out, including Mandelson, a bespoke agreement inside two years (as mandated under Article 50) is just not going to happen. That means, we will look at as many existing legal constructs as possible. The EU will not be keen to replicate the tangled mess of the Switzerland model, nor will it be in any hurry to engineer any special UK exemptions lest it precipitate more member states voting to leave the EU.

In that regard, it is most likely that the European Economic Area will be the default option. It addresses the matter of leaving the EU while ensuring continuity, while requiring no special exemptions not already enjoyed by non-EU EEA members. That means the single market is protected. 
This will likely be accepted without challenge in that as much as neither side wants any headaches, it will also be negotiated by a government that doesn't actually want to leave - so will opt for the relationship that most resembles EU membership.

But this is all familiar territory to those who have read our comprehensive Brexit plan. What makes us double-take is a subtlety in Mandelson's words where he says the "UK might also have to raise tariffs on imported goods – pushing up the cost of foreign imports – while new trade deals are agreed". This makes us wonder whether Lord Mandelson is actually startlingly ignorant as well as dishonest. 

The point being that we do not actually leave the EU until Article 50 negotiations are concluded and a settlement ratified. Therefore there is no gap between EU membership and the new settlement. Moreover, we are able to rely on the principle in international law of presumption of continuity - as he of all people should know. We retain third party agreements. 

In any case, the EU has a common external tariff that it must apply to all non-EEA members (his scenario). If we matched it in reciprocation, as Mandelson suggests, under WTO non-discrimination rules, we have to impose tariffs on all our other trading partners worldwide. That creates havoc, so we end up not imposing tariffs on the EU while they impose tariffs on us. That is why unilateral withdrawal would not be on the table - and that is why there is really no such thing as the WTO Option. It's just not an option whichever side suggests it. 

And so, making estimations broadly in line with the political realities, with single market access intact, there is no justifiable reason to give credence to anything Lord Mandelson has said. Put simply, he is a liar using the prestige of his former title to distort the debate and deceive voters. It's easy to see how he was the architect of New Labour - who took political lying to new heights and pioneered it to an art form.
But then having gone through this process of elimination we can now say that an off-the-shelf solution is the most realistic and politically achievable - and we can dispense with all the silly scaremongering about what could happen. Stronger In repeats the claim that we don't know what out looks like. Well as it happens, it rather looks like we do. 
What it does mean is that we retain freedom of movement, we still pay into the EU budget (albeit considerably less) and we get no immediate deregulation. That said, it means we get control of fishing and agriculture back along with energy and environment policy, a veto on new rules and regulations and as per the whole point of this exercise, we are out of the EU. 

There are limitations to this option, but as we continue to spell out, Brexit is a process not an event. There are pitfalls, but also a great many freedoms and future opportunities. Over the coming months, we will be outlining what those are. 

While this will not immediately satisfy Brexit hardliners, they should note that in the first instance we would be out of the EU, and out from under the rule of what is essentially the supreme government for Europe. That alone would be reason to celebrate. But it doesn't stop there. 
Adding our weight to Efta, we then have sufficient clout and leverage to renegotiate the EEA agreement at a later date, including freedom of movement, where we would be kicking at an open door. Those are negotiations we would never get while we remain in the EU, especially not after this referendum and the sham reforms of David Cameron.   

Voters’ Remorse, or The Morning After the Night Before
Everybody in British politics is in shock now that that they face the reality of having to negotiate the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union. In the case of Boris Johnson, a charming opportunist who took the leadership of the Brexit campaign in the hope of succeeding David Cameron as prime minister, the prospect of having to lead those negotiations was so frightening that he simply froze up.

That gave Michael Gove, co-leader of the Brexit campaign, an excuse to stab Boris in the back and supplant him as the main Leave candidate for the Conservative leadership, which he duly did on Thursday morning. Gove is a true believer, but he lacks Johnson’s charisma, so the next Conservative prime minister is actually likelier to be Theresa May – who supported the Remain campaign.

If most Conservative members of parliament are terrified by the outcome of the referendum, that is even more true for ordinary pro-Brexit voters..........

One thing all the contenders for the prime ministerial job agree on is Britain should not start negotiating its exit now. Recognising this, Cameron promised to stay in office until October to give the Conservative Party time to find a new leader – and promised NOT to invoke Article 50 of the Lisbon treaty during that time.
Gwynne Dyer writes, often well. His article makes sense until he mentions our remorse. It is news to me & I suspect lots of others. Cameron's treachery is very much what one expects from a corrupt War Monger; it's what we got.


The Meaning Of Brexit [ 23 June 2016 ]
Gilad Atzmon explains it; showing that 'Right' & 'Left' are different terms for the same gang of corrupt manipulators.


Ten Ways To Leave EU, Scenarios For Brexit [ 23 June 2016 ]
Yes, it is all unsettled. Mr MacDonald does not mention we 'joined' by Treason At Maastricht & that we are fully entitled to walk away. The American Declaration of Independence applies just as much to England as America. Honest government [ an alien concept ] has the Consent Of The Governed. WE have the Right Of Revolution.


Will The Tories Betray The Brexit Revolution? [ 2 July 2016 ]
For once, the clichés are justified. We really do stand at a momentous juncture as a nation. The decisions made in the next few months will determine the path we take post-Brexit. Will we take a bold leap, or will we take the timid, tepid, half-hearted path, row back to a “Brexit-lite”, squandering what really is a once in a century opportunity?

To say “we”, of course, is incorrect: unlike the brave Brexit decision made by the British people as a whole, the path it now takes will depend entirely on the internal politics of the Tory Party, an institution with a somewhat dubious history when it comes to putting the nation before its own needs.

Let us look at the situation cynically from the point of view of Tory self-interest. There are four years to go to an election and the Opposition is in meltdown. No other challenger is likely to arise. However Brexit is not without considerable short-term risk. Rather than do what is best for the country fifteen or twenty years hence, how do you ensure your domination for the foreseeable future?

Firstly, one imagines there have been some rather interesting phone conversations from major Tory corporate donors over the last few days to the various likely leadership candidates. Shocked and panicked by the threat of removal from the single market, a great deal of pressure will brought to bear by vested interests to ensure such very agreeable arrangements continue: free movement of cheap labour, crony capitalism via the Brussels regulatory regime and, of course, tariff free access to the EU market..........

In essence, the future of our country relies entirely on whether the Tory Party can rise to the Brexit challenge.
There is no mention of horse trading or Jews, just rich donors but it is somewhat realistic.


Denmark Wants A Referendum Too [ 2 July 2016 ]
DANISH politicians are urging its government to hold a referendum after Britain’s decision to leave the European Union.

The Danish People's Party (DPP) and the Red-Green Alliance (RGA) have renewed the demand for a vote on the Scandinavian nation’s membership of the Euro-bloc after the Leave camp’s success

Leader of DPP, Kristian Thulesen Dahl, said Brussels had made its bed by underestimating the looming scepticism in Europe and now the Danish people must be given a chance to follow Britain out of the EU. The right-wing politician said: “This shows that once against the EU completely underestimates people’s scepticism. The EU has made its bed.

“I also believe Danes should of course have a referendum on whether we want to follow Britain or stay in the EU.”.........

The demand for a Danish referendum comes as far-right National Front leader Marine Le Pen called for a French vote on EU membership. As the final results revealed Britain could cut ties with Brussels this morning, the French politician repeated her previous calls for a “Frexit”. She tweeted: “Victory to liberty! As I have been demanding for many years, we now need the same referendum in France and EU countries.”
Asking people what they want is an idea. We could call it Democracy. Didn't they try it once in Athens? Perhaps it isn't the way to go. Wonderful politicians know how to run our lives better than we do, don't they? Isn't that why they imported millions of Third World foreigners to do the dirty work - and rape our daughters?


Andrea Leadsom Pledges Britain Would Be On Fast-Track To Brexit  [ 4 July 2016 ]
It can be done. Andrea Leadsom says she can and will. It is a power bid but probably a sincere one.


Liam Fox Says No Brexit For THREE YEARS As He Rules Out Deal For EU Migrants In PM Pledge  [ 4 July 2016 ]
Liam Fox, a comedian with light fingers can do a Brexit on the worst possible terms.


Brexit & Jews [ 1 July 2016 ]


So many Jews flock to 'Left Wing' causes but they are just means to an end, to the supremacy of Jews. Their Useful Idiots believe in superior rights for Third World aliens, Feminism, Homosexuals, White Guilt et cetera. Jews are not that stupid; they have their eyes firmly on the main chance because they are shamelessly Racist. That is why the Jew Alderman explicitly asked “Will Brexit be good for us Jews?


Belgium Offers An Olive Branch To Brexit's Friends Calling For A North Sea Union [ 24 August 2016 ]
Belgium is a nation of shop keepers too. They want trade too. Going through there means bypassing Calais and 9,000 vicious Third World invaders.


After Brexit, Ask Not What This Country Can Do For Immigrants, But What Immigrants Can Do For This Country [ 3 September 2016 ]
The Telegraph asks the right question for once. Ask what they do to England or look at the next reports to know.


MPs Try To Block Brexit [ 11 October 2016 ]
Second guessing British public is NOT acceptable' May rules out allowing MPs Brexit vote
THERESA MAY has ruled out a vote for MPs on Brexit with Downing Street insisting Parliament should not be allowed to “second-guess” the will of the British people.

The Prime Minister has been accused of “Tyranny” by ignoring the House of Commons as she pushes ahead with negotiating Britain’s exit from the EU. Over the weekend it also emerged former Labour leader Ed Miliband has held secret talks with Remain-supporting Tories in a bid to force a parliamentary vote on the terms of Brexit.

But while Downing Street today insisted MPs will be allowed to “scrutinise” the exit process, a vote for MPs on Brexit appeared to be dismissed.
The rogues alleging Tyranny are proving their hatred of Democracy when they don't get their own way.


Thornberry Obstructing Brexit [ 12 October 2016 ]
EMILY Thornberry MP was slapped down by Tory MP Bernard Jenkin for arguing the House of Commons should have the final say on any Brexit deal instead of the elected Government. Bernard Jenkin hit back at the Shadow Foreign Secretary's flimsy proposal that the House of Commons should sign off on any Brexit deal.

Defending the mandate for any Brexit deal the Government may strike, Mr Jenkin said it was "the biggest ever vote cast for any single proposition in this country, ever"......... Emily Thornberry claimed pre-Brexit promises were 'contradictory' However the Labour MP claimed she was "frustrated" by the lack of information Parliament had received on Brexit talks...........

Ms Thornberry – one of the MPs who decided to serve [ sic i.e. make a power grab - Editor ] in Corbyn's cabinet despite mass resignations earlier this year – said voters were not given a clear direction on what type of Brexit they were getting during the referendum.
Thornberry is a fat, ugly lump on the make; one that despises the honest English Working Man. She joined the Labour Party because she saw more mileage in it. Then she proved her contempt for principle by joining Comrade Corbyn.
PS Only 96% agree that it is not her business: that WE decided democratically. She hates Democracy; she wants power.


World Trade Boss Working For Quick, Smooth Brexit [ 28 October 2016 ]
HOPES of a rapid departure from the EU were significantly raised last night after the head of the World Trade Organisation vowed to "work hard" for a "fast and smooth" Brexit.

Roberto Azevedo, director general of the governing body for global trade rules, insisted the UK would suffer no "vacuum or disruption" on breaking ties with Brussels. 

And he recognised that the referendum vote for leaving the European bloc was not an "anti-trade" gesture [ Quite right; it was anti-Third World invaders - Editor ].  

And it came as a major new report warned that British businesses and taxpayers would hammered by massive new costs for bailing-out the crisis stricken euro if the country remains part of the EU Single Market.
Recall that we were told loudly, repeatedly that we needed to join the euro. They were wrong. We were lied to about the need to join the European Union; it was government propaganda. Out means freedom.


Her Majesty's   [ 3 November 2016 ]
This case is an attack on genuine Democracy, as distinct from the representative sort, which it is so much easier to pervert by bribery, blackmail or what ever. It pretty much proves that the law is a crap shoot. Her Majesty's Government can override the court if it wants.


Jew Used Third World Alien To Front Attack On Brexit And Democracy [ 4 November 2016 ]
The Jew Alan Miller used Gina Miller a Sikh from Guyana as his front woman to attack the clearly stated will of the people in the Referendum on Brexit but then, of course Jews hate democracy. Miller looks like a White Man; lots of Jews do. It makes their treachery easier to perpetrate.

Recall that Michael Foster, another rich Jew infiltrated The Labour Party in order to control it, to get rid of Jeremy Corbyn because Jeremy is naive enough to think that Palestinians have the human right not to be murdered or harassed by Jews. His legal action failed. NB Foster was the Managing Director of Carlton Television & a colleague of David Cameron ex-leader of the Conservative Party; his business, like his politics  just part of his tribal loyalty to  Zionist crazies, vicious rogues like Netanyahu, the thug who runs Israel, an area full of Hard Left Socialist Jews. See e.g. Rich Jew Abuses Comrade Corbyn's Inner Circle As Nazis..
PS Foster used Mishcon de Reya as his solicitors; they are also Jews.


Jews Are Leading the Legal Fight Against Brexit
Andrew Joyce fingers Mischon de Reya [ Jews ], Alex Chesterman [ Jew ], David Pannick QC [ Jew ], Brian Leveson [ Jew ], Terence Etherton [ homosexual Jew ], Philip Sales [ Jew ], Anthony Julius [ Jew ] but misses Alan Miller.


Black Alien Will Vote Against Brexit [ 18 November 2016 ]
Lammy [ an MP in Parliament ] alleges that it is his conscience. Others would say that he is an enemy alien making trouble and excuses. Perhaps we should just settle for another of the Enemy Within like Blair, Brown, Cameron, Cox et al.


Third World Alien Fronting Brexit Attack Gets Gobby With Michael Gove [ 22 November 2016 ]
She is being used as tool by Zionist crazies, the Puppet Masters e.g. Alan Miller. Jews are attacking Brexit, attacking Democracy. They prefer Representative democracy; perverting it, perverting MPs is so much easier. Gilad Atzmon, an honest Jew said that Jews Buy All Western Politicians For Less Than One Main Battle Tank. I think don't come quite so cheap but he is very much on the right lines.


Lord Palmerston Sums Up All That Brexit Is About [ 25 November 2016 ]
Lord Palmerston:  “I hold with respect to alliances, that England is a Power sufficiently strong, sufficiently powerful, to steer her own course, and not to tie herself as an unnecessary appendage to the policy of any other Government. I hold that the real policy of England—apart from questions which involve her own particular interests, political or commercial—is to be the champion of justice and right; pursuing that course with moderation and prudence, not becoming the Quixote of the world, but giving the weight of her moral sanction and support wherever she thinks that justice is, and wherever she thinks that wrong has been done…I say that it is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow…  And if I might be allowed to express in one sentence the principle which I think ought to guide an English Minister, I would adopt the expression of Canning, and say that with every British Minister the interests of England ought to be the shibboleth of his policy.”
Speech to the House of Commons (1 March 1848).
This applies to the systematic importation of Third World aliens, the firmly held policy of Her Majesty's Government and Her Allegedly Loyal Opposition. In fact Her Majesty's Government Is Rotten. The other lot are worse.


Arrogant Third World Alien Attacking Brexit Says We Are Too Stupid To Have The Vote  [ 29 November 2016 ]
Miller is a mouthy ratbag being used to manipulate us by Jews See e.g. Jew Used Third World Alien To Front Attack On Brexit And Democracy


Withdrawal from the European Union (Article 50) Bill 2016-17 [ 8 December 2016 ]
This Bill is due for a Second Reading on 16 December unless it is preempted by events. It will give us an opportunity to see which MPs are Enemies Of The People,, who votes against it and against us. The Referendum was about Democracy, the will of the people. Parliament is about Representative Democracy, about which 'representative' is stupid, wrongheaded, bribed, blackmailed, whatever. The Bill is short, to the point and at Withdrawal from the European Union (Article 50) Bill (HC Bill 104). It should be redundant because we were forced into European Union by Treason At Maastricht. We are entitled to leave by Revolution or just a declaration.


Lawyer Defying Democracy & Brexit [ 10 December 2016 ]
Embittered Remain campaigners are seeking to get EU judges to rule Brexit can be cancelled in a fresh attempt to defy the will of the people. Europhile lawyers will today launch new proceedings in Ireland that could [ sic ] pave the way for Britain’s departure being abandoned after the two-year formal exit process has been started. The pro-EU campaigners will bypass the British courts as they believe the Irish judiciary will be more likely to refer the case the European Court of Justice – putting key decisions on Britain’s withdrawal in the hands of judges in Luxembourg...........

Jolyon Maugham QC, a barrister who is leading the legal bid, said he wanted to give voters the opportunity to ‘change their minds’............

The 45-year-old tax barrister is hoping to ‘crowdfund’ £70,000 in donations to pay for the action that will begin in the Irish courts as soon as the money is raised.
You just might feel that Maugham is running another get rich quick scheme and that he is an arrogant rogue - see the mug shot, one who despises the huddled peasant masses & Democracy. The first legal attack, in the High Court was set up by a Jew then fronted by a Third World alien - see Jew Used Third World Alien To Front Attack On Brexit And Democracy. So is the one in the Supreme Court.


European Politicians Don't Like Theresa May [ 17 December 2016 ]
Theresa May said 'I think I better leave now' at a Brussels summit after EU leaders refused to discuss Brexit negotiations in front of her.............  

Mrs May's attempt to spark a discussion was met with silence from the other 27 EU leaders, who waited for her to leave the room so they could talk about their own plans for the negotiations [ i.e. how to rob us blind again - Editor ]..........

The Prime Minister returned to the UK without dinner after the tense summit, which saw EU leaders threaten Britain with a Brexit divorce bill of up to £50billion, including payments to cover pensions for EU staff...............

In his first evidence session with the Brexit committee, Mr Davis said it was not his job to set immigration policy only to regain complete control over it.
European politicians are not the Enemy Within but they are Enemies Of The People - in Europe too. The Daily Mail's readers are on side.


Chancellor Shocks Germans Regarding Brexit [ 17 January 2017 ]
While our own newspapers made a lot of intimations that Theresa May's much-anticipated speech on the matter tomorrow will make it clear she is prepared for the UK to leave both the European Single Market and the Brussels-negotiated Customs Union, that German paper had a remarkable on-the-record interview with the Chancellor Philip Hammond......

But in his interview for Welt am Sonntag, Mr Hammond dashed the hopes of those who saw the Treasury as a drag anchor against what might be called the Full Brexit. He insisted the leaders of the EU ‘need to respect the British people’s sense that our history and destiny is an engagement with the rest of the world . . . historically we have never been a nation that was focused on continental Europe’..........

He went on to warn that Germany will pay a high price if that happened: ‘I think Mercedes-Benz and BMW and Volkswagen would also like to sell their cars in the UK market without tariffs. Germany’s biggest bank has a large operation in London and I assume it would like to continue that operation.’
It's coming together. Good news for once.


Jews Pervert the Course Of Democracy & Brexit [ 24 January 2017 ]
Supreme Court rules against Government on Article 50
Theresa May must now get permission of MPs
David Davis to make a statement at 12.30
Corbyn to launch bid to send May's final Brexit deal back to Brussels
Miller, a Jew Used A Third World Alien To Front Attack On Brexit And Democracy


Attack On Brexit And Democracy Set Up By Aliens [ 25 January 2017 ]
Brexit was real Democracy, the voice of the people as distinct from Representative Democracy, a very different kettle of fish. As Gilad Atzmon told us Jews Can Buy All Western Politicians For Less Than One Main Battle Tank. I suspect that our politicians aren't that cheap but, yes they are bent.

