War Trials

The Nuremberg War Trials are the most famous and, one hopes did not set the tone for subsequent trials. Perhaps they were less corrupt than Stalin's show trials but not much. They were designed to give an appearance of justice being done to top Nazis. It was pay back time. Using laws made up for the occasion helps give that impression. Bad law was  badly administered but then they were set up by Mickey Marcus, a Jew. It is certain that Rudolf Höß, the commandant of Auschwitz testified having been tortured first by  Sergeant Clarke and other  Jews in the British Army [ see under ]. He was just one victim.

The Russian judge had to leave the court when the Germans were being tried for invading Poland because the Russians were co-conspirators. All of the judges knew about this malpractice. The name for this is Perverting the course of justice. It is also Malfeasance in public office and a high class lynching party. The trials gave rise to the Nuremberg Principles.

A good, book length analysis of the Nuremberg War Trials with forewords by two very eminent men is Advance To Barbarism by F.J.P. Veale, a right wing activist who was not amused by the whole thing.

There were also #Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal and the #Khabarovsk war crimes trials

Tyranny At Nuremberg
An important article by Paul Craig Roberts, a distinguished economist. He tells us that the law is being perverted by corrupt politicians driven by hate. The law is there to protect all; it is not a weapon to be abused. Further that Robert Jackson, as United States Attorney General said that the right to remain silent is there to protect the innocent. He addresses the same theme with The Western World Is Now A Tyranny

The European Journal Of International Law takes a position on Imperfect Justice at Nuremberg and Tokyo. It manages not to notice torture and other blatant perversions.


Not Guilty at Nuremberg - The German Defence Case
is a pamphlet by Carlos Porter, which investigates the history of the Nuremberg show trials. The primarily purpose of the pamphlet is to give the reader a general overview of the German politicians or military men, who were "tried" by the Bolshevo-plutocratic Allied victors and the defence case they put forward in the controversial drama, which has been described by some [ e.g. the Lord Chief Justice of America - Editor ] as a lynching  To a lesser extent it also looks into the trials surrounding Imperial Japan and the defence put forward by them.
Mr Porter tells us that malpractice was extensive, that all or a large most of the documents produced as evidence were forgeries, that the whole thing was a perversion of the course of justice. The US Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone called the Nuremberg trials a high class lynching party. Was he wrong? He confirms Mr Porter's view.


Julius Streicher
Was a deeply sincere Nazi who was tortured by blacks and Jews at Nurnberg. He was hanged for exercising his right to Free Speech.


American War Crimes
There were major, systematic, deliberate crimes in Germany after the war. These were being committed as the Nuremberg trials were in full swing. One was the deliberate murder of a million Wehrmacht PoWs by Eisenhower, the Supreme Allied Commander. See Other Losses for more and better details.


Malmedy Massacre Trial ex Wiki
The Malmedy massacre trial (U.S. vs. Valentin Bersin, et al.) was held in May-July 1946 in the Dachau concentration camp to try the German Waffen-SS soldiers accused of the Malmedy massacre of December 17, 1944. The highest-ranking defendant was the former SS general, Sepp Dietrich. It attracted great attention because of the nature of the crime and the later disputes about the conduct of the trial.
This was victor's justice and bad justice to boot. Torture, starvation, mock trials etc. were used to pervert the course of justice. It was much like the Nuremberg trials. See The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century for a good account.


Nuremberg Trials ex Wiki
US Supreme Court Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone called the Nuremberg trials a fraud. "[Chief US prosecutor] Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg," he wrote. "I don't mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretence that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas."

Associate Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas charged that the Allies were guilty of "substituting power for principle" at Nuremberg. "I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled," he wrote. "Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamour of the time."
Stone was to the point and being a very senior judge he knew what he was talking about.

Nuremberg Trials ex Wiki
The validity of the court has been questioned for a variety of reasons:-
The main Soviet judge, Nikitchenko, had taken part in Stalin's show trials of 1936-1938,

One of the charges, brought against Keitel, Jodl, and Ribbentrop included conspiracy to commit aggression against Poland in 1939. The Secret Protocols of the German-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of August 23, 1939, proposed the partition of Poland between the Germans and the Soviets (which was subsequently executed in September 1939); however, Soviet leaders were not tried for being part of the same conspiracy. Instead, the Tribunal falsely proclaimed the Secret Protocols of the Non-Aggression Pact to be a forgery.

The court agreed to relieve the Soviet leadership from attending these trials as war criminals in order to hide their crimes against war civilians, crimes that were committed by their army that included "carving up Poland in 1939 and attacking Finland three months later." This "exclusion request" was initiated by the Russians and subsequently approved by the court's administration.