The legal attack was fronted by Gina Miller, a Sikh from Guyana & Deir Dos Santos, a barber from Brazil. Lurking behind the scenes is the Jew Alan Miller, husband Mk III of Gina M - see Jew Used Third World Alien To Front Attack On Brexit And Democracy. This may well be why Jews like Mishcon de Reya & David Pannick are being used in court.

The Supreme Court split 8 to 3 on this one; thereby displaying their contempt for democracy and proving law is not involved, just their prejudices. NB The head wallah, Neuberger, is a Jew of authoritarian bent who misapplies the law when he thinks he will. Hale & Kerr are just as bad. Lords Carnwath, Reed & Hughes got it right.

The law is a crap shoot. Albeit the Law And Religion Round Up 18th December casts light on the proceedings.

Our trouble maker is a sour faced rogue full of hate.

See her gloat after defeating England - pro tempore.


Theresa  May’s “Clarification” Of Brexit  Means Brexit  [ 30 January 2017 ]
Does she say everything she means and mean everything she says? Hendo thinks not. She was a Remainer before the Referendum.




Arron Banks ex Wiki
Is a rich supporter of Brexit & UKIP as well as being lively. Left Wingers hate him, a distinct plus point. He reads as a Capitalist Swine with off shore companies.


Gina Miller ex Wiki Sikh, loud, very pushy, a bolter too, currently married to a Jew [ Mk III ]
Gina Nadira Miller[4][5] (born 19 April 1965[6]) is a British[7] business owner who is known for initiating the 2016 R (Miller and Dos Santos) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [ See Dos Santos, a barber ] court case against the British Government over its authority to implement Brexit without approval from the House of Commons. Miller also co-founded SCM Private in 2009[8] and founded the True and Fair Campaign.[9]

Born in British Guiana (now Guyana) as Gina Nadira Singh,[1] the daughter of Doodnauth Singh, former Attorney General of Guyana.[10][11] She moved to England at age 10, [12][13] attending Roedean School until she ran away when age 14. Miller subsequently attended Moira House Girls School.[11][14] She studied law at the Polytechnic of East London (now University of East London) but left without completing her finals because her parents wanted her in Guyana.[11] She gained a degree in marketing, and an MSc in human resource management at the University of London.[6]

She owned a property photographic laboratory in 1987 [ aged 22 ], before becoming a marketing and event manager at BMW Fleet Division in 1990. She started a specialist financial services marketing agency in 1992, and launched the Senate investment conference programme in 1996. In 2006 she became a marketing consultant.[6] In February 2009,[15] Miller co-founded the investment firm SCM Private (now SCM Direct) with her husband Alan Miller.[12][16] She has been a leading campaigner against hidden charges in pensions and investment and what she describes as "flagrant mis-selling within the asset management market". She set up Miller Philanthropy (now rebranded the True and Fair Foundation) in 2009, and established in 2014, as a female-focused investment brand.[6][11]

She has been married three times, and has three children.
PS Husband Mk II Jon MaguireBeat The Fraud Investigation - hints were at 'God told me, look after Africa and I'll sort out your fund', says investment chief whose £400m empire is in turmoil - God may work in mysterious ways, but telling the maverick financier Jon Maguire, whose £400million empire is imploding, to 'look after Africa' seems more puzzling than usual. [ bit rot set in ]


David Pannick ex Wiki
The Times of Israel chooses to allege that Pannick is a Jew.


Mishcon de Reya ex Wiki
Set up by the Jew, Victor Mishcon


Deir Dos Santos ex Daily Mail
Is a barber &  Singh's co-conspirator. He is a Brazilian but alleged to be "British"

Now just where did a Brazilian barber find the money to hire lawyers to run this attack on democracy?


SCM Private the losses behind the headlines
They have attracted plenty of headlines, their investment performance is respectable, but Alan and Gina Miller’s SCM Private has racked up £2.5 million of cumulative losses, according to its accounts at Companies House.

A trawl of the firm’s accounts found that the Millers, who are the sole owners, have put £2.7 million into the partnership, extracting only £190,024 in remuneration since SCM Private was incorporated on 21 January 2009.......

Gina Miller is the face of the True and Fair campaign, which has garnered many column inches across the media. The campaign is calling for greater transparency around fund charges and urging more action be taken to encourage people to save for their retirement.

The pair have been consistently critical of the charges levied by the fund industry, questioning the value of active management. While some would argue this is laudable, the more cynical point to the fact that Alan Miller is understood to have made millions while previously running actively managed funds, including a hedge fund, at New Star. Money that now funds the business and is thought to make up a significant chunk of its AUM.


Alien Enemy Of Brexit Gets Death Threats [ 29 January 2017 ]
Anti-Brexit campaigner Gina Miller may be forced to leave the UK by vicious deaths threats [ allegedly ].

Police are investigating 22 cases of intimidation of the former model, 51, who successfully challenged the authority of the government to invoke Article 50..........

Mrs Miller was the lead claimant in the legal case after she privately engaged the City law firm Mishcon de Reya to challenge the government's authority.
Miller is a Sikh from Guyana fronting for her old man, a Jew. Does she care for England? Does he? Somehow I doubt it but he is using her as a cut out, hiding behind her skirts; she gets the abuse.


Enemies Of Brexit And Democracy Named [30 January 2017 ]
Below Guido introduces his list of MPs who have indicated that they will vote against Article 50. Our spreadsheet includes a column showing how each MP’s constituency voted in the referendum, quite a few are bravely planning to defy their own voters – those Welsh Labour MPs can expect a major UKIP challenge in 2020. LibDems Norman Lamb, Greg Mulholland and John Pugh are not on the list because they abstained from the last Article 50 vote and oppose Tim Farron’s position. Ken Clarke is the only Tory who has signalled an intention to vote against Article 50.
MPs are there for their constituents, in theory. The reality of Representative Democracy is rather different. Bribery is part of it. So is blackmail. The SNP have another opportunity to make themselves a nuisance so they are taking it.


MPs Pass Brexit Bill 498 To 114 [ 2 February 2017 ]
Boris Johnson said that “history has been made” after MPs voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday night in favour of triggering Brexit negotiations and beginning the process of leaving the EU.

The Foreign Secretary called it a “momentous” night as MPs voted four to one in favour of triggering Article 50. Kenneth Clarke, a former chancellor, was the only Tory MP to oppose it.................

Theresa May, the Prime Minister, will today publish a White Paper formally setting out the Government’s plans for Brexit in response to the concerns of pro-European Tory MPs.
The Commons got it right for the right reasons or wrong. The Bill must go through various stages before being signed into law by Elizabeth II. So the Jew,  Alan Miller's attack on Democracy  has almost certainly failed. Miller used another alien, a Sikh Gina Miller to front for him His power play, from behind the scenes is a typical bit of evil. Jews are destroyers.

The MPs who voted against Democracy include the SNP, at least seven Third World undesirables and a Jew.


Tory MPs Collude With Opposition To Derail Brexit [ 7 February 2017 ]
Theresa May is facing a bitter fight for Brexit this week with up to 27 Tory MPs ready to back moves to water down the historic EU Bill.

Conservative rebels are said to be plotting with Labour, the SNP and Liberal Democrats to pass key amendments to the legislation in the Commons. The scale of the opposition has emerged as the parliamentary battle over Brexit enters a new attritional phase.

MPs have tabled more than 140 pages of amendments to the Bill - which is just 137 words long. There will be a series of clashes in the Commons next week after the Speaker selects which changes will be voted on...............

The rearguard action against Brexit is likely to be even more fierce in the Lords, where the government does not have a majority and members are not answerable to voters..............

'In the end the Lords normally defer to the Commons after asking it to think again, maybe once, maybe twice or more ... the scope for mischief is there,' he wrote in The Sun on Sunday.

'If the Lords and the Commons in league with each other were to obstruct and thus sabotage the Government's timetable, it is obvious what the PM should do.
This nausea is the result of mischief making by the Jew Alan Miller using his old woman to front it - see Jew Used Third World Alien To Front Attack On Brexit And Democracy. She is an insolent foreigner full of hate- see Arrogant Third World Alien Attacking Brexit Says We Are Too Stupid To Have The Vote. Getting rid of the House of Lords would be a pity but most of them are not Lords at all, just clapped out politicians and chancers on the make. Lloyd George sorted them out before. He is the crook who brought us his very own Honours Scandal among other worse problems e.g. the First World War.


Elite Made Brexit Happen Says Mervyn King  [ 10 February 2017 ]
Mr King, lately the Governor of the Bank of England doesn't quite say that our Referendum was a vote against Third World immigration; but it was. Mr King doesn't say that it was government policy to inflict these parasites on us  but he knows the truth.
PS The Mail's headline is verbatim.


Jews Manipulating Brexit [ 3 March 2017 ]
The businesswoman behind the Article 50 court case has threatened another legal challenge unless Theresa May guarantees a 'meaningful vote' on any new deal with the EU. Gina Miller said she could not think of 'anything better to do' with her money than ensuring the PM brings the package back before the Commons. [ What about some knitting & dressmaking? ]

The comments came after campaigners obtained legal advice that Britain's 'actual withdrawal' will have to be authorised by a fresh act of Parliament.
This nausea was started by Jews, with an overweening contempt for Democracy; the little people  are so stupid, don't you know? It is fronted by a sour faced, sour tempered enemy alien. Miller is  a Sikh from the Third World. Her current husband, Alan Miller is of course a Jew.

Lest we forget, another Jew with an agenda tried to rid of Comrade Corbyn. The trouble with our little Jeremy is not so much that he is stupid but his idea that Palestinians have human rights e.g. the right not to be robbed, tortured, murdered, Ethnically Cleansed et cetera by Jews, by Zionist crazies.


Lords Vote Against Brexit [ 2 March 2017 ]
THE LORDS have defied the Government [ and England ] over Brexit by voting to guarantee the rights of EU citizens living in the UK. But how did each peer vote last night? Peers voted by 358 to 256 for the amendment that requires proposals to ensure that EU nationals can to stay, within three months of Article 50. 
The pretence was that it was a vote for human rights as distinct from an attempt to Subvert the will of the people, of Democracy. Notice the names of too many Third World aliens and Jews. The vast majority are clapped out politicians on the make.
PS Recall that this whole problem was set in train by Jews but fronted by the Sikh Gina Miller and a Brazilian barber Deir Dos Santos. Hiding behind the scenes was the Jew Alan Miller. Andrew Joyce has something to say about the perpetrators - see Jews Are Leading the Legal Fight Against Brexit. One is Alex Chesterman; the Wikipedia does not say he is a Jew. The Jewish Business News does.


Brexit Bill Passes As The Lords Decide Not To Defy Democracy Again [ 14 March 2017 ]
Theresa May has finally won the power to trigger Article 50 after peers backed down and passed the Brexit Bill after two crucial votes in the Commons earlier. MPs followed orders to delete an amendment on guaranteeing the rights of EU nationals, backing the Government 335 to 287, majority 48.

The Commons also defeated the second amendment on the timetabling of votes at the end of the negotiation by a majority of 45.
This whole Brexit nausea, an attack on Democracy was started by Jews fronted by Third World aliens, a Sikh from Guyana Gina Miller, a Brazilian barber Deir Dos Santos and, hiding behind the scenes, a Jew Alan Miller. See more about the perpetrators at  Jews Are Leading the Legal Fight Against Brexit.


EU Commission Boss Threatens To Screw England Pour Encourager Les Autres [ 25 March 2017 ]
Outrage as Juncker boasts that no-one else will want to leave the EU after they see how badly the UK is punished for Brexit
Jack in Office is a tyrant. Juncker is a loud mouthed peasant from a nothing place, a cock crowing on his dung heap. He will go back to his little village to be forgotten.


British Fishing Grounds Will Be Ours Again [ 27 March 2017 ]
 Recall that Ted Heath, a fat Marxist, a rogue with an unwholesome interest in choirboys and brown envelopes gave our fishing to the Europeans using a postdated cheque so that his treachery would not be exposed until he was out of office. He got away with being a Paedophile because politicians are above the law.


Third World Alien Will Sabotage Brexit Again [ 29 March 2017 ]
This woman is a sour faced Sikh from Guyana. Her old man Alan Miller, the one hiding behind the scenes is a Jew, a manipulator. Andrew Joyce has something to say about the perpetrators - see Jews Are Leading the Legal Fight Against Brexit. One is Alex Chesterman; the Wikipedia does not admit that he is a Jew. The Jewish Business News does, implicitly at all events - see  Zoopla's founder Alex Chesterman execute with $34.2 million deal.

She could do with a good wig and Polyfilla® for her skin.


Theresa May Triggers Brexit - Horse Trading Begins  [ 30 March 2017 ]
The Frogs will be the biggest pain but all of them are likely to be hostile. Of course if that nice Marine le Pen gets to be president it will be that much easier. Recall that  David Davis was 21 SAS so he did Selection and Resistance to Interrogation; he shouldn't have too much trouble with corrupt civilians.


Sterling Is Up After Theresa May Triggered Brexit [ 1 April 2017 ]
The exchange rate went down when we voted to leave Europe. Now it is on its way back up. This is reality, not Propaganda or Main Stream Media lies; the market has spoken. See the graph; see the truth.


Jews Meddling In Brexit [ 19 April 2017 ]
Arch-Remainer Gina Miller is launching a £10,000 election tour urging people to vote against 'extreme Brexit'. The businesswoman and former model has stepped up her campaign after Theresa May dramatically announced a snap poll.

Ms Miller has already forced the PM to pass Brexit legislation through parliament after taking the government to court. Her latest effort involves trying to raise thousands of pounds through crowd funding, which she will use to support Europhile MPs in the run-up to June 8.

Posting on the gofundme website, Ms Miller said she would tour marginal constituencies to ensure the government did not have a mandate to 'destroy our rights and our relationship with Europe'. 'We need to prevent MPs and the people being forced into an extreme Brexit that is not in Britain's best interests,' she wrote.
Gina Miller is a Third World alien, a Sikh from Guyana so you just might wonder whether she cares about British interests. She is fronting for her old man, Alan Miller, a Jew. They definitely don't care about our well being. Recall that Jews Want Third World Immigration for England and the rest of Western Civilization but not for the Stolen Land, not for Israel.

Miller is a surly trouble making devil full of hate.

See her gloat after her legal attack succeeded.


The Twenty One Biggest Donors To The  Leave Brexit Campaign 2017
Tessa Keswick — £20,000
Chris and Monica Miller — £25,000
Lady Annabel Goldsmith — £25,000
Jan Colam — £25,000
Jeremy Woolridge — £35,000
Sir Rocco Forte — £42,000
Will Adderley — £50,000
Terence Mordaunt — £50,000
Lord Harris — £50,000
Paul Marshall — £100,000
Sir Michael Hintze — £100,000
Tim Martin — £212,000
Lord Farmer — £300,000
Michael Freeman — £348,000
Peter Cruddas — £350,000
Lord Bamford — £673,000
Crispin Odey — £873,288.15
Lord Edmiston — £1,000,000
Jeremy Hosking — £1,691,296
Peter Hargreaves — £3,200,000
Arron Banks — £8,106, 375


David Davis Will Walk Away From Brexit Talks If The Foreigners Are Just Trying To Screw Us [ 21 May 2017 ]
David Davis has warned he is ready to walk away from Brexit talks if Brussels demands a €100 billion divorce bill.

The Brexit Secretary declared that he would view £1billion as a 'lot of money' as he made clear he was braced for a 'turbulent' showdown with the EU..............

States who are net contributors to the bloc's coffers are said to be unwilling to pump in more money to cover the huge hole left by Britain's departure. Meanwhile, members who are net recipients of funds are refusing to accept low handouts..............

There are fears the stand-off may end talks almost before they have begun next month - as EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier has said he will not start discussing future trade arrangements until after the terms of the divorce are agreed.........

The divorce demand is now expected to include money they claim is still owed by Britain from the period 2007 to 2013. There could also be pressure for the UK to hand every EU citizen who has lived in the UK full rights to live and work here and claim benefits. 
Notice that their head negotiator is a Frenchman. He will not have mentioned what they owe us from 1939 to 1945 or, for that matter 1914 to 1918. Quite why we should subsidise ungrateful foreigners is another question. Barnier is stalling so that lots of things will get decided in a rush at the last minute to our disadvantage. David Davis isn't fool enough to swallow that. We can always shut off Calais and go through Rotterdam.


DUP Demands A Price For Helping May & Brexit  [ 12 June 2017 ]
The Tories look set to water down their controversial 'dementia tax' as part of a deal with the DUP. The small Northern Irish unionist party, which is in talks with the Conservatives to keep Theresa May in power, has reportedly made protecting pensioners central to their wish list of demands. 

Many Tory voters switched to the DUP [ That is total rubbish - there were no Tories to vote for - Editor ] because they were angry at Mrs May's plans to make more pensioners have to use the value of their home to pay for their care.............

The party  believes [ because it is true ] that former veterans are being hounded through the courts while others involved in Republican violence are not.........

Under hugely unpopular social care reforms unveiled in the Tory manifesto, tens of thousands of people who receive care at home face costly bills as – for the first time. The value of a person’s home will be included in their assets, with only the last £100,000 protected. 

The policy bombed with voters and was seen as the turning point which saw Mrs May's election campaign derail - ending in her humiliation in the vote on Thursday night.
The DUP has its wish list. They will get some; enough perhaps to restart the
guerrilla war in Ireland. The DUP is right about the dementia tax; an obviously stupid idea. Ditto for Malicious Prosecution being used to screw men of the British Army while IRA murderers have immunity. With the DUP on side Theresa May will have a majority of 6, enough but only just.


DUP Invites Labour To Offer Bigger Bribes  [ 23 June 2017 ]
The DUP has held secret talks with Labour and the Lib Dems to pressurise Theresa May into accepting their spending demands, it is claimed. Ian Paisley's party is said to have met with the opposition parties in a bid to get their backing on an amendment to the Queen's Speech which would rule out the return of a hard border with Ireland.

The party, led by Arlene Foster, wants the plans to be approved, in return for them agreeing to a confidence and supply deal with the minority Tory government.
Comrade Corbyn will use this one to leverage Theresa May. He could force her to call another election, putting him in with a chance of power and an opportunity to destroy England.


DUP Demands £2 Billion Bribe  [ 23 June 2017 ]
That is just for starters. Comrade Corbyn and the Liberal one are in attack mode.


UK Ready To Pay £36 Billion Brexit bill, But Only If EU Talks Trade  [ 6 August 2017 ]
Is Her Majesty's Government working in British interests? NO! What are the French going to pay us for helping them in two world war? Not a lot. What are the Germans going to pay us for starting those wars? Not much either but they bunged Jews With Light Fingers Took Germans For €63.2 Billion on the strength of the Holocaust® Story.


David Davis Rejects EU Demand For £100 Billion Exit Ransom  [ 31 August 2017 ]
EU Brexit negotiators were left “flabbergasted” after their British counterparts launched a legal deconstruction of the so-called “Brexit bill” Wednesday as the Brussels talks headed for an increasingly acrimonious impasse, EU sources have told The Telegraph.

British negotiators spent three hours launching a painstaking, line-by-line rebuttal of the EU’s demands for €100bn divorce settlement to the barely concealed fury of EU negotiators.