The Charter of the International Military Tribunal permitted the use of normally inadmissible "evidence."
Article 19 specified that "The Tribunal shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence... and shall admit any evidence which it deems to have probative value". Article 21 of the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal (IMT) Charter stipulated:
"The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof. It shall also take judicial notice of official governmental documents and reports of the United [Allied] Nations, including acts and documents of the committees set up in the various allied countries for the investigation of war crimes, and the records and findings of military and other Tribunals of any of the United [Allied] Nations"
The chief Soviet prosecutor submitted false documentation in an attempt to indict defendants for the murder of thousands of Polish officers in the Katyn forest near Smolensk. However, the other Allied prosecutors refused to support the indictment and German lawyers promised to mount an embarrassing defence. No one was charged nor found guilty at Nuremberg for the Katyn Forest Massacre. In 1990, the Soviet government acknowledged that the Katyn massacre was carried out, not by the Germans, but by the Soviet secret police.
Article 21 has a meaning in plain English: We are going to claim whatever we want as the truth. They gave themselves a free hand to lie and pervert the course of justice.


Sergeant Clarke, Jew, Thug And Torturer
Clarke was a field police man after the war, searching for Nazis. He ran a party of men who captured Rudolf Höß, one time commandant of Auschwitz. They  found him on a farm near Heide in Schleswig Holstein. Clarke and the other Jews beat him and would have murdered him if they had not been dragged off. Then:-
It took three days to get a coherent statement out of him. But once he started talking there was no holding him.
Three days of torture presumably although the book does not quite say so. Höß signed a statement which was written in English, a language he did not understand. He gave evidence at Nuremberg as a result of torture and was subsequently hanged by the Poles. The Jew, Clarke however walks the streets of England, a successful business men and doubtless boasts over a pint about how he got away with GBH and various other crimes when he was subject to the King's Regulations, the Army Act and English law in general.
See page 232 et seq. Legions of Death by Rupert Butler.


Jews Captured Auschwitz Commandant [ 1 September 2013, the anniversary of the 1939 - 1945 War ]
Second World War began when the Wehrmacht invaded Poland. See also Polish September Campaign. It was soon followed by the Soviet Invasion of Poland
Was my Jewish great-uncle a Nazi hunter?
Could a German Jew really have been a war crimes investigator for the British, responsible for tracking down Rudolf Höß, the commandant of Auschwitz?............

I was researching a story about my great-uncle, Hanns Alexander, a German Jew who had fled Berlin for London in the 1930s and who, I heard, was responsible for tracking down and capturing Höss. I was attempting to discover if the story was true..........

At first, the camp was designed to hold political prisoners, but later, following Heinrich Himmler's instructions that he must carry out the "final solution of the Jewish question", Höss turned the camp into a killing machine. With gas chambers masked as showers, and enormous crematoria built to burn the bodies, Höss supervised the murder of more than a million men, women and children.
Another criminal comes to light - post mortem just like Jimmy Savile. The Guardian is marketing a propaganda book, which naturally makes no mention of the fact that the Jews who captured Rudolf Höß, then tortured him at length. Their first effort was to beat him almost to death. They forced him to sign a confession, written in English, a language he did not know. It told lies about killing Jews at Auschwitz. Read about the floggings on page 232 et seq. in Legions of Death by Rupert Butler.


Nuremberg And Jews
“You know how I have despised anti-Semitism. You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge — you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about seventy-five percent Jewish. Now my point is that the Jews should stay away from this trial — for their own sake. For — mark this well — the charge ‘a war for the Jews’ is still being made and in the post-war years it will be made again and again. The too large percentage of Jewish men and women here will be cited as proof of this charge. Sometimes it seems that the Jews will never learn about these things. They seem intent on bringing new difficulties down on their own heads. I do not like to write about this matter —it is distasteful to me — but I am disturbed about it. They are pushing and crowding and competing with each other and with everyone else.”

Chris Dodd tells me that when he reads this letter, “I first of all cringe a little bit because I wonder what he’s driving at.”

As provocative as the passages may seem, he suggests it’s also important to note that his father specifically said he deplored anti-Semitism and, in fact, had close Jewish friends. So, the senator says, “I tried to understand it in the context, knowing who he was, knowing what he cared about, what his own history was. And there were those, the [Charles] Lindberghs and others, that made the case that…  Roosevelt got us into this war because of Jewish issues.”
This quotation is from Thomas Dodd who was in the American Senate and at Nuremberg presumably in a legal capacity. He came unstuck later for fraud but not for being a drunkard.


Jews And Torture
Discrediting Torture is Jewish Self-Hate....

Think before you speak! Jews are the world's greatest advocates and practitioners of torture. If one discredits torture, one discredits traditional Jewish methodology. . .......

. . . one discredits The Holocaust™!

"Louis Marschalko, Special Correspondent; Playwright and Poet affirmed: "Out of 3,000 people employed on the staff at the Nuremberg Courts, 2,400 were Jews." . . .