"There was total amazement,” the EU source said, “Everyone was completely flabbergasted that this young man from Whitehall was saying that the EU's preparation on the financial settlement was 'inadequate'. It did not go down well.
These foreigners are a grasping lot of rogues. Have the French paid us a penny piece after we dug them out of trouble in two world wars? How much did the Germans pay us by way of reparations after causing those same wars? The answer is not much. Now the European Union are demanding our life's blood for the privilege of not being robbed by them. But they are prepared to kick Poland out for free. See e.g. Brexit latest as Donald Tusk admits 'Poland’s future in the EU UNCERTAIN’. It is fair to say that David Davis served, unlike too many politicians. Being in 21 SAS means that he passed Selection & Continuation as well as Resistance to Interrogation. He is not going to be a push over.


The UK holds the cards in the EU 'divorce bill' row [ 2 September  2017 ]
What are these cards? The journo does not say. The French are just plain greedy.


Barnier Hates England  [ 16 October 2017 ]
Brussels’ chief negotiator would be ‘happy’ for Britain to fall out of the EU on ‘hard Brexit’ terms to punish it for leaving, it was claimed last night. A senior diplomatic source said former French minister Michel Barnier, who is handling the talks with Brexit Secretary David Davis, believes Britain must be seen to ‘pay a big price’ for quitting.

A new war of words erupted as former Tory Cabinet Minister Michael Forsyth accused Brussels of ‘Al Capone’ tactics over its demand for Britain to pay a massive divorce bill.
Barmier hates us; it is why he got to be the Brexit negotiator. We dug the French  out from under in two world wars. We should have left them to naughty little Adolf. He wouldn't have put up their insolence or their ingratitude.


Germans Want Free Trade With England  [ 20 October 2017 ]
Bloomberg has the scoop: Germany’s foreign ministry is working on a “balanced, ambitious and far-reaching” free trade deal with Brexit Britain – apparently they want a deal on security, agriculture, trade, energy, air travel and research. Sounds sensible…
One accepts that Merkel is deeply evil, worse than naughty little Adolf Hitler ever was but a 25% import tax on Mercedes would hurt the Hun. Barnier is a malicious Frog trying to screw us. that is why he is refusing to negotiate on trade.


Sweden Wants Free Trade With Us Too  [ 20 October 2017 ]
After the news that Germany is seeking a “comprehensive trade accord” with Britain post-Brexit, now Sweden is drawing up plans for the next stage of talks. The Swedish government has asked its National Board of Trade to report on what they want from a trade deal by the end of January. Trade minister Ann Linde says:

“In order to be ready for forthcoming negotiations, the government is currently calling on the National Board of Trade to draw up a basis for Swedish trade interests in the EU’s negotiations with the UK about a new trade relationship after Brexit................ The in-depth analysis will consider how a future trade agreement can affect trade in key sectors and whether there are existing technical solutions in other EU agreements or other solutions that may be desirable for each sector.”

EU countries are getting ready to move talks on…
The Swedes have worked out that Barnier is stalling because he is a pain in the rectum who hates England. The answer? Buy Volvo, not one of those peculiar French things.


EU Softens A Bit On Brexit To Keep Theresa May In Power  [ 22 October 2017 ]
TRADE talks between Britain and the European Union have inched closer after EU leaders softened their negotiating position.

Discussions on the future trading relationship with the continent have yet to start because talks on issues such as the 'divorce bill' have reached deadlock.
The enemy is using Barmier to screw us; that is policy but David Davis, lately of the SAS is not a soft touch. So Brussels have decided to pretend to be nice. Using Theresa May to defraud us is going to be easier. Notice that they threaten Poland & Hungary for refusing to allow Ethnic Fouling by Third World parasites. With us it is extortion. David Davis has what it takes to tell the Frog to fornicate elsewhere. We stood alone in 1939 against naughty little Adolf. Now in 2017 it is Juncker, a cock crowing on his dung heap.


Brexit Is A Stupid Idea Says Rich Insolent Jew  [ 25 October 2017 ]
But Bloomberg still opens a big office here, not in Frankfurt, Paris or even Dublin because he wants to get even richer.


David Davis Beating Brexit Attackers  [ 11 November 2017 ]
The frog is an arrogant rogue trying to bully David Davis and rob England. No, he is not going to have Northern Ireland; it would not be much use to him, even if he had it.


Brexit Could Make Us A £65 Billion Windfall Say Economists  [ 13 November 2017 ]
Given the reality that economists are normally wrong, it pays to ignore them. Hopefully this time they are right.


Germany 'Expects Unconditional Surrender' From David Davis In Keynote Berlin Speech   [ 17 November 2017 ]
Germany expects Brexit secretary David Davis to offer his "unconditional surrender," to the EU's terms when he delivers a keynote speech to trade chiefs in Berlin on Thursday evening, the former president of the country's largest trade body has warned [ said/stated/alleged/claimed - delete to taste ]. 

Hans-Olaf Henkel, the former head of the Federation of German Industries (BDI) , said both the German government and businesses wanted to see major concessions from Mr Davis on the so-called Brexit bill and transitional arrangements.

It comes after Michel Barnier, the EU's chief negotiator, demanded Britain offer more clarity on the bill if EU leaders were to agree to open discussions on future relations, including a trade deal, at their December summit.
Adolf Hitler was doing the demanding in 1939. Look where that got him. Meanwhile see the next one - i.e. German government collapse.


No Deal Brexit Is The Way To Go Says World Trade Organisation Boss   [ 27 November 2017 ]
BRITAIN has nothing to fear from a “no deal” Brexit, the world’s leading diplomat declared yesterday.

Roberto Azevedo insisted trading with the EU under World Trade Organisation rules was “perfectly manageable”.

The director general of the WTO made the welcome intervention as EU officials turned the heat up on Theresa May in a bid to get Britain to up its divorce bill. Speaking from the WTO HQ in Geneva Mr Azevedo said: “It is not the end of the world if the UK trades under WTO rules with the EU.

“Around half of the UK’s existing trade is already on WTO terms – with the US, China and several large emerging nations where the EU doesn’t have trade agreements.”
Walking away means refusing to pay this monstrous demand from greed driven crooks. We fought off  Hitler & Napoleon; then there was Mussolini. Add in Spain, Portugal, Russia, Holland to get most of Europe. Of course if we don't pay Danegeld the French will be a pain in the rectum, better that than having them sneer at us while they spend our money.


If EU Gets Greedier It Is Time To Walk Away & Let Them Whistle For Danegeld
Rushed prime ministerial visits to the Continent in search of “agreement” tend not to end well.

“I have it. I have the paper. Mr Juncker and I …”

Pray that Theresa May has enough sense of history not to utter anything remotely resembling Neville Chamberlain’s words, either now or later.

If you are in any doubt about how badly the Government has handled these negotiations, you should note that last week we heard that Jean-Claude Juncker was keen for Mrs May to get some sort of agreement in order to prevent the fall of her Government. He feared that she could be replaced by a Eurosceptic prime minister, prepared to leave the EU without a deal. Hey presto, there’s an agreement. Now, it’s on to the next phase..................

Once it became clear that the EU was going to play hardball, she should have immediately embarked on a no-deal strategy. This crucial error has landed us where we are, with the clock ticking.
Being compared with Neville Chamberlain is the ultimate insult. It is about the Appeasement that led to the Second World War. This time we have the nukes but they still qualify as overkill.


Theresa May Pretends She will Stand Up To Johnny Foreigner  [ 11 December 2017 ]
Believe her if you want.


The Inside Story Of How Theresa May And Britain's Brexit Team Secured The Deal With The EU  [ 17 December 2017 ]
That is The Telegraph headline verbatim. Not for nothing is it called The Quislinggraph. Theresa May "succeeded" by letting the enemy win, by betraying us & England. It is always easy to get a quick deal by letting the opposition get have whatever it wants.


  [ 27 December 2017 ]
It is time to tell the Brussels Bandits to fornicate elsewhere
EU officials are planning to hold the lucrative City of London hostage in the looming Brexit trade negotiations, it has been reported. Brussels is scared the next stage of talks will expose deep divisions among the 27 member states as countries will not want their trade harmed in order to punish Britain.

Eurocrats are said to be desperately plotting to maintain the bloc's unity in the face of these competing national interests. Under one plan they will try to block talks on access to the single market for Britain's financial services until the eleventh hour - with one official warning a 'high price' will have to be paid.........

This would set the stage for a major clash between Brussels and Britain as many backed Brexit to free the UK from EU red tape.
Edward Heath got us into the European Union by Treason At Maastricht while Theresa May is letting us down by her weakness & incompetence. Maggie Thatcher wouldn't have put up the insolence of third rate apparatchiks like Juncker.


Spain Wants A Good Brexit Deal Too   [ 13 January 2018 ]
SPAIN has become the latest to join a growing list of EU countries who want to give Britain a good exit deal. The Madrid government’s support for a minimum tariffs agreement emerged after its talks with another pro-UK country, the Netherlands.

It leaves Germany and France more isolated, as the two member states pushing to hit the UK with the toughest conditions for market access. The countries’ two economy ministers agreed to push for a Brexit deal “that keeps Britain as close to the EU as possible”, Bloomberg reported. The Pound soared on the news............

On top of the Dutch, the leaders of Italy, Poland, Hungary and Ireland have all spoken out publicly to call for the EU not to punish the UK for Brexit.

But Spain is also still demanding a say on Gibraltar’s future and has been given a veto on any Brexit deal over it by Brussels [ in order to create problems - Editor ].
Merkel is an enemy of England, Germany & indeed Western Civilization. The French can be perfectly charming but Barmier is another wrong one. That is why Brussels is using him.


French Attack On Brexit Is All About Money  [ 24 January 2018 ]
France is to offer language lessons to London-based bankers and their families in its latest ploy to lure business from the UK capital to Paris after Brexit.

Paris will beef up bilingual schools for children of “impatriates” when they arrive as well as opening a special English-speaking hotline to help them navigate the confusing French education system .
We dug them out from under in two world wars. Are they grateful? Not a chance. Theresa May sacked David Davis because he was getting a decent deal. Now she is smiling at Macron and letting him rob us blind.


Why Would Anyone Believe the Treasury's Brexit Predictions Ever Again? Says Guido Fawkes  [ 31 January 2018 ]
The new Treasury-led Brexit forecasts have to be read in the context of their record at predicting what would happen in the immediate aftermath of a Leave vote.

The HMT prediction for GDP 3 months after the referendum was that “the UK economy would fall into recession” and contract up to -1%. It grew +0.5% in this period.

The Treasury told us: “The analysis shows that immediately following a vote to leave the EU, the economy would be pushed into a recession, with four quarters of negative growth.” The reality has been positive growth every single quarter since.

HMT forecast that in the two years following a Leave vote GDP would fall between -3% and -6%. GDP grew by 1.9% in 2016 and 1.8% in 2017, with better than expected growth in the final quarter. There is now no recession forecast. 

On unemployment, they infamously said it would rise by between 500,000 and 820,000 in the immediate aftermath of the referendum. Unemployment fell again last week to a four-decade low.

And the Treasury said government borrowing would rise by up to £39 billion immediately after the vote. Instead borrowing for the financial year to date is down 12% on the same period last year. That’s the lowest year-to-date total since 2007.
These people produce numbers and waffle, baffling us with alleged science. They baffle themselves too.


Jew Threatens Another Attack On Brexit And Democracy  [ 29 January 2018 ]
Remain campaigner Gina Miller has threatened a new court challenge to ministers over the deal with the DUP to spend an extra £1billion in Northern Ireland............

Ms Miller - who rose to prominence successfully challenging Theresa May's power to invoke Article 50 and start Brexit - insists there should have a Commons vote.
This will be a second legal attack on Democracy fronted by a Sikh from Guyana Gina Miller and, behind her skirts, a Jew Alan Miller. Andrew Joyce has something to say about the perpetrators - see Jews Are Leading the Legal Fight Against Brexit. . One is Alex Chesterman; the Wikipedia does not admit that he is a Jew. The Jewish Business News does, implicitly at all events - see  Zoopla's founder Alex Chesterman execute with $34.2 million deal. Miller looks like a surly troublemaker.


Jews Attacking Brexit And Theresa May [ 9 February 2018 ]
George Soros, the billionaire known as the man who “broke the Bank of England”, is backing a campaign to overturn Brexit, the Telegraph can disclose. The investor is one of three senior figures linked to the Remain-supporting campaign group Best for Britain who plan to launch a nationwide advertising campaign this month, which they hope will lead to a second referendum to keep Britain in the EU.

The campaign is trying to recruit major Tory donors in an attempt to undermine Theresa May. It also plans to target MPs and convince them to vote against the final Brexit deal to trigger another referendum or general election, according to a strategy document leaked from a meeting of the group...............

Mr Soros’s involvement emerged after he entertained six Conservative donors at his Chelsea house last Monday........... More recently he has been accused of organising rallies against Donald Trump in the US and interfering in the democracies of several European nations.

Also at the dinner were Stephen Peel and Sir Martin Sorrell, the chief executive of the advertising firm WPP.
Soros is a Jew full of hate, active in flooding Europe with Third World parasites. See e.g. This is Europe’s Last Chance to Fix Its Refugee Policy [ to his satisfaction ] or Why I’m Investing $500 Million [ To Import ] Migrants. Gina Miller is a Sikh from Guyana married to a Jew; it helps him hide. See e.g. Jew Used Third World Alien To Front Attack On Brexit And Democracy. Sorrell is fingered as another one by the Wiki. See Martin Sorrell ex Wiki.


Brussels Bullies Threaten England With Trade Embargo [ 7 February 2018 ]
Brussels plans to punish Britain if it refuses to sign up to new EU laws during the two-year Brexit transition period by stripping the UK of single market access. Leaked EU documents show that the EU is plotting to draw up a punishment clause which could see planes grounded if the UK does not abide by all its regulations...........

Under the plans, Brussels will demand that Britain signs up to all new rules and regulations during the two -year transition.

It also wants to strip the UK of the right to challenge decisions made by EU judges in the European Court of Justice during the transition. If the UK refuses then the Brussels club plans to hit back by blocking sectors from having access to the single market.
The Frogs are being a pain in the rectum. That is why they are using Barmier. Do we really need Mercedes? We could even try making our own cars again. It didn't work last time but the Japs can do it properly.


Brussels plots to strip Britain of single market access if it ignores EU law during Brexit transition  [ 7 February 2018 ]
The Telegraph confirms the Mail's story. Theresa May took over negotiation; she is fouling up big time.


6 Major Leave Donors Receive Identical Death Threats  [ 11 February 2018 ]
At least six prominent donors to the Leave campaign have received identical death threats in the past week as part of a concerted campaign of intimidation from a group calling itself “The Real 48 Per Cent”, Guido can reveal. The chilling letters, which were typed but sent in handwritten envelopes, told the recipients: “You have stoked the fires of Brexit and led us to this moment. You can no longer be tolerated. We are coming for you. We are going to kill you”. Guido is aware of six Leave donors who have received the same letter...........The sender identified themselves as an opponent of Brexit, writing: “We were born in Britain. We live in the UK. We are European”. If you are a Leave donor who also received the letter and haven’t spoken to Guido yet, get in touch. The police would also like to hear from you…
There are Jews Attacking Brexit And Theresa May. They would doubtless claim with great enthusiasm that they did not do this bit of intimidation. Political manipulation using Terrorism for Zionist crazies. The King David Hotel Bombing is just one of hundreds of operations they carried out. Of course Mossad is a criminal organization run by vicious Jews out of control.


Anti-Brexit Pressure Group Trains Supporters To Pressurize MPs  [ 28 May 2018 ]
Pro-EU supporters are being trained to 'ruthlessly' target MPs in a series of nationwide roadshows aimed at stopping Brexit, the Daily Mail has claimed. The Best for Britain campaign, which is backed by billionaire George Soros, is allegedly using the events to highlight ways activists can 'press the right buttons' to frighten politicians into voting against leaving Europe.

The strategy reportedly includes getting negative stories about MPs in the local and national papers because these will 'get to them on a personal level'. It also encourages mass phone-ins and letter-writing campaigns to get MPs with slim majorities into believing they will lose their seat if they support Brexit, the paper claims. Activists are told: 'Like anyone, an MP is worried about keeping their job. 'This is a very personal motivator, and raising uncertainty in their mind about this can have an enormous impact on their actions.'
Brexit was Democracy in action. Politicians hate it. So do the Puppet Masters, the manipulators behind the scenes. Jews like Soros want a New World Order with them in charge. Democracy be damned. "Best for Britain", a pressure group started by the Jew, Alan Miller using a Third World foreigner, Gina Miller, a Sikh from Guyana to front it. Other Jews are at the heart of it. Here the Mail explains how Propaganda machine operate; they are in the business so they really do know.

This is part of the take over of Western Civilization, part of the Long March Through The Institutions using Entryism. The techniques were worked out by Antonio Gramsci, the leading intellectual of the Italian communist party.


Weep For Brexit The British Dash For Independence Has Failed   [ 7 June 2018 ]
That is the Telegraph's headline verbatim. Did Theresa May cock it up deliberately? Did she sideline David Davis in order to make it fail? Quite possibly. Is she an Enemy Of The People importing Third World parasites with malice aforethought? Yes! Is it part of the Ethnic Fouling of England, being used to cause Genocide? Yes! Is that why she appointed a Pakistani as Home Secretary and a black as a minister? Presumably. See the next one.

Korbyn the Klown. Does he care about England or for it; is he another destroyer? Recall what Vladimir Lenin had to say about Comrade  Corbyn's comrades - see Labour Party Assessed By Comrade Lenin. His remarks are in full at Marxism and the British Labour Party:-
"Regarded from this, the only correct, point of view, the Labour Party is a thoroughly bourgeois party, because, although made up of workers, it is led by reactionaries, and the worst kind of reactionaries at that, who act quite in the spirit of the  bourgeosie. It is an organisation of the bourgeoisie, which exists to systematically dupe the workers with the aid of the British Noskes and  Scheidemanns."[ See ]


ENDLESS BREXIT SHAMBLES Now Barnier REJECTS Britain's proposal to include time limit UK  [ 8 June 2018 ]
Theresa May agrees to ‘meaningless’ 2021 cut-off date in Brexit bodge to prevent cabinet walkout
Theresa May's humiliating climb down to keep David Davis onboard could delay Brexit until 2021
Three papers, three headlines. One prime minister, a long string of cock ups. She has turned dealing with the enemy into a mess.; grasping defeat from the jaws of victory. The Frogs robbed us blind going in because Heath wanted to join at any price. Now they are doing it again after we dug them out of trouble in two world wars. Maggie must be turning in her grave.


David Davis Resigns Due To Brexit Nausea  [ 9 July 2018 ]
David Davis resigns from Cabinet over Theresa May's Brexit plan
Steve Baker, his deputy, and another Brexit minister also quit

Jacob Rees-Mogg says he cannot vote for Brexit plan

Prime Minister is due to address Tory MPs on Monday night

Theresa May: Our Brexit offer fulfills the vote to Leave

Theresa May's Government is in deep crisis after David Davis dramatically resigned as Brexit secretary on Sunday night.

Mr Davis shocked the Prime Minister by telling her he could not support the Brexit plan agreed at Chequers on Friday, and was quitting “in the national interest”.
Theresa May is grossly incompetent. That is the kindest possible view. Of course she is also a Traitor, an Enemy Of The People importing Third World parasites by the thousand but then they all are. David Davis acted in the national interest. How many politicians know about that, far less care? Mr Davis served Queen and Country while he was with  21 SAS. How may politicians ever did that?


Theresa May Has Destroyed Brexit  [ 7 July 2018 ]
Theresa May has announced that her Cabinet has signed up to a Brexit deal that would keep Britain tied to EU rules and regulations indefinitely.

The Prime Minister said Britain would establish a “free trade area for goods” with the EU, allowing for frictionless trade and avoiding the need for a hard border in Northern Ireland. A new customs arrangement will treat the UK and EU “as if [they are] a combined customs territory” and Britain will adopt a “common rulebook” with the EU on industrial goods and agricultural products.
Is the woman a fool, incompetent or lacking drive? Maggie would not have swallowed a total defeat by corrupt politicians in Brussels. On this day in 2014 Theresa May set up the 2014 United Kingdom Child Sexual Abuse Panel Inquiry, which did nothing for the 1,400 known victims of Pakistani Perverts in Rotherham but is making lotsa lawyers even richer while keeping lotsa police and politicians out of prison.


This Is Brexit In Name Only To Keep The Plebs Happy  [ 14 July 2018 ]
My wife has decided she likes Dominic Raab, the latest poor sap to be despatched from a hamstrung, spasticated government to negotiate our exit from the European Union before a plethora of sniggering pygmies from the Low Countries. I think it’s the sound of his surname, those consecutive vowels, because I’ve noticed she also likes aardvarks and once expressed a wish to visit Aachen. I can’t think of many other reasons to like the chap. He surely knows what we all know, Leavers and Remainers alike — that the route our Prime Minister dreamed up one night while out of her box on skag, presumably, is not Brexit at all and would leave us in a far worse position than if we remained within the confines of that increasingly totalitarian bureaucracy.

It is in fact that thing which has become a hallmark of the staggeringly hapless May’s administration, the botched quick-fix designed solely to keep her in office for a few more weeks. Everybody knows this — in Europe and inside our government and out. It would have been better if she had said simply: ‘We’re not leaving the EU. That referendum counts for nothing, so stuff it. We, the establishment, know better, and we’re staying in.’ That would be far more honest, and preferable for the country too. These cosmetic genuflections to the will of the people become more emetic with every day that passes. Brexit in name only, to keep the plebs — the thick northerners, the racists, the England supporters, the, er, democrats — happy, because they know no better.

May was a Remainer, of course, so we understand that she does not have an ideological investment in Britain leaving the EU. It is why she should never have become Prime Minister. But she ascended to that hugely unlikely role because of political failures more grave than her own: the Tory Brexit-eers and, in particular, Boris Johnson.

I like Boris, personally. He is indeed capable of being witty and is good company. He has chutzpah. I don’t mind the buffoonish stuff, either — hell, not every senior politician needs to be as deathly boring as Douglas Hurd or Norman Fowler. And he gave me a column in this magazine, so I should be much more grateful.

But there is a strand of intense dimness running through that family which, when allied to an almost bizarre sense of entitlement occasioned by the most expensive upbringing that money can buy, plus a surfeit of ambition and an almost complete absence of principle, leads us to where we are now. The least effective foreign secretary in 60 years resigns and is hunkered down with his simpering groupies preparing for what he thinks is his birthright, i.e. to lead the country.

You must be joking, Boris. Is anyone convinced that Boris is a committed Brexiteer? Sure — I know from first hand his genuine disdain for the rules and regulations of the EU. But I suspect he opted for ‘out’ in 2016 because he thought there was more chance of personal advancement in taking that position. Which is also why I think he has now resigned. (‘Does another resignation weaken her fatally? Or will it weaken me if I do it?’ That was the calculation.) I don’t think leaving the European Union came into it.

And remember the debacle once we had voted to Leave — the complete absence of any senior figure from the Leave camp capable of stepping forward, a catastrophe of vaulting ambition, spite, misplaced hubris and real stupidity which left the Conservative party with a choice between Theresa May and some woman called Andrea.

I cannot remember a time when the British public — both the decisive majority who voted Leave, and the Remainers — have been more let down. Stupidity particularly — a familiar trope for the Tories, I suppose: the stupid party. Exacerbated by May’s decision to foist an unwanted election upon the country, with the result that her previously tricky position has now become patently impossible and untenable.

I see May’s current difficulty. I do get that. No working majority. A party and parliament (and establishment) which is for Remain, an electorate which expresses a clear majority for Leave. How to square the two? And the answer — pay lip service to Leave and the public will, while remaining. But that doesn’t work. And it plays into the hands of those with whom we are negotiating.

It should never have been quite this problematic. The European Union is itself in utter disarray. One by one the countries of central Europe are rebelling against the diktat from Brussels — primarily over immigration, but also over their rights to run their own countries as they see fit without being chastised by a perpetually zonked Luxembourgish panjandrum and threatened with sanctions.

And one by one, Eurosceptic parties or coalitions are winning elections. This is something we should have exploited from day one. We should make common cause with the Hungarians and the Greeks and Czechs and the Poles and the Austrians and the Italians. Oh, and of course the Catalans. Support them in their struggles against the very machine which we voted to be rid of. Tell Barnier we will pay not a single penny to the EU and that he can do his worst. Strike an immediate trade deal with the USA, Australia and China. If the EU threatens tariffs against our exports, do the same back: they lose more than we do. If this leads to a ‘hard border’ in Northern Ireland, so be it. We should leave the border soft, because that is what our people want. If the EU wishes to police it and set up customs posts from Donegal to Newry, let them, and then let the people of that island see who, exactly, is causing the problems. Call their bluff. It would be bumpy for a while. But scarcely less bumpy than it is now.
The argument continues online.


Britain Will Not Pay Danegeld To Brussels Without A Result    [ 22 July 2018 ]
Britain will refuse to pay its £39 billion divorce bill to Brussels if the European Union fails to agree a trade deal, the new Brexit Secretary pledges today. Dominic Raab told The Sunday Telegraph that he would make the vast payment formally conditional on the EU “fulfilling its side of the bargain”.

The promise will be welcomed by leading Brexiteers after the Government said in May that there were no plans for a legally enforceable link between the bill and a future trading relationship.

Amid a breakdown of trust with No 10, pro-Brexit MPs had threatened to force an amendment into the Government’s Implementation Bill in the autumn after Philip Hammond claimed that “walking away from an obligation ... would not make us a credible partner in future international agreements”.

In his first newspaper interview since his appointment, Mr Raab said that Article 50, the exit mechanism triggered by the UK, called for a trade deal as well as the withdrawal agreement, which includes the £39 billion divorce bill. 
Dominic Raab talks about taking the war to the enemy, albeit he puts it rather differently. Having someone effective running things is good news. This is not a criticism of David Davis, far from it. Theresa May is ruining the whole thing by her treachery or incompetence & helped by the malice of the light fingered rogues in Brussels.


Dominic Raab Gets A Grip On Brexit - May Sacks Him  [ 25 July 2018 ]  
Dominic Raab was interrupted by news of his own demotion today as he denied being sidelined by the Prime Minister seizing personal control of the Brexit talks.

As the new Brexit Secretary gave evidence to MPs about his role, his phone rang with a Sky News alert. The only notification at the same time was about Theresa May's announcement appointing herself as the lead Brexit negotiator.

During his evidence, Mr Raab insisted there were 'no tensions' as he gave evidence to MPs alongside Mrs May's top aide Olly Robbins - who has just been handed more powers.................

Mrs May said: 'I will lead the negotiations with the European Union, with the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union deputising on my behalf.' 
Cause and effect? Does it just look like it? Is May a fool, a Traitor or both? She went behind David Davis's back to undermine him. Now she is at it  with Mr Raab.  She is obviously one of the Enemy Within, importing vicious Third World parasites by the thousand. That is Genocide, a crime against International Law; see the UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide for more and better details. May is just like every other prime minister back to  Blair if not Heath.
PS The Mail's readers are not impressed by May. Someone else took direct personal command, a little chap called Adolf. It didn't work out awfully well for him, his Thousand Year Reich or Germans.


Barnier Treats Theresa May With Contempt   [ 28 July 2018 ]          
............At yesterday’s negotiations press conference with Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab, the EU’s chief negotiator, Michel Barnier, dismissed any possibility of peeling off national leaders – “Anyone who wants to find a sliver of difference between my mandate and the leaders is wasting their time”.

The main takeaway from Thursday’s presser was Barnier’s response to May’s complex customs proposals: “The EU cannot and the EU will not delegate the application of its customs policy, of its rules, VAT and excise duty collections to a non-member who would not be subject to the EU’s governance structures”.

In short, “non”.
Barnier's real message is Fuck Off.


Civil Service Mandarins Working To Destroy Brexit Get £750,000 Bung For Their Pains  [ 20 August 2018 ]  
Brexit civil servants received more than £750,000 in bonuses last year, despite fears that the UK could crash out of the EU with no deal. Dominic Raab, the Brexit Secretary, faced calls to justify the huge performance pay-out.

The row broke amid reports that the Government’s own ‘no-deal Brexit’ plans will this week warn that the M20 would become a giant lorry park if the UK left with no formal accord. Mr Raab sought to dispel gloom over the Brexit talks last night, claiming that ‘securing a deal is still by far the most likely outcome’.
The concept of bribing civil servants is corruption of the blatant, shameless, in your face sort. MPs do the same by taking bungs and declaring them. The BNP is not amused either. Mr Raab did get off to a good start, taking the war to the enemy, which is why May leaned on him.


Theresa May's Brexit Stitch Up Falling Apart  [ 15 November 2018 ]
Theresa May is facing the threat of all-out Tory revolt today after Dominic Raab dramatically quit saying he could not 'in good conscience' submit to a Brexit deal that amounts to 'blackmail'.

The Brexit Secretary dropped the bombshell news the morning after the PM forced the terms of her proposed plan through Cabinet in a stormy five-hour meeting.

Mr Raab was understood to have endorsed the draft deal 'with a heavy heart' at the meeting yesterday, but harboured deep concerns about the UK being locked into the Irish border 'backstop'.
It was amazing that the Cabinet swallowed her plan, 500 pages of it, her surrender to the enemy. Now her second Brexit minister has refused to countenance it. Will she get it though Parliament? Will the Irish swallow it? No chance. Will Comrade Corbyn use it? He certainly will; he wants another general election, power and a chance to destroy England.  In fact he is protecting May because millions know what his game is. Voting for him would be accelerated suicide.
PS The minister for Northern Ireland, Salish Vera bailed out too. He has some understanding of the constituents even though he is a Third World alien. NB May has managed to drop the price of the pound from EUR 1.1471228
to EUR 1.1325, some 1.4% in a few hours.


Jacob Rees-Mogg Submits Letter Of No Confidence In PM As Brexit Deal Sparks Wave Of Resignations  [ 15 November 2018 ]
That is a third resignation. May is on a loser.


Politicians Squabble Over May's Brexit Foul Up As Third World Parasites Flood England And Parliament [ 17 November 2018 ]
British Prime Minister Theresa May has predictably completely messed up the “Brexit” process, sparking off a fierce squabble in her own party which may yet bring her government down, while the real threat to the country’s future—Third World immigration—continues unchecked and ignored, and made up nearly 60 percent of all inward migration in 2017.

At time of writing, a number of May’s senior government figures had resigned, and more were threatening to do so. At the same time, the real possibility of a motion of “no confidence” in her awaits in the British Parliament.

However, an analysis of the “British” politicians who have resigned from May’s government reveals what is really happening to Britain: a great racial replacement which is far more important than low-level squabbles over customs agreements and the like.

Of the seven resignations so far, four have been nonwhites whose immediate origins are outside the UK. They are as follows:
Rehman Chishti [ Pakistani ]
Shailesh Vara [ Indian from Uganda ]
Suella Braverman [ Indian from Goa - looks stupid ]
Ranil Jayawardena [ from Ceylon ]
PS The New Observer does not mention that the mayor of London is a Pakistani. Recall what a previous crooked prime minister said: Cameron Wants England Run By A Pakistani. He looks fair set to get away with it.


Brexit Means Brexit - Allegedly   [ 20 November 2018 ]
Two-and-a-half years on, Brexit means anything but Brexit. The Spectator has a grim hit parade of the Top Forty horrors to emerge from the PM's "deal" with Brussels. Sample quote from her triumphant "agreement" with the Eurocrats:

All references to Member States and competent authorities of Member States ...shall be read as including the United Kingdom.

You can check out any time you like
But you can never leave;
It's just like Hotel California
PS Theresa May has got the pound down to EUR 1.12 & Comrade Corbyn slavering in the red corner. His bid for power is looking like a better bet.


The top 40 horrors lurking in the small print of Theresa May’s Brexit deal   [ 20 November 2018 ]
[ Read this rubbish if you want. I won't - Editor ]

What's in the 585 pages of small print that no normal human being will read? The answer is total surrender and paying billions of our money to the light fingered thieves in Brussels. Small print is there to conceal the truth


The Brexit deal 40 rebuttals to Mr Steerpike’s 40 horrors   [ 20 November 2018 ]

Downing Street responds. Believe them? Not me, not ever.


No Deal Is The Best Deal   [ 23 November 2018 ]
How to save Brexit
It’s pretty hard for Britain’s friends, here in Australia, to make sense of the mess that’s being made of Brexit. The referendum result was perhaps the biggest-ever vote of confidence in the United Kingdom, its past and its future. But the British establishment doesn’t seem to share that confidence and instead looks desperate to cut a deal, even if that means staying under the rule of Brussels. Looking at this from abroad, it’s baffling: the country that did the most to bring democracy into the modern world might yet throw away the chance to take charge of its own destiny.

Let’s get one thing straight: a negotiation that you’re not prepared to walk away from is not a negotiation — it’s surrender. It’s all give and no get. When David Cameron tried to renegotiate Britain’s EU membership, he was sent packing because Brussels judged (rightly) that he’d never actually back leaving. And since then, Brussels has made no real concessions to Theresa May because it judges (rightly, it seems) that she’s desperate for whatever deal she can get.

The EU’s palpable desire to punish Britain for leaving vindicates the Brexit project. Its position, now, is that there’s only one ‘deal’ on offer, whereby the UK retains all of the burdens of EU membership but with no say in setting the rules. The EU seems to think that Britain will go along with this because it’s terrified of no deal. Or, to put it another way, terrified of the prospect of its own independence.................

As a former prime minister of Australia and a lifelong friend of your country, I would say this: Britain has nothing to lose except the shackles that the EU imposes on it. After the courage shown by its citizens in the referendum, it would be a tragedy if political leaders go wobbly now. Britain’s future has always been global, rather than just with Europe. Like so many of Britain’s admirers, I want to see this great country seize this chance and make the most of it.
Tony Abbott is a sensible chap. The 500 page surrender document [ see The top 40 horrors lurking in the small print of Theresa May’s Brexit deal ] that the Brussels crooks have produced proves that. May is the Enemy Of The People.


Donald Trump Calls Theresa May's Brexit Deal 'Great For The EU' And Warns It May Rule Out Any Trade Deal With US  [ 27 November 2018 ]
Don gets it right for once & he is a deal maker.


Europe Needs Us More Than We Need Them  [ 13 December 2018 ]
The balance of economic terror over Brexit has shifted over the last year.  The eurozone is more vulnerable to the shock of no-deal rupture on punitive Macronesque terms than it was at the point of peak hubris in December 2017, when EU negotiators set the trap of the Irish backstop.  

Europe’s QE boomlet has since deflated. The underlying pathologies of monetary union are again in evidence. The bloc is stuck with a North-South chasm in competitiveness that has left a string of countries in near permanent malaise, starved of public investment and left with no way out other than internal devaluations. This has led to the Gilets Jaunes in France, and Lega-Five Star revolt in Italy.
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, a first rate journo wrote this. May is incompetent, corrupt or both. I settle for the latter.


Europe Is Disintegrating - Leaving Is Great  [ 27 December 2018 ]
The Brexit debate has plunged British politics into an agony of self-doubt.

After a year of political high drama and turbulence, and given the seeming parliamentary impasse over the Prime Minister’s deal, there are massive anxieties about the consequences of leaving the EU without a withdrawal agreement in place...................

But we should also count our blessings. We are not the only country experiencing turmoil — and for many of our neighbours it is far worse.
Merkel is using Illegal Immigration to destroy Germany. Macron is doing the same to France without any help. Spain's unemployment is monstrous. Then there are the east European countries with allegedly Far Right governments voted in by real people that refuse to let in Illegal Immigrants. Sensible chaps, what? Worry about Brexit? Not me. No Deal is the Real Deal. 
PS You might remember those people telling us that we needed to join the Euro or starve or suffer from a plague of boils or.......... They are the same lot, Lenin's Useful Idiots; wrong then, wrong now, wrong forever.


Bercow Trying To Stop Brexit         [ 11 January 2019 ]
But then Bercow is a Jew. Recall that the legal attack on Brexit was fronted by a Third World alien, a Sikh from Guyana Gina Miller, a Brazilian barber Deir Dos Santos and, hiding behind the scenes, a Jew Alan Miller. Jews want the New World Order, with them in charge. See more on the point from Andrew Joyce in his article,  Jews Are Leading the Legal Fight Against Brexit. One more is Alex Chesterman.


MI6 Boss Says May's Withdrawal Agreement Threatens National Security  [ 11 January 2019 ]
The former head of MI6 has called on MPs to block the Prime Minister’s Brexit withdrawal agreement, warning it “threatens national security”.

Sir Richard Dearlove joined forces with Lord Guthrie, the former chief of defence staff, to take the unprecedented step of writing to Conservative Association chairmen. They described Theresa May’s deal as a “bad agreement” and accused the EU of demanding a £39billion “ransom”.

The letter states: “Your MP will shortly be called upon to support the Prime Minister's withdrawal agreement. As a former chief of the secret intelligence service, with my colleague Lord Guthrie, who served as chief of the defence staff shortly before I was in charge of MI6, we are taking the unprecedented step of writing to all Conservative Party Chairmen to advise and to warn you that this withdrawal agreement, if not defeated, will threaten the national security of the country in fundamental ways. Please ensure that your MP does not vote for this bad agreement.”................

They add: “Buried in the agreement is the offer of a 'new, deep and special relationship' with the EU in defence, security and intelligence which cuts across the three fundamentals of our national security policy: membership of NATO, our close bilateral defence and intelligence relationship with the USA,

“The first duty of the state, above trade, is the security of its citizens. The Withdrawal Agreement abrogates this fundamental contract and would place control of aspects of our national security in foreign hands. Please ensure that your that your MP does not vote for this bad agreement.”...........

“The first duty of the state, above trade, is the security of its citizens. The Withdrawal Agreement abrogates this fundamental contract and would place control of aspects of our national security in foreign hands. Please ensure that your MP votes against this bad agreement and supports a sovereign Brexit on WTO rules, without payment of ransom.”..............
Notice that Sir Richard and Lord Guthrie wrote to Conservative Party chairmen not the MPs, who are too involved in Westminster to be trusted with the national interest. They know that Salus Populi Suprema Lex; it means that the welfare of the people shall be the supreme law. Theresa May doesn't know or doesn't care.


Another Politician Lies About Brexit     [ 13 January 2019 ]
Are they all stupid? Do they all have agendas? They do hate Democracy and the will of the people. This oik is Grayling, another nothing man. May is the worst because she has the power. She is determined to betray us and Brexit both.