"What methods were employed to extract confessions presented at a number of the war crimes trials of 1945 and later?

Torture, ranging from forcing the accused persons to eat faeces to destroying their reproductive organs in a most painful manner. All sorts of psychological tricks and duress were also employed. Some years before his death U.S. Senator Joseph R. McCarthy (1908-1957) gave the following statement to the press with regard to the war crimes trials: "I have heard evidence and read documentary proofs to the effect that the accused persons were beaten up, maltreated and physically tortured by methods which could only be conceived by sick brains. They subjected to mock trial and pretended executions, they were told their families would be deprived of their ration cards. All these things were carried out with the approval of the Public Prosecutor in order to secure the psychological atmosphere necessary for the extortion of the required confessions. "

Instead they should have handled it as if it needed no refutation. Jews have never once been guilty of crimes against the goyim. This is self-evident. Anti-Semitism exists outside the world of cause and effect. It is a disease that exists as spores in the soil. Once it infects a goy, you must beat it out of him. That is the only humane thing to do. The "light onto the world" is actually a blowtorch to the genitals.
A Jew writes about torture. He knows where the dirt is. Normal Jewish practice is to do evil and hide it. But some of them are honest.


Nuremberg and Other War Crimes Trials - Historical Fact No. 2
Richard Harwood makes a compelling case that the ingredients that made up the Nuremberg Trials were: the pretence of justice, restrictions on the defence, the presumption of guilt before the trial had even started, and hysterical accusations of the prosecution without any foundation of evidence.

In the indictment, there were very few crimes listed that the Allies themselves were not guilty of, and even fewer that the Germans were in fact guilty of.

This book contains, not a re-writing of history, but rather a simple guide to historical material which has been forgotten, or discounted. The 312,022 notarized defence affidavits presented at the trial have been forgotten, or discounted, while the 8 or 9 prosecution affidavits which "rebutted" them are remembered and canonized.

This book references a great many number of sources. That is so that interested but sceptical people may check things out for themselves.

Whether the statements of the defence are more credible than the charges of human soap, steamings, lampshades, gassings, and other wild accusations of the prosecution, is for the reader to decide.
The truth in politics is anything that cannot be proved to be a lie. There is no mention here  of torture. This does not mean that it was not part of the fun. Also Nuremberg and Other War Crimes by the same author. 


The Final Solution - The Attempt to Exterminate the Jews of Europe, 1939-1945
Seems to follow the official line on the Holocaust story.


The Nuremberg Trials from the American PBS
Dodd (archival): "This exhibit which is on the table is a human head with its skull bone removed, shrunken, stuffed and preserved. The Nazis had one of their many victims decapitated after having him hanged apparently for fraternizing with a German woman."

Narrator: The shrunken head had been used as a paperweight by the commandant of Buchenwald concentration camp. The courtroom was aghast.
This is a transcript from a PBS film. The shrunken head story seems to have been dropped.


On March 7, 1946, charges of participating in a "common design" to violate the Laws and Usages of War under the 1929 Geneva Convention and the Hague Convention of 1907 were brought against a group of 61 men, associated with the infamous Mauthausen concentration camp near Linz, Austria. The charges, which did not include "Crimes Against Humanity," were related to the fact that the prisoners included Soviet Prisoners of War, captured civilian resistance fighters, and Allied nationals including a few Commandos and spies.


http://www.vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres3/HoaxV2.pdf = the hoax of the century /data/holocaust pp 1-42  Roosevelt designated Judge Samuel Rosenman


The Nuremberg Trials 60th Anniversary  "In late 1944 Lt. Colonel Murray C. Bernays, a naturalized American Jew of Lithuanian origin, and a graduate of Harvard Law School, who was heading head up ..."
www.adl.org/education/dimensions_19/section1/background.asp    ibid 43

The filling of the War Crimes Branch position with a fanatical Zionist, the

Marcus �first soldier since Biblical times to hold the rank of General in the Army  p 55

Canaris betrayed Germany at every opportunity. p 57

It is convenient to state at this point, in very general terms, what was going

on with respect to the Jews of Europe during the life of the Nazi regime. Before

the war, the German Government had used all means to encourage the

emigration of Jews from Germany, and most German Jews had left Germany

before the outbreak of the war. p 59 

Anne Frank is said to have perished. Because there were many Dutch Jews at Belsen this could easily be true but it is difficult, to say the least, to guess the cause of death in such a case. There were no exterminations and the Jewish families were isolated from the typhus epidemic. The question of the authenticity of the diary is not considered important enough to examine here; I will only remark that I have looked it over and don't believe it. For example, as early as page 2 one is reading an essay on why a 13-year-old girl would start a diary, and then page 3 gives a short history of the Frank family and then quickly reviews the specific anti-Jewish measures that followed the German occupation in 1940. The rest of the book is in the same historical spirit. The remainder of the Belsen concentration camp p 66.