Nigel Farage Sorts Out Brexit Nausea  [ 16 January 2019 ]
NIGEL Farage claimed the European Union would "bite our arms off" if Theresa May was swiftly replaced by a Brexiteer announcing the UK exit from the EU under WTO rules on March 29th.

Speaking to ITV Good Morning Britain, the prominent Brexiteer argued the EU would come back with a better deal within 48 hours if the threat of leaving under WTO rules was delivered to them by a new pro-Leave Prime Minister. Nigel Farage added a new leader could parachute in as soon as possible and still manage to deliver Brexit by March 29th. But the former Ukip leader admitted House of Commons Speaker John Bercow would never allow a no deal scenario to materialise and the most likely outcome will be an extension of Article 50 and a second referendum.
Nigel Farage is a competent politician - unlike Theresa May. This may well be why he did not say that Bercow is an enemy of England and a Jew.

Tory MPs Voted Against May And For England  [

The majority of 230 was by far the biggest on record, higher than the 166 defeat for the Labour majority government in 1924


Government Entitled to Ask Queen Not to Give Assent to Brexit Wreckers' Bills  [ 22 January 2019 ]
Devastating argument from Policy Exchange this morning. Sir Stephen Laws QC – who was until 2012 the Government’s most senior lawyer on legislative and constitutional matters – says don’t assume that MPs could engineer a change to the law to postpone or cancel Brexit without persuading Government to acquiesce and participate in securing the change.

Attempting to change the law without the Government’s participation, he argues, could jeopardise fundamental constitutional principles based on centuries of history, especially if the Speaker dispenses with or ignores a rule that gives Government complete control over increases to public expenditure................

If the Speaker and Dominic Grieve are going to vandalise the constitution and overturn established parliamentary conventions, don’t expect the government to just roll over. The Attorney General Geoffrey Cox will be studying this argument closely as no doubt will the Brexit sympathetic Queen. Bercow is only the Prince of Parliament, though he might not want to believe, the Queen still outranks him constitutionally. Grieve isn’t as clever as he thinks he is…
Sir Stephen Laws KCB QC ran the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel. Here he explains The Risks Of The Grieve Amendment. Sir Stephen outranks Grieve, a mere Attorney General, an arrogant rogue who hates Democracy, the will of the people. Ditto for Bercow, a crooked chancer, Enemy Of The People and Jew.


MPs Plotting To Stop Brexit             [ 23 January 2019 ]
Theresa May tried to do it by lying to us. She is not the only Traitor in Parliament, far from it. Recall their enthusiasm for Expense Fraud. Some things do not change. Bribing them does not cheap but it pays off big time.


Conservative Donors Refuse To Hand Over Cash In 'Disgust' Over Theresa May's Leadership And Brexit Policy  [ 26 January 2019 ]
Major Conservative donors are refusing to give money to the party because of “disgust” at Theresa May’s leadership and her handling of Brexit, The Daily Telegraph can reveal.  The businessmen – who together have given millions of pounds to the party since Mrs May became Prime Minister – do not want to fund a potential snap general election with Mrs May still in post.

Several said they were planning to stay away from next month's glittering Black and White Ball, one of the party’s biggest annual fundraising events, when access to ministers is auctioned to raise hundreds of thousands of pounds.
The "Telegraph" speaks, telling the truth more or less. Not for nothing is it called The Quislinggraph. Some newspapers tell some of the truth some of the time. The ugly reality is put more bluntly in an article, Brexit Theresa May Goes Greek!, by Brett Redmayne-Titley ex The Unz Review. Politicians conspire to screw Democracy. He is very much on the right lines.  May is like Blair, Brown, Cameron et al ad nauseam, an Enemy Of The People.
PS Recall that Her Majesty's Government Is In Contempt of Parliament but they just ignored the matter and carried on abusing power.


Brexit Blocking Politicians Paid Millions By The EU  [ 5 February 2019 ]
Dozens of peers and MPs received millions in EU subsidies for their estates, according to a new survey by Friends of the Earth, which estimates that almost 50 politicians have cashed in.  Why wouldn't they if the handouts are on offer? But look closer at those names and surprise, surprise, some are leading the campaign to block Brexit.

They include the Duke of Wellington who last year received £91,000 for his 7,000-acre Hampshire estate.  The 73-year-old unelected peer spearheaded a House of Lords move to delete the exit date, March 29, 2019, from the EU (Withdrawal) Bill.  Lord Haskins, 81, who has voted for a second referendum, received £82,000 last year for his farmland in Yorkshire. 
Trust the Friends of the Earth? Not me but their accusations are likely to be factual. Money brings out the worst in lotsa people.

Snouts in the trough, as usual.


Brexit Party ex Wiki    [ 9 February 2019 ]
The Brexit Party is a Eurosceptic, pro-Brexit political party based in the United Kingdom and supported by former UKIP leader, Nigel Farage MEP, who announced he would stand as a candidate for the party in any future European Parliament elections, in the event the UK had not left the European Union.[4][5]

The party was launched on 20 January 2019 by former UKIP economic spokesperson Catherine Blaiklock.[6] It was recognised by the United Kingdom Electoral Commission on 5 February 2019 as duly registered to run candidates in any English, Scottish, Welsh and European Union elections.[2][4]

On the day of the launch, Nigel Farage, who has been an independent MEP since his departure from UKIP, stated that the party was Blaiklock's idea, but that she had acted with his support.[6] In a 24 January 2019 interview, Blaiklock said: "I won't run it without Nigel [Farage], I'm a nobody and I haven't got any ego to say that I am an anybody", and that: "I'm happy to facilitate Nigel and do the donkey work and work for him, but I don't have any allusions [sic] as to myself".[7] On 8 February 2019, Farage stated he would stand as a candidate for the party in any potential future European Parliament elections contested in the United Kingdom.[8][9] MEP Steven Woolfe, also formerly of UKIP, stated that he would also stand for the party.[10]

On 1 February 2019, Blaiklock told The Telegraph that the party raised £1 million in donations, and that more than 200 "highly professional people" have come forward offering to stand for The Brexit Party at the May 2019 European Parliament elections, if the United Kingdom has not left the European Union by then.[11]

In an editorial on the 4 February 2019, The Independent identified The Brexit Party as being one of a number of new "ideologically pure" parties to which "radical neo-Thatcherite hard-Brexit" members of the Conservative party were being attracted.[12]


Real Brexit Worries German Business   [ 7 February 2019 ]
So says The Telegraph. It might even be true. Not for nothing is it called The Quislinggraph. We buy a lot more from Brer Hun that vice versa so it does make sense.


Brexit Party Is Up And Running Now  [ 10 February 2019 ]
A new Brexit  party backed by Nigel Farage was officially recognised yesterday by the electoral regulator.  The Electoral Commission said the ‘Brexit Party’ is an official organisation which will allow it to field candidates at elections.

Former UKIP leader Mr Farage said ‘the engine is running’ and he stood ‘ready for battle’ to fight the Tories and Labour.
It sounds good to me.  The Brexit Party website is at Join now? Way to go.


Brexit Terms [ 18 February 2019 ]
Whilst the Prime Minister may lose the meaningful vote it is worth remembering that it has been enshrined in law that if no agreement is reached then the UK will be leaving on World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules. This could see considerable disruption in the short term for the British economy and for pound to Euro exchange rates.
That is one thing that is certain. Over 80% of world trade is on WTO terms and they survive. Project Fear is being run by liars with an agenda.


Brexit Nausea Exposes Corruption Of The Establishment  [ 14 March 2019 ]
No matter what happens next with Brexit, I’ll always be grateful that I was alive during the past three years – ever since David Cameron announced on February 20, 2016 the date of the EU referendum. This is probably the last truly momentous event in the long and fascinating history of my country that I’ll experience, and it’s been a pleasure and privilege to witness my countrymen coming nearer to becoming actual revolutionaries than anyone ever dreamed they could be.

The vote for Brexit being a revolutionary act, of course the Establishment would fight it tooth and nail, not least in devising the “deal” that Theresa May has spent the past few months flogging.................

But even if we Leavers are denied Brexit, we won’t be forgiven for an achievement which can never be taken from our side; the way the ordinary people of this country have shown The Great And The Good (who found in the European Dream their ultimate feel-good do-nothing playpen-politics) to be a small-minded, mediocre bunch of bullies who would rather defy democracy itself than risk any adjustment to their own sense of entitlement.

Yes, something nasty in the woodshed has been revealed about a sizeable section of British society, but that thing is not the alleged racism of my fellow Brexiteers. It is the long-concealed contempt of the Remainers for most of their fellow citizens.
Julie Burchill is a loud mouthed leftie with little worth saying but she is right about the evil of CameronMay and other traitors who hate Democracy.


Whitehall Civil Servants Actively Sabotaging Brexit  [ 21 March 2019 ]
Should MPs vote again on Theresa May’s Brexit deal, it would be anything but delivering on the Brexit vote from two years ago. How would I know? Because I work within the heart of government.  As a civil servant I can tell you large parts of the Whitehall machine are systematically working against leaving the EU.

I have met thousands of civil servants in the past few years: I can only recall five who voted for Brexit. At first, I thought they were perhaps just staying quiet given the political climate, but my worst fear was confirmed during the high-profile remainer Gina Miller’s successful court case to make sure Parliament has a say on the Brexit outcome. When it was announced she had won her case, I witnessed large teams within the Foreign Office break out into cheers and applause. Seriously.............

This department is particularly notorious for its anti-Brexit bias. My experience tells me that there is a genuine hatred of those who voted for Brexit. I recall my first day in the Civil Service as a graduate, being invited to a meeting of senior members of staff who spent the good part of two hours in agreement that the public made a “stupid” decision in the EU referendum. On June 24 2016 the mood within the civil service was like someone had died.............

But it doesn’t stop there. There is a strong presence of Anglophobia, combined with Cultural Marxism that runs through the civil service. It has meant that many Civil Servants, including myself, have been actively discouraged from co-operating with Think Tanks which are seen as being “too right wing” despite sharing our goal of promoting free trade. This attitude also prevails in our work with our closest allies, particularly in the Commonwealth, where we are afraid to be seen as overly keen to work with countries that are run by “rich white men”.

Contrary to popular belief, Civil Servants often shape the views of Ministers. This makes the prevalent leftist culture within the Civil Service all the more concerning............ The Civil Service is one of the biggest graduate employers, whilst universities have allowed a leftist culture of political correctness to flourish in recent decades.

Brexit is the greatest opportunity this country has faced in years, yet our Government machine is currently working from within to frustrate it. This must not go on. In the next phase of the Brexit negotiations it is vital our civil service ceases to allow the massive remain voting bias that has so far helped scupper our post-Brexit future. 
Are Foreign Office wallahs all pinko poofters? Not quite. The Education Industry is Subverting everything. The Long March Through The Institutions using the top down approach is working well. Destroying Western Civilization is the objective. Immigration is a tool of the Enemy Within. See e.g. the next one.


Operation Quisling  [ 29 March 2019 at 23:00 GMT  ]
Is named after Vidkun Quisling, an infamous Fascist traitor of Norway. He was given a fair trial and shot for his pains. He refused the chance to escape; preferring to face a trial by his own. He had some sense of honour unlike the treacherous swine that run England. It is being run by Theresa May. NB She is all to friendly with Zionist Crazies. If you doubt see Theresa May A Friend Of Israel. Her "achievement" is protecting Israeli war criminals against prosecution - see prosecution of “historic” war crimes on the point.


Top Civil Servant Alleges That Brexit Is Awful [ 6 April 2019 ]
Britain's highest-ranking civil servant has issued a doomsday analysis of how the country would be affected by a No Deal Brexit, as MPs yet again failed to break the deadlock last night. The House of Commons rejected all four alternative Brexit plans in another series of votes last night, leaving Britain with no clear plan just 10 days before a possible cliff-edge exit. 

MPs rejected a customs union and a Norway-style agreement, dealing a blow to Remainer hopes of a soft Brexit, and also voted against a second referendum. The customs union plan proposed by longstanding Tory Europhile Kenneth Clarke was closest to victory - losing by just three votes, 276 to 273. 

But MPs have now rejected 12 'indicative vote' motions and approved none, after trouncing Theresa May's withdrawal agreement three times. 
Believe him? Not me. Recall that Whitehall Civil Servants Are Actively Sabotaging Brexit. Also that the Foreign Office betrayed the Falklands.


The Brexit Party Opposes May's Treason     [ 13 April 2019 ]
Little Miss Mogg joins it.
Nigel Farage launched his new Brexit Party and announced Jacob Rees-Mogg's sister Annunziata as his first star MEP candidate -  after she quit the Tories after 35 years today. The former UKIP leader has vowed to take votes from the 'tarnished' party he left in December and started a new war of words with successor Gerard Batten by claiming he lacks 'good people' and has allowed a 'take over' by the far right.

Launching the party in Coventry today Mr Farage said it is 'no more Mr Nice Guy' before unveiling his secret weapon Ms Rees-Mogg, whose brother told MailOnline today: 'The Brexit Party is fortunate to have such a high calibre candidate but I am sorry that Annunziata has left the Conservative party'.

His younger sister previously stood as a Tory candidate in the 2005 and 2010 general elections and joined the party aged five - but has now jumped ship after Theresa May failed to deliver Brexit. She defected from the Tories to join Mr Farage's revolt today.

The 40-year-old mother-of-one, once one of David Cameron's 'cuties' who refused party requests to 'de-toff' her name to Nancy, blasted MPs, including her older sibling, saying: 'The politicians are not our masters - they are to do our bidding. We need to fight back to take back our democracy. It's as drastic as that. It is our fight and we must fight to win'. She said she had stuck with the Tories 'through thick and thin' but Brexit had been the last straw.

She said: 'But the point at which our Prime Minister will not listen, not only to her membership, but will not listen to the people of her country. I can't sit by and let her do it. We've got to rescue our democracy, we have got to show that the people of this country have a say in how we are run'. 
Miss Rees-Mogg speaks for Democracy; that means against Theresa May & Treason. I will vote for her and Nige.


Brexit Party Likely To Win European Election   [ 18 April 2019 ]
The Brexit Party has surged into the lead in the race for the European Elections after a top pollster predicted Nigel Farage's new party could win its first election.

A second YouGov survey on the state of the party's ahead of EU Parliament elections shows the Brexit Party rising dramatically from 15 per cent to 27 per cent...............

Labour falls to second place on 22 per cent, down two, and the Tories are now third on 15 per cent............... Mr Curtis said a combination of a weak Tory party and Mr Farage's direct attack on UKIP's drift toward the hard right [ sic ] would all help the Brexit Party. 

Adding to the trouble for Theresa May's party are fears of a 'donor strike' amid fury at the Prime Minister's handling of Brexit.
This is good news. Politicians take the voters for granted. That is why Blair & Brown screwed Working Classes. The result was good for the British National Party. Now  May is betraying England so Nigel Farage is back in the game with his brand new Brexit Party. This is a test for the next general election. It is Nigel versus May and Corbyn. They thought they could screw the people of England literally as well as metaphorically. Whence 'Lord' Ahmed of Rotherham getting his collar felt. See the next one.

Brexit Party Leading Polls - Tories Slump To Fifth Place     [ 14 May 2019 ]
Nigel Farage today revealed he will stand to be an MP - calling it 'his duty' - as his Brexit Party looks set to thrash the Tories into fifth place in the upcoming  EU elections.  The former UKIP leader also admitted he would be willing to prop up the next Conservative leader to make them Prime Minister in the event of a hung Parliament - but only if they agree to leave the EU with No Deal on World Trade Organization (WTO) terms. 

He told LBC today: 'I'm going to have to [stand] of course.  It's a duty. We cannot ever allow again a great democratic exercise like this to be railroaded aside by career politicians of the Labour and Tory parties'.................

The Brexit Party is racing ahead with a predicted 34 per cent of the vote on May 23 - but Theresa May's Conservatives are heading for just 10 per cent, a new YouGov survey has found.

This would put the Prime Minister's party in fifth place behind the Greens and the Liberal Democrats, who were on 15 per cent and 11 per cent respectively.
Theresa May chose to betray us. We choose vote against her. Quid pro quo. There is a lesson for the Tories - get rid of her or get out of Parliament. Comrade Corbyn could have won by backing Brexit. He hates Democracy just as much May. 




23 May 2019     

Today WE tell THEM again whether we want slavery inside the European Union or freedom outside. Vote for the Brexit Party, against  May and her Treason, against Corbyn or not. We already have once but that is not good enough for the New Corruption.


Brexit Party Wins European Election - Tories Come Last  [ 28 April 2019 ]
Vote counting is underway across the UK as the nation is eagerly awaiting the European Union election results.

Projections show that turnout has increased up to 38 per cent, an increase of 2 per cent from 2014, and suggest Nigel Farage will secure a historic victory when votes are announced from 10pm this evening. 

The EU elections were not meant to happen in the UK at all, but the failure of the Prime Minister, Parliament and the EU to agree a deal to take Brexit out of the EU means they were scheduled at the last minute.

The last poll before Britons voted put Farage's Brexit Party on 37%, the Lib Dems in second on 19, Labour on 13%, the Greens on 12% and the Conservatives in fifth on 7%.
The result is a bit of a disappointment, with the Tories getting any votes at all. They appointed Theresa May. They allowed her treason. They pay the price.  Now Comrade Corbyn will make his bid for power, using Bribery in the forthcoming general election. Nigel Farage will make his run for Number 10 but be aware of his real policies. His party has too many members of the Revolutionary Communist Party to be accidental. Farage And Treason names names.


The Base Gets Itself A New Elite   [ 30 May 2019 ]
Yes, lots of ink has been spilled over Brexit but.......... Mark Steyn has something important to say and says it well. We don't need them but they need us. May will not be trusted to run a whelk stall and Corbyn has blown it. There will be an election. Pay back time is coming. As Mark tells us:-
Can my old boss Boris Johnson save the day for the Conservatives? Nigel regards him as a slippery duplicitous opportunist. On past form, Boris will pledge to deliver if necessary a no-deal Brexit and then screw everyone over, as is a Tory's wont.
Spot on again.


Brexit And The Manipulators    [ 1 June May 2019 ]
On 23 June 2016, the British people voted to leave the EU.

The danger is that the country will have ‘taken back control’ only to hand it over to corporate lobbyists who see Brexit as 'a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity' to influence the way the UK is run.

Whether that is getting rid of laws and regulations inherited from Europe, including labour standards and environmental regulations, reshaping UK agriculture, or influencing trade policy. Any company or sector that can swing the rules in their favour stands to profit enormously.

So, while the threats to business from Brexit are enormous, so too are the opportunities to profit. We think the British people should be able to see who is lobbying around Brexit and seeking to use it to further their own private interests.
The Referendum was clear; England wanted out. The Welsh were ambivalent. Scotland and Ireland wanted in. Behind the politicians are Big Business and their Useful Idiots. So Powerbase tells us about e.g. Brexit - lobbyists-for-hire but not Theresa May, THE remainer.


Clarke Offers To Run Caretaker Government - So Do I    [ 16 August 2019 ]
I have had just as much practice at it as Clarke. I have never been bribed by Big Tobacco or anyone else.


Brexit Secretary Signs Commencement Order  [ 19 August 2019 ]
Brexit Secretary Stephen Barclay has signed the 'commencement order' formally starting the process that will take Britain out of the EU on October 31. Senior Tory Brexiteers previously said the signing of the document was 'totemic' and a 'do-or-die' pledge confirming the UK will be leaving the EU.

Theresa May had angered Brexiteers by refusing to sign the order and instead agreeing to delay Brexit until October 31........

In a tweet posted today, he said: 'I have signed the legislation setting in stone the repeal of the European Communities Act 1972. 

'This is a landmark moment in taking back control of our law. It underlines that we are leaving the EU on October 31.'
This Commencement Order should mean that the European Communities Act 1972 will be repealed, just as Boris told us.


‘Chaos unseen since WWII’ UK parliament subverts democracy, leaves pre-Brexit Britain ungoverned    [ 4 September 2019 ]
Is George Galloway wrong? Are the Remainers mad, bad or dangerous? All three sounds right. Do these Moral Cretins care about Democracy? NO, they never did! Are they giving Comrade Corbyn and that thug, McDonnell their chance to destroy England? It is time for the Queen to get a grip.


Boris Sacks Parliament  [ 28 August 2019 ]
Boris Johnson's shock move to suspend Parliament received the formality of Royal Ascent [ sic - try Assent ] this afternoon as the Prime Minister seeks to limit Opposition MPs' chances of preventing Brexit on October 31.

But in the aftermath of the carefully choreographed move which saw Jacob Rees-Mogg fly to Balmoral to present the plan to the Queen in person after Her Majesty had a telephone meeting with Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister was accused of being a 'tin pot dictator' and committing 'a constitutional outrage'.

A petition against prorogation looks set to hit a million signatures by midnight and crowds are gathering in Parliament Square waving EU flags and shouting 'stop the coup'.

Former Chancellor Philip Hammond said Parliament would now seek to move anti-no-deal legislation against the Prime Minister next week, although he added he was 'not interested in bringing down the government'. [ He lies - Editor. ]...............

Despite the prorogation only lengthening the planned September break by a few days opponents issued shrieks of outrage.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn accused the PM of a 'constitutional outrage', Commons Speaker John Bercow said it was an 'offence against the democratic process', union bosses said Mr Johnson was acting in a 'dictatorial way' and the EU's Brexit negotiator Guy Verhofstadt described the move as 'sinister'.
Boris acted. Boris got same day approval from that Gracious Sovereign Lady, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. I imagine that she is even more annoyed than the rest of us by the senile delinquents and scum on the make whose duty it is to run the country. Can they run a piss up in a brewery? Evidently not. Does Bercow care tuppence about Democracy? No! Do the rest? Think for yourself. An election is not far off so we will be able to confirm our disgust with the misbegotten, greed driven, light fingered scum.
PS The last(?) time Parliament was gripped like this, early communists, self-righteous rogues like Cromwell decided to act against the Rump Parliament to keep the King, Charles I of England out. This time it is the Queen, Elizabeth II who wants them sorted out.


Mark Steyn Explains Boris And Brexit     [ 29 August 2019 ]
On Wednesday I had the great honor of sitting in for a third day on America's Number One radio show............ Another subject that came up: The prorogation of Parliament in the United Kingdom. Shutting down Westminster until the Queen's Speech in mid-October is designed to ensure that, one way or another, Brexit will happen. So naturally it has sent the Remainers (politicians and media) into paroxysms of fury..........

The problem for Boris' many parliamentary opponents is that the Out-on-October 31st team is united and they're not: The Stop Boris crowd is an alliance of convenience: hardcore Remainers like the Lib Dems, opponents of No Deal like the squishier Tories, and cowardly fence-sitters taking shelter under coy evasions such as a second "People's Vote" like Jeremy Corbyn. They show no sign of being able to get it together sufficiently to prevent Boris taking Britain out of the EU by Halloween. Indeed, the only gift he was bequeathed by the wretched Theresa May was such a belated handover of the keys to Downing Street that the telescoped calendar made votes of confidence and snap elections all but irrelevant.................

The Tory Party will lose any election if Brexit is not put to bed. No-Deal Brexit is the surest way of achieving that. And any deal will be better for Britain if it's negotiated after October 31st than before. On November 1st No Deal becomes a far bigger problem for the EU than for the UK. The above-mentioned backstop boy Leo Varadkar gets that, which is why his general sneering and taunting of Number Ten has lapsed in recent weeks: A hard Irish border is an existential crisis for him, not for Boris. The prospects for German industry and French agriculture and the consequent political fortunes of AfD and Mme Le Pen should also concentrate Euro-minds.
Mark Steyn is spot on again; he says it so well too. BTW Mark  really does know Boris. They both wrote for The Spectator.


General Election Prospects  [ 5 September 2019 ]
The odds of a snap election have soared this week after Boris Johnson tabled a motion for a general election on 15 October. Under the rules of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act, two-thirds of MPs have to back an early election - something that was next scheduled for 2022.

Such a motion was unlikely to pass on Tuesday evening, after Labour, the SNP and the Lib Dems stated that they would not support the motion for an election until the no-deal legislation has been made law - something that might not happen fully until next Monday.

The latest events in parliament follow a whirlwind period since Mr Johnson's victory in the Tory leadership contest in which he has suspended Parliament, pledged billions to public services, and threatened rebel Tory MPs with deselection if they oppose him.
Who would win? The Telegraph doesn't know either. Are MPs all mad? Obviously Corbyn and McDonnell see their chance of power, their chance to destroy England but the rest? An election and sacking the remainers makes sense. Recall what the Weather Underground said:-
#the issue is not the issue, their shorthand for
The issue is not the real issue; it is just an excuse to achieve power.
PS The pound is trading higher against the euro and dollar so people are not panicking.


Boris Can Shut Parliament Says English High Court  [ 12 September 2019 ]
Boris Johnson received a major boost over his highly controversial decision to shut down Parliament ahead of Brexit today as senior judges said it could not be legally challenged.

After the Prime Minister's divisive move to prorogue the Commons for five weeks, sparking Remainer uproar, was deemed illegal by judges in Scotland, the High Court in London revealed that it viewed the situation completely differently. In giving their reasons for throwing out a case brought by Remainer businesswoman Gina Miller, justices in London said the decision which closed down parliament on Monday was 'purely political' and therefore 'not a matter for the courts'...............

In their judgment, they stated: 'We concluded that the decision of the Prime Minister was not justiciable (capable of challenge). It is not a matter for the courts.'

They added: 'The Prime Minister's decision that Parliament should be prorogued at the time and for the duration chosen and the advice given to Her Majesty to do so in the present case were political.

'They were inherently political in nature and there are no legal standards against which to judge their legitimacy.'
The Jocks are doing what was done at the Nuremberg War Trials, inventing law after deciding what their chosen verdict is. They are co-conspirators in Mutiny, a criminal conspiracy...............  to openly oppose, change, or overthrow a lawful authority to which they are subject. NB this ghastly Miller woman is a Third World alien, a Sikh from British Guyana being incited by the Jew she is currently married to. If the Supreme Court goes wrong [ all too likely ] the High Court of Parliament can invite them to fornicate elsewhere. Recall that Cromwell, an arrogant thug shut down Parliament. Perhaps it is time for that Gracious Sovereign Lady, Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II to follow suit.


Liberal Democrats Vote To Ignore Referendum Result    [ 16 September 2019 ]
So Democrats hate Democracy but hypocrites like hypocrisy. Recall that when they were the Liberal Party they were kicked out of office for their corruption, for selling knighthoods etc.


Boris Can Beat Parliament With An Order Of Council
Sir John [ Major ] highlighted the method the Prime Minister will use to force a no deal through the House of Commons at the end of October this year – a statutory instrument known as an Order of Council. If an Order of Council is instigated the move would circumvent and suspend Remainer legislation known as the Benn Act which has banned the Prime Minister from leaving the EU without a deal – allowing Mr Johnson freer rein to negotiate a Brexit deal. On the BBC’s Question Time last night Tory Chairman James Cleverly refused to rule out an Order of Council and said: “I’m not going to discuss how we progress with this.”
Someone does not know the difference between a Statutory Instrument and an Order of Council. But Boris has the power; he just needs the sense to use it.


Former Supreme Court Judge Says 52 Percent Can Not Have Brexit   [ 28 September 2019 ]
Former Supreme Court Judge Lord Sumption told the BBC this morning that “52% of the electorate simply cannot have 100% of the spoils, they have to engage with the rest”. Rather letting the cat out of the bag.

The referendum was a binary choice, Leave or Remain. If the vote had been to Remain, Britain would not have semi-Brexited, it would have 100% remained in the EU. The British political system is adversarial, very adversarial currently, it usually results in clear outcomes. When a candidate wins a single vote more than their opponents they do get in fact 100% of the spoils. When Tony Blair won just 35% of the vote and 55% of the seats in parliament he still dominated British politics and remade centuries of constitutional order. Creating the Supreme Court for example…
Is Sumption a fool or a liar? He cannot possibly be stupid enough to believe this allegation but hopes we are. He shows rather adequately that the Supreme Court is a bunch of chancers with an agenda. Their verdict has bugger all to do with the law.  NB He was talking to the BBC, a bunch of Marxist Paedophiles and traitors.


Boris Brexit Plan Rejected Sight Unseen By EU  [ 3 October 2019 ]
BORIS JOHNSON’S “take-it-or-leave-it” Brexit offer has sparked fury in Brussels and is unlikely going to end in a deal, European sources have warned.

Diplomats and officials have slammed the Prime Minister for attempting to corner EU leaders into throwing Leo Varadkar under the bus. The proposals would pull Northern Ireland out of the EU customs union when the UK leaves, while keeping it aligned with the bloc’s rulebook for agri-food and industrial goods for a four-year period. "If this is the final offer, then there is not a deal to be had", said one EU official.

Brussels is concerned that plan to replace the controversial Northern Ireland backstop creates a “hard border” and does not do enough to protect the Good Friday Peace agreement.

It would effectively create two borders after the transition period ends in 2021 – one between Great Britain and Northern Ireland good declarations and a customs border on the island of Ireland.
Her Majesty's Government has succeeded in running the country and the world's largest empire, one of the best incidentally. Now remainers seem to think that we need to be a colony of European Union. They despise us, the little people who think  we can run our own lives. Democracy is just a nuisance, a word they wave around from time to time when they are lying to us.


Parliament Betrays Us Again By Voting To Delay Brexit   [ 19 October 2019 ]
Brexit vote result: MPs vote to delay UK's exit AGAIN - Letwin plot sabotages new EU deal
If Johnson actually wanted a clean break he would have talked with Nigel Farage rather than refusing his help. He can still use the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 albeit David Green, a homosexual lawyer says not; he might be right. See The Civil Contingencies Act 2004 is not an Enabling Act for Brexiteers. Recall that Cromwell didn't put up with these hooligans. An action replay makes lotsa sense. Or the Queen could sack the lot and call an election.


Boris Agreed, Juncker Agreed - It Is Treason - Just Like May's   [ 19 October 2019 ]
At this important time, I want to update you on The Brexit Party’s thoughts on Boris’ proposed deal. The truth is that it would be BRINO, Brexit in name only. We have always stood for a Clean-Break Brexit so we can maximise the Brexit opportunities. 

This deal is still a really bad deal. Apart from unnecessarily paying £39 billion, the Political Declaration — which sets the basis for the future Free Trade Agreement with the EU — is full of traps and pitfalls. Despite the warm words, it will heavily restrict our foreign policy and military independence as well as policies on trade, tax, fishing, the environment, social and employment law, competition and state aid. We will have to operate on a “level playing field”. We would not be able to become a high growth, low tax, smartly regulated economy, which the EU is terrified that we could become. 

If Boris’ treaty is passed, a transition period of over three years is likely — when we have no voice, no vote and no veto — as the EU sets new rules and laws that discriminate against us. 

Any short-term temptation to back this deal will result in huge medium-term regret. It would be a historic mistake. A Clean-Break Brexit is still the right way forward.
Why did Juncker and Barnier agree? Because they are enemies of England. It is Trahison des Clercs, treason of the quasi-intellectuals. Is Boris pandering to aliens? Is he like Chamberlain at Munich? It was Appeasement then and now. The Brexit Party has a clear vision of freedom. Nigel Farage is right.


Brexit Party Has Two Important Roles When Johnson Betrays Us   [ 19 October 2019 ]
Saturday’s sitting in the House of Commons, the first in 37 years, will see the Prime Minister try to deliver his Brexit agreement, which he agreed with the bloc earlier this week. Mr Johnson has repeatedly vowed to deliver Brexit by the end of this month, and will try to get his deal over the line on Saturday, as he tries to lure Labour MPs and former Tory MPs to back his agreement. But, a Brexit Party MEP has outlined what role his party will play if Mr Johnson’s deal gets enough votes from lawmakers.

Speaking to, John Longworth, explained the two important things his party must continue to do, even if the Prime Minister secures his deal. The former director-general of the British Chambers of Commerce said: “I think the Brexit Party has an important role in doing two things, should the Prime Minister’s Brexit deal pass in the House of Commons.

“One, is clearing out this usurper Parliament that we have got, full of people who are opposing the will of the people..............

He added: “The other important role the Brexit Party will play is holding the Government to account, whatever the Government is, to deliver a proper Brexit in those negotiations.
Our wonderful Parliament is a mutinous assemblage treating its Oath Of Allegiance as a triviality. Johnson has a track record of betraying womenfolk. May tried it on too but note that she was chosen by Tories in Parliament. The Liberal Democrat Party loathes Democracy, it hates the will of the people, the Referendum, in fine they are power crazed rogues. Now Comrade Corbyn has had his chance to take a principled position; he has none except a monstrous lust for power.


Jew Attacks Brexit              [ 20 October 2019 ]
The Jew, 'Sir' Oliver Letwin led another procedural attack on Brexit. 322 rogues versus 302 MPs in Parliament went along with him. Recall that the crooked little Jew, Berkowitz is abusing his position as the Speaker of the House of Commons to obstruct it. Also that the Jew Alan Miller attacked the Referendum result using his wife, a Third World alien Sikh from Guyana Gina Miller.


Brexit's Ninth Circle Of Treachery   [ 21 October 2019 ]
The continuance of any nation depends on whether its people are loyal and, if necessary, sufficiently motivated to fight for it. In Australia, after British settlement and before Federation, most settlers felt a primary loyalty to Britain, on whose protection they relied for their security, with a secondary loyalty to each settler’s particular colony.......................

As for Britain itself, it is now largely divided between those whose primary loyalty is to the United Kingdom and those who have, or who appear to be in the process of transferring, their primary loyalty to the European Union.....................

Currently, a majority of members of the British Parliament are using every manoeuvre available to prevent Brexit, all the while proclaiming the sovereignty of parliament.  But considered in isolation, the concept of parliamentary sovereignty has no more validity than the old concept of the Divine right of kings.  Western civilisation is built on the sovereignty of the individual, and in the United Kingdom it is individual electors who, through their votes, lend their sovereignty to MPs to exercise it on their behalf.............

A majority of MPs has now reneged on this promise and, by refusing an election, revoked their own legitimacy as representatives of the people. They clearly no longer believe the people are worthy of their loyalty.  The golden thread of British democracy has been broken.................

The epic fourteenth century poem, Dante's Inferno, records the poet’s journey through the nine circles of Hell, guided by the poet Virgil who has been sent to ensure that no harm comes to him............... 

Finally reaching the very centre of Hell, Dante meets Satan himself, who is described as a three-headed beast, each head eating a specific traitor – the left mouth Brutus, the right mouth Cassius, both betrayers of Julius Caesar, and the middle mouth Judas Iscariot, the betrayer of Christ.

A modern Dante would no doubt find some different characters to fill the roles described. [ Theresa May & Boris Johnson come to mind. Add in Comrade Corbyn for a trifecta.]
Antony Carr, a literary man explains. Notice that our wonderful lawmakers are keeping very quiet about the next election and about Democracy.


David Davis warns of Brexit delay as EU will accept extension due to huge no deal risks     [ 21 October 2019 ]
David Davis was in 21 SAS so he served Queen and Country unlike Johnson and a very large majority in Parliament. Did he mention that the Johnson deal is dreadful? Quite possibly but the Express left that bit out.


Jew Attacks Brexit Again    [ 1 November 2019 ]
A Third World alien, a Sikh from Guyana Gina Miller is fronting this attack on Democracy and the will of the people. She is colluding with her husband, Alan Miller who is one of the Jews against us. Andrew Joyce has something to say about the perpetrators - see Jews Are Leading the Legal Fight Against Brexit. Recall the words of Vladimir Bukovsky RIP, a leading Soviet dissident.
In EUSSR, a booklet written with Pavel Stroilov and published in 2004, Bukovsky exposed what he saw as the "Soviet roots of European Integration". [87] Two years later, in an interview with The Brussels Journal, [88] Bukovsky said he had read confidential documents from secret Soviet files in 1992 which confirmed the existence of a "conspiracy" to turn the European Union into a socialist organisation. The European Union was a "monster", he argued, and it must be destroyed, the sooner the better, "before it develops into a full-fledged totalitarian state". [89]
You might compare Palestine, the Stolen Land that thieves call Israel with the USSR. Jews are worse than the Russians; they want Tyranny & oppression.
PS The app Miller is promoting works both ways. Go to Tactical Vote, feed in your post code then decide who you want.


Tories Use Bribery To Buy Off Brexit Party Candidates  [ 15 November 2019 ]
Nigel Farage faces a major Brexit Party revolt tonight after candidates dramatically stood down at the eleventh hour [ allegedly ] to avoid splitting the Eurosceptic vote. A furious Mr Farage has tonight threatened to report the Tories to the police for allegedly bribing his candidates with peerages and government jobs to stand aside.

The Conservative Party deny the allegations which, if true, would contravene Section 107 Corrupt withdrawal from candidature  of the Representation of the People Act 1983

Dudley North hopeful Rupert Lowe and Andy Wood, who was due to fight Hove, withdrew just before the 4pm deadline for nominations. The late pull-out means Mr Farage cannot replace them - and the Brexit Party leader voiced fury this evening claiming they had been offered peerages..........

A clearly livid Mr Farage said: 'Even Boris Johnson’s Chief Strategic Adviser Sir Lister is calling our candidates and offering them jobs if they withdraw. The system is corrupt and broken.' 
The timing was clearly malicious. No doubt Johnson and Lister will deny everything. They are just as intent on screwing us as May, by using BRINO, BRexit In Name Only. Lister looks like a wrong 'un but then he is Johnson's mate.


Brexit Party Contract With The People        [ 23 November 2019 ]
A lot of it is good. Getting rid of HS2 makes real sense. It has already cost billions, or is it only millions? But not a foot of railway has been laid. Getting rid of the House of Lords might sound good but gets us that much nearer to a Tyranny run by Socialists as distinct from the current bunch of thieving rogues in Parliament.


Boris Johnson Wins Election - England Loses - Brexit Betrayed   [ 13 December 2019 ]
Boris Johnson hailed the political 'earthquake' that has given him a 'mandate to get Brexit done' today as he marched his new blue-collar Tory army towards a staggering election landslide.

After laying waste to Labour's 'red wall' of Leave-backing strongholds, the PM said he had been given a 'powerful' vote of confidence by the British people and vowed to 'rise to the challenge'. 

The promise came with experts forecasting the Conservatives are on track to rack up 364 seats in the first December election for nearly a century, with Labour collapsing to 203 - down 59 on 2017. The Tories formally crossed the winning line of 325 seats just after 5am. 