Nuremberg War Trial Interpreter Puts The Boot In 23 October 2014 ]
Siegfried Ramler travelled from Honolulu to London last month, a little short of his 90th birthday, to give a talk about human dignity and the Nuremberg trials, at which he worked as an interpreter. Coincidentally, he arrived as the Conservative party announced an ill-considered and petulant threat to withdraw from the European Convention of Human Rights, aligning itself with the ideas of Vladimir Putin. The convention was adopted shortly after Ramler completed his Nuremburg assignment, reflecting the "enthronement of human rights" that Winston Churchill had called for in October 1942.........

He feels strongly about global cooperation � he still works at the East-West Centre in Hawaii (an organisation founded in 1960 to strengthen relations between nations) � and human rights and international criminal justice [ but not for Arabs in Israel - Editor ].........

It seems that some Conservatives � the justice secretary among them � wish to be rid of the European court. Chris Grayling would do well to spend an evening with Siegfried Ramler, who could refresh him on the rationale for the European Convention and its court, a system of collective security. Sig knows a thing or two about history, and what happens when checks and balances are cast aside.
The Guardian is marketing a book by a Jew, Siegfried Ramler. That is where the dishonesty starts. Ramler doesn't like Nazis & vice versa. Ramler tells us about the non-existent gas chambers in Belsen concentration camp but obviously has nothing to say about Concentration Camps In Israel at KL Saharonim, KL Ketziot or Holot [ There are others - Ed. ] The Grauniad abuses the Tories but keeps quiet about other evils.
PS Recall what the Lord Chief Justice of America said about the Nuremberg Trials - - [ US prosecutor ] Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg. But then the whole thing was set up by a Jew.


Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal
The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE), also known as the Tokyo Trial and the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal, was a military trial convened on 29 April 1946 to try leaders of the Empire of Japan for their crimes against peace, conventional war crimes, and crimes against humanity, leading up to and during the Second World War.[1] The IMTFE was modeled after the International Military Tribunal (IMT) at Nuremberg, Germany, which prosecuted the leaders of Nazi Germany for their war crimes, crimes against peace, and crimes against humanity.[2]

Following Japan's defeat and occupation by the Allies, the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers, United States General Douglas MacArthur, issued a special proclamation establishing the IMTFE. A charter was drafted to establish the court's composition, jurisdiction, and procedures; the crimes were defined based on the Nuremberg Charter. The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal was composed of judges, prosecutors, and staff from eleven countries that had fought against Japan: Australia, Canada, China, France, India, the Netherlands, New Zealand, the Philippines, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States; the defense consisted of Japanese and American lawyers. The Tokyo Trial exercised broader temporal jurisdiction than its counterpart in Nuremberg, beginning from the 1931 Japanese invasion of Manchuria. Twenty-eight high-ranking Japanese military and political leaders were tried by the court, including current and former prime ministers, cabinet members, and military commanders. They were charged with fifty-five separate counts, including the waging wars of aggression, murder, and various war crimes and crimes against humanity (such as torture and forced labor) against prisoners-of-war, civilian internees, and the inhabitants of occupied territories; ultimately, 45 of the counts, including all the murder charges, were ruled either redundant or not authorized under the IMTFE Charter. The Tokyo Trial lasted more than twice as long as the better-known Nuremberg trials, and its impact was similarly influential in the development of international law; similar international war crimes tribunals would not be established until the 1990s.[3]

By the time it adjourned on November 12, 1948, two defendants had died of natural causes and one, Shūmei Ōkawa, was ruled unfit to stand trial. All remaining defendants were found guilty of at least one count, of whom seven were sentenced to death and sixteen to life imprisonment.



Khabarovsk war crimes trials  
The Khabarovsk war crimes trials were the Soviet hearings of twelve Japanese Kwantung Army officers and medical staff charged with the manufacture and use of biological weapons, and human experimentation, during World War II. The war crimes trials were held between 25 and 31 December 1949 in the Soviet industrial city of Khabarovsk (Хабаровск), the largest in the Russian Far East.

All twelve defendants pleaded guilty and were sentenced to prison terms ranging from two to twenty-five years, to be served in Siberian labour camps. Those captured by the United States were secretly given immunity in exchange for the data gathered during their human experiments.[1] The United States covered up the human experimentations and handed stipends to the perpetrators.[2] The Americans co-opted the researchers' bioweapons information and experience for use in their own biological warfare program, much like what had been done with Nazi German researchers in Operation Paperclip.[3][4] In 1956, those still serving their sentences were released and repatriated to Japan.  


Errors & omissions, broken links, cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find any I am open to comment.

Email me at Mike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP KeyHome Page