Jeremy Corbyn announced this morning that he will quit as leader in the wake of the humiliation, petulantly swiping at 'disgusting' media attacks on him, saying he still believed his hard-Left platform was 'popular', and blaming Brexit for preventing 'normal political debate'. However, he made clear he would stay on for a period of 'reflection' while a replacement was selected.  
Boris Johnson wins, England loses. We voted for Brexit - we will get BRINO, Brexit in name only. Theresa May betrayed us. Johnson is doing the same. He now has five years to treat us like he treats his women folk; we are screwed by corrupt mutineers.  What will The Tories and the rest of the political class do to us? Carry on importing vicious Third World parasites. See below.


Sterling Up Due To Election      [ 13 December 2019 ]
At 21.50GMT it was EUR1.18334. An hour later, at 22.50 it was 1.20732, a change of 2%. Perhaps that does not sound like a lot but currency traders are out there moving millions or billions. This makes it important money for the City; it is no great help to the rest of us. Really sincere Capitalist Swine were there like flies on the proverbial.


Johnson's Withdrawal Agreement Passing Through Parliament             [ 21 December 2019 ]
This Withdrawal Agreement wasn't negotiated by Boris Johnson and European Union apparatchiks. What is this agreement? Why have the foreigners gone very quiet? Why have the Liberal Democrats and the Mainstream Media, the opponents of Brexit stopped objecting? It is because this is May's offering repackaged. What does it say? Pass but it takes 541 pages to do it. Does anyone know what it says and, more importantly what it means? Does Johnson? I seriously doubt it. He is Jack the Lad when it comes to betraying his womenfolk. Now he is betraying us. You can read what they are inflicting on us at the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community. You can also emigrate. Various major Tory donors are doing just that.


Britain's Economic Growth To Take Off In 2020 - Once Final Brexit Deal Is Complete  [ 27 December 2019 ]
Economic growth is set to take off from almost nothing in the final few months of this year to a solid rate at the end of 2020 and potentially a faster pace in the years ahead once the final Brexit deal is complete.

However, a sharp boom is unlikely as businesses and traders await full details of the post-Brexit deal with the EU, preparing the way for a pickup in growth in 2021 and beyond.

The new year should get an immediate boost from extra government spending, firstly on day-to-day consumption and then on investment once more money is ploughed into infrastructure, analysts predict. 
Believe it if you want. The Telegraph is a propaganda machine lying to us about Brexit. It is called The Quislinggraph with reason. Recall that the Mainstream Media went quiet about Johnson's Withdrawal Agreement; in fact they all did including the remainers and the Brussels mob. It does not take 541 pages of turgid waffle to set us free; it does reduce us to a slave state. Read the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself.


Brussels Attacking Brexit  [ 28 December 2019 ]
Brussels is planning to target the UK's strength as a financial centre after Brexit as it prepares for fiery trade deals with Britain, it emerged today. The EU will threaten City firms with a lack of access to continental markets unless it agrees to maintain 'equivalence' - a level playing field for rules and regulations.

British commerce could also lose access to important data flows under plans being prepared by the bloc. With Brexit expected to happen smoothly on January 31, the following 11 month are expected to see frenetic activity to establish at least an outline trade deal by December 2020.

But Boris Johnson has already signalled that he intends for the UK to diverge in many areas from EU standards and systems as it seeks a business advantage over the continent.   'These are both big levers for the EU,' an EU source told the Times.

'Data adequacy and equivalence are decisions under our direct control, decisions that can be reversed at any time and that will be linked to progress in the wider negotiations.' 
The Brussels mob kept very quiet about Brexit before Election 2019 because they detest Nigel Farage. He has told them to their faces that they are bunch of wasters many times. See him do it on YouTube and see their loathing. But attacking the City of London was always on the agenda. It moves gigabucks everyday. They want a slice of the action but Frankfurt and Paris are just amateurs on the make.


Nigel Farage says Boris Johnson is taking Britain 'to the right place'  [ 29 December 2019 ]
Nigel Farage has given his blessing to Boris Johnson's Brexit blueprint even though he conceded it would not meet all of his demands.

The Brexit Party leader praised the Prime Minister for driving the country to 'the right place' but braced his supporters for compromises on key negotiation battlegrounds such as fisheries.

Longtime figurehead of the Eurosceptic movement, Mr Farage has over the years banged the drum for a prosperous Britain outside of the UK, which would see a massive return of powers from Brussels.

Yet as divorce from the bloc now appears certain, he has admitted the future trade deal will likely be a watered down from his ideal Brexit vision.

In an interview on LBC, he said: 'As a Brexiteer, I know I'm not going to get everything I want. That's just not possible. 

'There are going to be all sorts of compromises on fishing, I'm sure. But have we turned the corner? Are we heading to the right place? Yes.'
Nigel rolls with the punches. Without him there would have been no deal, only May's treasonous stitch up.


No Deal Exit Is Back On The Table As Brussels Sabotages Negotiation  [ 23 January 2020 ]
Ministers have quietly restarted No Deal planning meetings amid fears trade talks with Brussels will collapse, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

Whitehall's EU Exit Operations committee – dubbed XO and chaired by Michael Gove – met on Thursday to begin preparations for a 'disorderly December', should Brussels 'fail to grasp we really are going at the end of the year', said a Cabinet Minister who was present.

Our revelation comes after Dominic Cummings warned that Brussels has not yet 'woken up' to Britain's negotiating position – and would not for several weeks yet.
WTO terms are plenty good enough for most of the world. They will do just fine for us. Do we need European Union and tin pot tyrants like Juncker? No but Mercedes and BMW want us. If you can't walk away from a negotiation it is not really trading.


Brexit And Freedom Day      [ 1 February 2020 ]
Three years, seven months, and eight days after voting to Leave, Britain will finally break free from the European Union at 11pm tonight. We will be celebrating in Parliament Square and all are welcome to join. If you can't make it, keep an eye on our social media for the live stream starting from 9pm..........

Boris' 'Deal' is better than May's but it is far from perfect. Tomorrow, the 11-month 'transition period' begins along with an intensive period of negotiations. There will be many key battles to come, including resisting the EU's demands for us to obey their courts and adopt "total alignment" – which would keep us chained to all their rules – as well as securing full control over our territorial fishing waters and borders and protecting the integrity of the UK. 

The Brexit Party is not going away. We are the insurance policy. If the Prime Minister backslides on his promises we will be here to hold him to account and ensure we get the proper Brexit we voted for..............

We have won the war but now we must win the peace. We must secure a future arrangement with the EU whereby we trade and cooperate as friends and equals. The Remainer establishment is still organizing – including many in the media, big business, House of Lords, and the courts – after trying to block Brexit and force a second referendum. Now, they are pushing for "close alignment" to watered-down Brexit, which could be worse than membership. 
Richard Tice speaks. He looks all right.


Boris Johnson 'Infuriated' As EU Reneges On Free Trade Deal   [ 2 February 2020 ]
Boris Johnson has become "privately infuriated" with what he sees as the EU's attempts to frustrate a comprehensive free trade deal, the Sunday Telegraph can reveal. The Prime Minister believes Brussels has unilaterally been "changing the terms" of the deal he agreed last year, when both sides set out to work towards an ambitious and deep trade agreement. As a result the UK is no longer wedded to a Canada-style agreement, in what would be a major hardening in the Government's Brexit strategy.

Downing Street negotiators are now willing to pursue a much "looser" trade deal while simultaneously signing agreements with countries that make up 13 per cent of the world's GDP......................

In a speech to business leaders, ambassadors and think tank representatives in London, he will say the UK must be treated as an "equal" and make clear there will be "no alignment, no jurisdiction of the European courts, and no concessions" with Brussels.

The speech will come just as EU leaders set out their draft strategy ahead of a tense 11 months of negotiations before the post-Brexit implementation period agreed between London and Brussels comes to an end on Dec 31.
Yes, of course the Brussels mob are going to be a pain in the rectum; they have never been anything else. It is why they used Barnier. Life goes on. Taxing imports such as Mercedes would bring the pains on - for them. NB The headline is verbatim.


Brussels Will Back Spain Against Gibraltar   [ 3 February 2020 ]
The EU is set to back Spain's claim to Gibraltar and give Madrid the power to exclude the Rock from a future Brexit trade deal, according to reports. 

In the latest move by Spain to take advantage of Brexit to stake its claim on the Rock, Madrid have said Gibraltar must be mentioned in the EU's initial negotiating position to be published on Monday.

It said Gibraltar should be left out of Britain's new relationship with the EU unless Spain gives explicit permission for the contrary, Observer reports.
Brussels comes out fighting; it never did it any other way. It hates us, it hates Democracy, it hates Brexit. It is why they used Barnier.  Of course the Spanish will want to keep Ceuta and Melilla, their pointless little toeholds in North Africa; they are different somehow. It is the same with the Canary Islands off the coast of Morocco. Gibraltar is not irrelevant, not worthless, being a strategically important Choke point for the Royal Navy. Another is the Strait of Hormuz. A quarter of the world's oil goes through it - or not. It gives Iran the power to stop American hooligans invading.



Sean Gabb's Brexit Post Script
Yesterday evening – that is, the 31st January 2020 – at 11pm GMT, my country left the European Union. We did so after four years of heated and often hysterical argument. Nothing much seemed to have changed this morning. I went out shopping, to see the same people buying the same things at the same prices. Since we are now in a transition period, lasting till the end of this year, in which we remain within the Single Market and subject to the rules of the European Union, it would have been odd if anything visible had changed. Yet, if nothing visible had changed, one very important thing has changed.

The ruling class has suffered its first serious defeat in living memory. The coalition of politicians, bureaucrats, lawyers, educators, media people and associated business interests who draw wealth and power from an extended state was committed to European Union membership. This coalition was never uniformly committed to membership. Some elements were strongly committed, others only mildly. But all were agreed that membership was good for them, so far as it blurred the lines of accountability and gave the exercise of power a supranational appearance. This was the position before the 2016 Referendum, which was not expected to go as it did. When the result was to leave, ruling class support for membership strengthened. Long before it ended, the referendum campaign had become a vote of confidence in the ruling class. Losing this vote was a shock. The people could not be given what they had asked for. It would set a precedent. Give them that, and they would start believing they lived in a democracy where votes counted for something. If this happened, the people might be inclined to start asking for other things – all things variously unwelcome within the ruling class.

The ruling class response to losing fell under two headings. One was to deny the validity of the vote and to demand another, and to make sure that this one was rigged in favour of remaining. The other was to deliver an exit so partial [ Theresa May's approach ] that it amounted to continued membership, and that could be upgraded to full membership after a few years of propaganda. These responses eventually merged into a single project of dragging things out so long that the people would get bored and stop demanding that their voice should be heard.

These responses failed. The people had spoken, and they continued speaking – eventually giving the Conservatives their biggest majority in a generation............

I have mentioned the bad faith of our own rulers. But the European Union also overplayed its hand. It could have put on a sad face, and entered into one of those “constructive dialogues” that give negotiating parties nearly everything they think essential, and leave no bitter aftertaste. Instead, the central institutions and the member states put on very hard faces and insisted on treating us like a defeated or beggared nation with nowhere else to turn.

It may be that they wanted to make us an example to any other member state inclined to leave. It may be that they saw the political deadlock in London as an excuse for paying us back for everything we had done to them since Crecy and Agincourt.

And so we are leaving. Since yesterday, we have been outside the political union. We have another eleven months inside the economic union. During this transition, we can try to arrange a satisfactory close relationship. If this cannot be arranged, we are at perfect liberty to walk away and trade with the European Union on the same basis as we trade with Ecuador and Vietnam.............

The people of my country have stood firm. How firm will the American people stand this coming November?
Sean Gabb, England's leading Libertarian gets it right. Yes, the Establishment got screwed. Now the American Deep State is betraying their country and losing, in some respects. They hate Donald Trump but their propaganda failed. So did their fraudulent Impeachment of Don. Now we can look forward to him winning the November election.


Barnier Warns Of Grave Differences Between EU And UK In Trade Talks    [ 20 May 2020 ]
Barnier knew there were going to be grave differences.; he caused them. This is good news in fact. We walk away; Brexit succeeds so we work on WTO terms. Boris Johnson can't betray us without dooming The Tories and giving Nigel Farage a chance to move his mistress into Number 10.


Dominic Cummings Was Hounded Out Of Office Because He Blocked Sabotage Of Brexit - Allegedly  [ 25 May 2020 ]


Bank Of England Says Brexit Talks Likely To Fail  [ 5 June 2020 ]
The Bank of England has warned the City to brace for Brexit trade talks to fail, it was claimed today. Governor Andrew Bailey is said to have delivered the message in a call with industry chiefs this week.

The alert came amid rising concern among businesses about the deadlock in negotiations. Nissan has suggested its Sunderland plant will 'not be sustainable' unless there are zero tariffs in future. According to Sky News, the Brexit situation was 'the number one agenda item' for Mr Bailey's discussions with banks yesterday. 

City minister John Glen told a webinar today that that the UK's financial services industry is 'world class' and ready for any Brexit outcome. 'I continue to believe that we are still well placed as a sector, whatever the specific outcomes are of negotiations ahead of us in the second half of this year,' he said.

Downing Street has accused the EU of wishful thinking for suggesting the UK is bound to back down over access to fishing waters and following Brussels standards.
Barnier does not want an agreement; that is just fine. We walk away and trade on WTO terms just like the rest of the world. Of course the Brussels mob are trying it on. The French are prone to be difficult from time to time. So shut the Channel Tunnel and go via Rotterdam. The Dutch won't mind, not even slightly. French treachery involves importing more Illegal Immigrants. more Third World parasites in collusion with Priti Patel, Her Majesty's Home Secretary. In her case it is Treason too. See the next one.


French Complain That We Have Not Given Them Total  Surrender   [ 7 June 2020 ]
EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier accused the UK of backtracking on a key agreement in post-Brexit trade talks today, as British officials revealed they have  abandoned plans to walk away from the negotiations by the end of the month. [ A great pity - Editor

Boris Johnson intimated in February that June would be the time for reflection' on whether a deal with Brussels was possible before the transition period end in December.

But as talks between the two sides remained mired in deadlock today, the UK Government indicated it wanted talks to continue into July to allow an agreement to be reached...........

On the key area of fisheries, he said the UK has 'not shown any true will' to explore compromises. And he said both sides were still 'very far' from reaching agreement on the level playing field, nuclear safety and anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism funding.'     
Regarding Money Laundering etc. it is just a matter of picking up the phone and talking. Barnier does not want agreement, just surrender. Fortunately Boris can't betray us on this one because he has Nigel Farage and the Brexit Party waiting to wipe the Tories out.


French Minister Says No Deal Brexit Is Better Than A Bad Deal      [ 31 July 2020 ]
The man is right; it just means that we trade on WTO terms. No doubt they will cause trouble after 31 December 2020. On answer is shutting the Channel Tunnel and using Rotterdam instead. The Dutch won't mind. May's treachery has failed. She just slowed things down.


Foreigners Turn Nasty After Boris Tells Them To Stop Stalling  [ 12 September 2020 ]
The European Union has urged ministers to back down on plans to override the Withdrawal Agreement [ All 599 pages of it - Editor ] or face the collapse of trade talks. In a statement, the European Commission urged the Government to amend the Internal Market Bill by the end of the month or "risk the ongoing future relationship negotiation".

It follows emergency talks between Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove and the Commission's Vice President Maros Sefcovic. Mr Sefcovic told his counterpart that if the Bill were to be adopted as it stands it would "constitute an extremely serious violation of the Withdrawal Agreement and of international law".

He told Mr Gove that by putting forward the legislation, the UK has "seriously damaged trust between the EU and the UK".

The Vice President also threatened legal action, saying the Brexit divorce deal contained "a number of mechanisms and legal remedies to address violations of the legal obligations contained in the text".
The Mainstream Media eagerly ignore the fact that we were dragged into Europe by a fat, treacherous Paedophile with an unwholesome interest in choir boys and brown envelopes. See Treason At Maastricht for more and better details. Two co-conspirators were Hurd and Maude,




The UK has to defend itself against predatory diplomacy, deal or no deal  [ 17(?) September 2020 ]
The UK has to defend itself against predatory diplomacy, deal or no deal

Europe’s refusal to offer its neighbour and security ally even a bare-bones trade deal is a hostile posture that has consequences [ says ] Ambrose Evans-Pritchard 13 September 2020

Michel Barnier allegedly threatened a trade blockade against Northern Ireland. If true, there is no going back to the status quo ante

If the UK were about to violate international law and resile from the Northern Ireland Protocol, it would be a very grave matter. 

But a potent allegation has been made that suggests something closer the opposite. We need to know whether or not the EU negotiating team cynically misused its stranglehold control over the Withdrawal Agreement [ All 599 pages of it - Editor ] to twist its intent, and in so doing breached the EU’s obligations of good faith and subverted the Good Friday peace accord.  

If it is true that Michel Barnier “explicitly” threatened to obstruct exports and food supplies from Great Britain to Ulster by means of an extreme and malicious interpretation of the Protocol – as the Prime Minister asserts – it is the EU that is playing fast and loose with international law, and arguably crossing a line into geopolitical vandalism. 

If it is not true, this country needs a new government immediately. The facts will out. 

What is already apparent is the collective insouciance of the EU elites over the fate of Ulster’s Unionist community, as if its cause were not really legitimate. One notes, too, a striking unwillingness by EU officials even to consider whether their own Rottweilers might be going too far. 

One would hardly know from the public discussion that the underlying issue at stake is a conflict between two incompatible treaties and legal-political arrangements. 

But before entering the legal thickets of the Protocol, it is relevant to point out that the EU is a practised abuser of international law. It frequently finesses or ignores treaty obligations that conflict with its core interest. Pacta sunt servanda [ agreements must be kept ] tweeted Ursula von der Leyen last week. Well, quite. 

The EU has systematically refused to comply with the judgments of the World Trade Organisation, flouting rulings on GMO crops, hormone beef, and Airbus subsidies, as if the matter were optional. It has repudiated the doctrine of legal supremacy and “direct effect”, the very doctrine that the EU now asserts in the Withdrawal Agreement.  

It has eroded direct effect in a series of cases, culminating in Commission v Portugal where the European Court ruled that the EU has no obligation to follow WTO law if it narrows the European Commission’s scope for manoeuvre. How delicious. 

The ECJ ruled in the Kadi-Barakaat case that the EU should disregard the UN Charter, the highest text of international law, if the Charter is at odds with the EU’s internal constitutional order. 

This is not to say that the EU is the most egregious scoff-law of the Western world but rather that it picks and chooses when it will be bound by international law like everybody else. It will not sacrifice core interests, and it is surely the UK’s core interests that are at stake right now as the Internal Market Bill heads for a its second reading. 

The Northern Ireland Protocol was agreed on the assumption that Brussels would agree to an off-the-shelf ‘Canada-Japan-Korea’ trade deal with no bells and whistles – as Mr Barnier himself had offered – and therefore that there would be no more than a light-touch trade border between Britain and Ulster. On that basis the Unionists said they could live with it.  

The EU has since moved the goalposts. The prospect of a no-deal rupture and intra-UK trade tariffs has constitutional implications for Northern Ireland, creating a much harder trade border in Irish Sea than the Unionists supposed. It therefore intrudes ineluctably on the Good Friday peace accord.

It is too glib by half to say that Boris Johnson signed up to the Agreement and therefore that it is his own fault.

It is equally glib to dismiss the invocation of the Good Friday accord as a canard. It takes some chutzpah to claim that a hard (electronic) tariff border on the island of Ireland is a grave threat to peace, but that a near identical tariff border down the Irish Sea is of no significance even though it severs constituent parts of the UK and covers ten times as much trade.

The Good Friday accord is also an international treaty. The Withdrawal Agreement cannot override it and impose a new constitutional regime on the Unionists without their consent. The UK internal market bill is therefore a necessary safeguard. It is to be activated only in the case of emergency, should the EU act on the Barnier threats and further weaponise the Protocol.

It beggars belief that Brandon Lewis [ a fat, self-satisfied twerp - Editor ] should tell the world that the new legislation “does break international law in a very specific and limited way” when its deeper purpose is to prevent a breach of international law. Had he framed the matter with more skill – and more accuracy – he might have spared some considerable damage to the reputation of this country.

Article 5 of the Protocol states that Northern Ireland is part of the UK customs territory and that there should be no tariffs on goods shipped across the Irish Sea from Britain unless they are re-exported to the Republic, a trivial amount that could be ring-fenced easily. 

But the sub-clauses take away this protection, giving the EU extraordinary powers, should it wish to abuse them. The default setting is that all shipments into Northern Ireland are to be deemed “at risk” – obliging HMRC to collect tariffs – unless the EU agrees to a narrow list. Furthermore, Article 10 gives the EU a lever of control over the UK’s entire state aid and industrial policy by tenuous linkage to Ulster.

The allegation is that Mr Barnier played these incendiary cards in an effort to browbeat Boris Johnson into submission on the broader trade talks. Once such a card is played, there is no going back to the status quo ante.

It is a near reflexive tendency in EU circles to argue that the UK brought this state of affairs upon itself (which I dispute, but that is to relitigate Brexit) and that as the smaller party it should expect to be pushed around, that ‘strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must’ as the Melians were told.

This has consequences. “If you start playing the relationship talks in the spirit of a geopolitical power game, don’t be surprised when the other side plays in the same spirit,” says Eurointelligence. 

We now have a stand-off and an EU ultimatum of 20 days, and no flicker of recognition yet from any EU leader that their own side might be behaving badly.

German finance minister Olaf Scholz says a no-deal outcome will have “very harsh consequences” for the UK economy but that the EU will muddle through just fine. Up to a point, Count Copper.

The question is whether the EU is willing to jeopardise its £95bn trade surplus with the UK and inflict damage on its own industries, for which it is less prepared than Mr Scholz pretends, and to do so for an ideological purpose: forcing the UK to accept the EU’s extra-territorial supremacy over state aid policy and standards, a means of eviscerating British independence.

The UK is being offered extremely little in these talks, and is asking for extremely little. Mr Scholz is therefore misframing the equation. If the EU wants to save a deal and preserve its large export acquis on this island, it will have to give up this colonial demand.  

At the end of the day, Europe’s refusal to offer its immediate neighbour and security ally even a bare-bones Canada trade deal is a hostile posture. 

The EU could have opted for subtler statecraft, recognising that Brexit requires a fundamental rethink about the EU’s near abroad, a chance to create an outer ring of friendly trading nations that do not wish to be locked into an emerging unitary state. Instead it has driven the UK further away. Historians will judge this to have been a strategic failure of the first order. 

This final squalid slide towards an acrimonious rupture is sad for those of us who love l’Europe des Patries. But the UK has to defend itself against predatory diplomacy, deal or no deal.
We dug the Frogs out from under Brer Hun twice at a price in blood and treasure. Are they grateful? NO! 


Good Faith ex Wiki   
In contract law, the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is a general presumption that the parties to a contract will deal with each other honestly, fairly, and in good faith, so as to not destroy the right of the other party or parties to receive the benefits of the contract. It is implied in a number of contract types in order to reinforce the express covenants or promises of the contract. A lawsuit (or a cause of action) based upon the breach of the covenant may arise when one party to the contract attempts to claim the benefit of a technical excuse for breaching the contract, or when he or she uses specific contractual terms in isolation in order to refuse to perform his or her contractual obligations, despite the general circumstances and understandings between the parties. When a court or trier of fact interprets a contract, there is always an "implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing" in every written agreement.

Contemporary usage in Europe   
The English private law has traditionally been averse to general clauses and has repeatedly rejected the adoption of good faith as a core concept of private law [ see Zimmermann, Reinhard; Whittaker, Simon (2000-06-08). Good Faith in European Contract Law. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521771900. ].........

On the European Continent, Good Faith often is strongly rooted in the legal framework. In the German speaking area, "Treu und Glauben"(Good faith) has a firm legal value, e.g. in Switzerland, where the Constitution's Art. 5[14] states that the state and private actors have to act in good faith. This leads to the assumption, e.g. in contracts, that all parties have signed in good faith and any missing or unclear aspect of a contract shall be interpreted based on the assumption of good faith of all parties.

Treu und Glauben ex Wiki 
Treu und Glauben bezeichnet das Sozialverhalten eines redlich und anständig handelnden Menschen, ohne den Begriff näher zu definieren.

Seinen historischen Ursprung hat der Grundsatz von Treu und Glauben in der bona fides im römischen Recht: Ein römischer Bürger hielt viel auf seine gute Treue; gemeint war damit zum Beispiel seine Zuverlässigkeit und Lauterkeit im Rechtsverkehr.

Auf den Grundsatz von Treu und Glauben wird bis heute häufig Bezug genommen. Ausgeprägt ist er in den Staaten unterschiedlich. Typisch ist ein Verweis wie etwa im deutschen Schuldrecht: Innerhalb eines Schuldverhältnisses ist der Schuldner nach § 242 BGB verpflichtet, die Leistung so zu bewirken, wie Treu und Glauben mit Rücksicht auf die Verkehrssitte es erfordern. In der Schweiz besitzt dieser Grundsatz sogar Verfassungsrang und ist dadurch von umfassenderer Wirkung.    
PS It has its origin in the bona fides of Roman Law. It sounds fair to me.


European Crooks Threaten Us   [ 17 September 2020 ]
Brussels has warned farmers, businesses and animal welfare campaigners that it may be forced to ban all British exports of live animals and animal products such as cheese, beef, eggs, chicken and lamb from January 1. 

European Commission officials told a meeting of trade associations and other stakeholders in Brussels on Friday that the ban was inevitable unless the UK gives details of its future animal health and food safety regime by the end of October.

UK farmers said it would devastate British agriculture while animal rights groups warned that livestock could suffer needlessly in long queues at borders. 

The EU ban on an animal products trade worth more than £3 billion in 2019 would also apply to Northern Ireland. Under the terms of the Withdrawal Agreement, Northern Ireland stays subject to EU animal health rules to prevent a hard Irish border after the Brexit transition period.

It would also jeopardise British horse racing by making the travel of racehorses to and from Ireland and France too difficult and force pet owners to send a blood sample to an EU approved lab three months before taking their cat, dog or ferret on holiday to the bloc.

On Sunday, David Frost, the UK’s chief negotiator accused the EU of threatening UK food exports to Northern Ireland during the ongoing trade talks, which Michel Barnier has denied

Unless the UK provides “full clarity” on the future rules and in particular its rules for imports, one EU official told the Telegraph, it would be impossible to add British animals and products to EU Sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) lists for non-EU countries.............

"Unless they hear something by the end of October, it seems no animals will be listed - including pets - to enter the 'EU SPS area'  which is the EU and Northern Ireland,” a source at the stakeholders meeting said. 
They are not turning nasty; they started out that way.  The Brexit Withdrawal Agreement, all 599 pages of it will have been written by fools and rogues. Naturally it will be open to malicious interpretation by the ill disposed. Ursula von der Leyen chose to claim that Pacta sunt servanda [ agreements must be kept ]. It is a brocard and a fundamental principle of law; she ignores it as a matter of course when she wants. John Major's sudden enthusiasm for it is just as unprincipled. A decent write up from The Telegraph is at The UK has to defend itself against predatory diplomacy, deal or no deal. It tells us inter alia that "The EU has systematically refused to comply with the judgments of the World Trade Organisation, flouting rulings on GMO crops, hormone beef, and Airbus subsidies, as if the matter were optional. It has repudiated the doctrine of legal supremacy and “direct effect”, the very doctrine that the EU now asserts in the Withdrawal Agreement."


French Fishermen Attack English Fishing Boats   [ 16 October 2020 ]
Fish wars have broken out in the English Channel as French trawlers confronted their British counterparts - firing flares and throwing frying pans. Two British boats - the Girl Macey, skippered by Scott Glover, and the Golden Promise, by Brian Whittington - fishing for scallops were involved in the skirmish.

The vessels, both based out of Brixham in Devon, were surrounded by around 20 French boats and were pelted with objects including frying pans and rocks.

The French crews even threw oil at the Gal Macey before firing a flare at the ship, with the violence sparking fears that there could be a death as hostilities worsen.

Ministers have put in place a 'five-fold increase in our enforcement capacity' over the last year in preparation for a possible 'Cod War' stand-off with European trawlermen.

Fishing remains one of the key sticking points to a Brexit deal, with Boris Johnson unwilling to allow EU trawlers to continue their existing access to UK waters forever.
It is time for the Royal Navy to start doing its job. Putting a few prize crews on these pirate boats would soon make a difference. It seems from the Mail's map that Johnson is letting them get away with the waters round Jersey, Guernsey etc.


Macron Gets Gobby About French Criminal Attacks On English Fishermen    [ 16 October 2020 ]
We sank the French Navy once. Is it time for an action replay?


Johnson Betraying British Fishermen  [ 11 November 2020 ]
LONDON (Reuters) - Britain said on Monday it was open to a “sensible” compromise on fishing and that there was goodwill on both sides to progress towards a Brexit trade deal, with the European Union saying it was redoubling its efforts for an accord.

The United Kingdom left the EU in January but the sides are trying to clinch a deal that would govern nearly 1 trillion dollars in annual trade before transitional arrangements end on Dec. 31...........

Back in Britain on Monday for another round of talks, EU chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier said: “Happy to be back in London today, redoubling our efforts to reach agreement on the future partnership.”.........

Fishing contributed just 0.03% of British economic output in 2019, but many Brexit supporters see it as a symbol of the regained sovereignty they say leaving the EU brings. Combined with fish and shellfish processing, the sector makes up 0.1% of Britain’s GDP.
Boris Johnson has betrayed any number of women; they have his bastards to prove it. He achieved a first in our political history by moving his mistress and their bastard into 10 Downing Street. He has not been able to stitch us up because Nigel Farage is out there, ready to take over from him. Of course Barnier is a malicious foreigner who wants agreement as long as it is total surrender by Her Majesty's Government. We dug the French our from under in two world wars. Are they grateful? Believe that if you want.


United Kingdom Local Elections 2021 [ 2020-11-28 ]
Will be held on Thursday 6 May 2021 - 2021-05-06. The reform Party ex Brexit Party is running. Do you want to be a candidate? Go to Candidate Applications now open for Local Elections, London, Police & Crime Commissioner, Scotland and Wales


Carole Cadwalladr Is A Lying Ratbag Who Libelled Brexit Wallah  [ 27 November 2020 ]
Late last night with the Banks v Cadwalladr hearing scheduled for 10:30 this morning, Carole Cadwalladr finally admitted what we all knew, there was no evidence to back up her claims that the Russians financed the Brexit campaign or that Arron Banks was involved in shady deals with the Russians. Why she left it to the eve of the hearing to admit it was all bollocks defies belief, cynics might note she still has two crowd funders running. One to fund this hopeless case and another to fund her “investigative journalism” – which produced the Russia nonsense.

Cadwalladr now has to pay £62,000 of costs on account this morning as a down payment, expect that figure to go higher. Cadwalladr has avoided the humiliation of appearing in court this morning by submitting in writing an amended defence which

“… removes the Truth Defence and the Limitation Defence”

Which is legalese for “it was all complete cock ‘n bull”

She has not stopped milking the crowd funding mugs yet, Carole has learnt there are plenty of gullible idiots who still want to believe her fairy tales. She intends to continue battling Banks by trying to mitigate her costs with the argument that, despite there being no truth to the allegations, she has being making around the world to much acclaim, they were made in the public interest. So she will run up her crowd funded legal bill to argue that her disinformation was in the public interest. Guido admires the novelty of that argument.

Cadwalladr has tried to portray this legal case as some kind of freedom of the press battle, it wasn’t. She has for years made unchallenged allegations, which were motivated out of political malice. Finally she has had to admit they were untrue. A lucrative, prize winning, journalistic hoax…
Cadwalladr is a lying ratbag who doesn't even know how to spell her own name but she'll take your money without a blush.


No Deal Brexit Looking Likelier  [ 29 November 2020 ]
A No Deal Brexit is more likely than the public expects, a Government source told The Mail on Sunday last night. 'A lot of people assume there is going to be a deal – but they need to realise we may not get there,' said the source.

Face-to-face negotiations resumed yesterday after EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier arrived in London, a week after one of his team tested positive for coronavirus.
It sounds good to me, to lotsa people. Barmier only wants surrender. The French want to steal our fish. It is time for the Royal Navy to earn its keep. They can do a bit of keelhauling and plank walking. It's in the blood.  May tried to betray us but even Parliament wouldn't swallow her treachery.  Boris Johnson wants to but he Nigel Farage will screw him if he tries it on again.


French Attack Brexit Negotiations   [ 5 December 2020 ]
Weary Brexit trade negotiators are still fighting to find a way through tonight amid claims the two sides are getting close. In an apparent positive sign, Michel Barnier is expected to stay on in London despite fears earlier that the talks might be on the brink of collapse after hitting new obstacles. The teams had sandwiches delivered earlier, and are expected to resume discussions this evening after a short break.

However, sources on both sides are cautioning that success is not guaranteed, amid warnings that the deadlock over fishing rights and level playing field rules must be ended this weekend..........  France engaged in some sabre-rattling this morning, publicly threatening to veto a 'bad'  deal. 

But Emmanuel Macron has to sell any pact to his domestic political audience, with fishing a particular concern. Observers believe the outline of a deal could already be in place and the sides are haggling over details..................

And Downing Street said the talks were at a 'very difficult point'. 'Time is in very short supply and we are at a very difficult point in the talks,' a spokesman said.
Macron doesn't want a deal; he wants unconditional surrender. Pretending that he wants "compromise" on fishing rights is blatantly abusive. This last minute nausea is another try on, a way to sneak through last minute details that spell disaster for England. It makes sense to shut the Tunnel and let them go to the Devil in their own way. The Mail is blaming our lot but then its owner has a chateau in France.


Boris Johnson Is Trying To Achieve A Fishing Compromise  [ 23 December 2020 ]
Brexit negotiators are making a 'final push' for a deal today as they close in on a compromise over fishing.

Government sources confirmed that Boris Johnson has established a 'hotline' to European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen as the two sides try to thrash out a deal before Christmas.

The pair are understood to have held regular secret phone calls in the last 48 hours.
Is Johnson a fool as well as a traitor? Offering not to keelhaul French fishermen or make them walk the plank might be "acceptable" in this decadent age but after that nothing. The Royal Navy has what it takes to lay on prize crews etc. Recall that Dartmoor Prison was built to hold French prisoners of war. It is still available. Be aware too that Johnson and Patel collude with Macron to import criminal Third World parasites and keep them in luxury.


Brexit Deal Might Be Good   [ 29 December 2020 ]
Brexit is good but the deal is different or is it? Recall that we were gotten into Europe by Ted Heath, a fat greedy Paedophile. See Treason At Maastricht for more and better details. Sean Gabb, England's leading libertarian teaches economics; has read the Withdrawal Agreement [ now expanded from 547 pages to 1,246 ]. He feels that it is tolerable or even good. It will not be a success for Johnson, more a failure of that woman von der Leyen.
I know that many of my friends have looked at the massive block of text that is the final agreement of our withdrawal from the European Union, and decided that we have been tricked again. My own preference would have been for a complete break, followed by unilateral free trade abroad and a libertarian revolution at home. However, I have taken the trouble to read the text—not, I accept, with the fullest attention: it is, after all, 1,246 pages long. There may be hidden traps that my reading has overlooked. Certainly, the reality of any agreement is less its wording than the approach the various sides take to implementing it. Even so, what my reading suggests is that this is somewhere between passingly acceptable and a diplomatic triumph.
Presumably the wretched thing is in English; who writes this rubbish? If they were French it was with malign intent.


Gove And Brussels Continue Attacking Brexit After It Is All 'Agreed'
HAPPILY for democratic governance of the UK, Lord Frost continues to fight off the multiple attacks of the EU aimed at bringing the UK into regulatory alignment, using the Northern Ireland Protocol as their lethal weapon. Caroline Bell’s forensic analysis puts it succinctly: 

‘Let’s not mince our words – the Northern Ireland Protocol is all about politics. It was cooked up by the EU in cahoots with a fervent Remainer May government and civil service to negate the result of the Brexit referendum. It had absolutely nothing to do with protecting the Good Friday Agreement nor with ensuring there was no hard border in Ireland.’
The New World Order is out there with its agenda and it flesh pots. Why do honest work when you can go to Brussels and get paid ten times as  much? Keeping snouts in the trough

is a good system of governance as long as the plebian masses don't get too envious. See more and better details at Euro MPs and Their Expenses. The Referendum was won on 24 June 2016  despite a blizzard of propaganda. It has been attacked by CameronMay. It passed into law and still they are sabotaging it.


Pakistani Says Plugging Gaps In The   [ 26 November 2022 ]
For many voters, frustrated by years of suppressed wages and despairing at the erosion of Britain's friendly, unified national character, the essential aim of Brexit was to tackle high immigration.

But that has not happened. In the six years since we voted to break free from the European Union, net inward migration has spiralled upwards. The latest figures, for the year to June, show an estimated 504,000 more people arriving for long-term residence in the UK than leaving.............

Politicians claim we need high levels of immigration to fuel economic growth. But we've had a steady increase throughout this century, pushing our population from about 59million in 2000 to 68million today – and we still have low growth. It's economically illiterate to argue that we need more migrants. What we desperately need instead is a long-term industrial strategy, with investment in the skills of the existing domestic workforce.

That means apprenticeships, training, bursaries, scholarships and other schemes to fill jobs with young British workers.

Because of the mess we are in and the absence of domestic skills, there are short-term labour shortages which have to be addressed by employing migrants. This is not sustainable [ but it is Ethnic Fouling - Editor ].
The fact that it takes Dr Ehsan, a Pakistani, writing in a sometimes Right Wing newspaper to tell the truth about Immigration from the Third World is a scandal. The Ethnic Fouling In England being inflicted on us was begun by Zionist crazies full of hate. And yes, the Tories are still sabotaging the Brexit we voted for; they hate Democracy. The Establishment is yet another ZOG [ Zionist Occupation Government ], just like America; it is the Enemy Within.


Trans-Pacific Trade Deal Signed  [ 2 April 2023 ]
The trans-Pacific trade club that the UK is joining is not a substitute for membership of the European Union. But, for a number of reasons, it is much more important than it seems.

Most obvious of those is that the world outside Europe, and particularly the countries round the Pacific Rim, will grow much faster than continental Europe. On a long view, it is a no-brainer to try to build relationships with fast-growing markets rather than slow-growing ones.

The name of the club, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, does not exactly roll off the tongue, and the UK is rather a long way from the Pacific.

There are 11 members and we do lots of trade already with many of them, including Japan, Australia and Canada, so don't expect any sudden boost to UK exports.
Thrilling news? Perhaps not but important just the same. Trade is why China is on the up. America is going down because it is run by Zionist crazies. This is all about Geopolitics.