Antonio Gramsci

Antonio Gramsci [ 1891 - 1937 ] was an Italian revolutionary, subversive, chief theoretician and Secretary of the Communist Party of Italy, who worked out that the "inevitable" revolution of the proletariat predicted by orthodox Marxism had not occurred by the early 20th century. His answer was to subvert the Christian culture of Europe which promotes civilized values. This means infiltrating society from the top down. Marx advocated doing it from the bottom up.  'Workers of the world unite. You have nothing to lose but your chains' - It sounded good but didn't quite work. Taking over the Education industry especially the universities is a major part of the attack. Infiltrating and discrediting Holy Mother Church was more important in Italy than elsewhere. It was his  Long March Through The Institutions.

Antonio was born in 1891, the year that Pope Leo XIII published Rerum Novarum, his great encyclical  on Capital and Labour. Leo told us that Capital should treat the working man decently, while Socialism, a reaction to Capitalism was worse. Gramsci knew all of this and decided that the Church was an enemy but he did not have what it took to tell the world why. His Prison Notebooks are extensive but have little or nothing to say about Rerum Novarum. Google gave a mere 82 hits for
"prison notebooks" "Rerum Novarum"
His silence is an admission of evil.

The Enemy of Western Civilization
It seems out that he had an unhappy childhood because his family was poor while his father was in prison, that he was a hunchback due to an accident. Did these things make him sour tempered? Quite possibly. Were they an excuse for the evil he did? No! See what the Wikipedia has to say about him. But Read critically. Is it telling the truth or is it biased? A better source is the Metapedia - see Antonio Gramsci. Another enemy was the Frankfurt School. They were Jews in the main, giving the intellectual influence to drive the hate.

The crucial aspect to taking over is owning or at least controlling the Main Steam Media, Christianity in particular the Catholic Church, & the education industry. Look at who has Media Power and Media Control. The destruction of civilization  can then be achieved by inciting Homosexuality, Feminism, Illegal Immigration, pandering to Third World infiltrators, encouraging people to take on huge debts through mortgages so that they can be broken by rising interest rates etc. Look at the BBC's output and you will understand their agenda. Commercial television is also designed to pervert. It is Cultural Marxism, it is Cultural Genocide. Here are sources. Read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself.
Examples of his effectiveness are at the Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Oxford & Protocols Of The Learned Elders of Cambridge. The presumably intelligent have fallen for his nonsense; it is Mob Psychology in action.  Someone else, writing at On cultural Marxism the ghost of Antonio Gramsci regards him as an enemy alien.

Antonio's Writing
His writing is lucid, in translation at all events.


A Nation of Frogs
Tells us about Antonio and how he fitted into the world hating conspiracy that is Marxism.


Long March Through The Institutions
Infiltrating the Church, law, government universities and everything else that makes a country work is the key step in destroying it. Marxists have done it and destruction proceeds apace. Doctor Yates knows the problem. Understanding the enemy is a major step in the right direction. It starts with Entryism and ends with perversion and Cultural Genocide.


Innocents Clubs
Are clubs for the well meaning, who are eager to believe the best of anyone who can be depicted as a victim of British Imperialism or something else they don't like. The Church of England is a de facto enemy, full of good will to all men unless, perhaps they are English. The innocents, the gullible are very keen on promoting the idea of racism, the idea that we oppress foreigners. But there is no level playing field in this concept. Blacks are allowed to hate us. Blacks must be pandered to. Innocents Club is the term coined by Willi Münzenberg, the master propagandist who was talent spotted by  Lenin in Switzerland.


Invisible Dictatorship
An invisible dictatorship was a term coined by Mikhail Bakunin to describe his concept of clandestine revolutionary leadership. Bakunin also used the term invisible legion and invisible network to describe his invisible dictatorship.........
Modern uses of the term
The term has also been used more recently, for instance by the Independent Voters Alliance United States of America to describe the two party system currently existing in the USA which they claim makes voting useless as the "choices in every election are limited to candidates financed by the same money sources." Such viewpoints have become more widespread in the USA particularly since the heightened security after 9/11.
An anarchist explains. It is like our Invisible Enemy, a fair description of Her Majesty's Government with its commitment to change and the destruction of England. A lot of other governments in the West have been taken over in the same way. America is just the most obvious victim. We are ruled by Zionist Occupation Governments, ZOG for short.


Entryism is a political tactic by which an organisation encourages members to infiltrate another organisation in an attempt to gain recruits, or take over entirely. In situations where the organisation being "entered" is hostile to entryism, the entryists may engage in a degree of subterfuge to hide the fact that they are, in fact, an organisation in their own right........ Other entryist groups have gone to the extent of hiding both their political views and their organisational existence......... Entryism is often (but not always) done secretly and often in organisations run on democratic centralist lines. Entryism is seen by some as a logical conclusion from Leninist political theory which postulates that a "revolutionary vanguard" can successfully foment a revolution within a larger capitalist society, but according to some, the strategy of entryism is as old as politics itself.
It means infiltration. His Majesty's Government, just like His Majesty's Allegedly Most Loyal Opposition. So is England.  One of the guilty is Miliband, a Jew, son of a communist subversive and grandson of a murderous traitor. He was now in the Cabinet and was mentioned by the BBC as a possible prime minister. Notice the sneer; he is an arrogant rogue.


Deep Entryism
Deep entryism/entryism
In these types of entryism, entryists engage in a long-term perspective in which they work within an organisation for decades in hopes of gaining influence and a degree of power and perhaps even control of the larger organisation. In 'entryism sui generis' (of a special type), Trotskyists, for example, do not openly argue for the building of a Trotskyist party. 'Deep entryism' refers to the long duration..........
The idea is entirely straightforward; infiltrating for the long term. In Espionage they are called sleepers and are activated by their handlers when wanted. The Wiki does not bother to point out that there has been a broad front penetration of civilization using this approach. The BBC is totally dominated by them. Invisible Enemy, a book by Edward Abboud tells us about it and names the guilty.


Gramsci's Legacy Of Hate And Conflict
Ideas are more dangerous than weapons because they control men's minds and actions. Here are some spread by the Education industry and the Main Steam Media. There is no truth, only competing agendas. All Western (and especially American) claims to moral superiority over Communism/Fascism/Islam are vitiated by the West’s history of racism and colonialism:-
1. There are no objective standards by which we may judge one culture to be better than another. Anyone who claims that there are such standards is an evil oppressor.
2. The prosperity of the West is built on ruthless exploitation of the Third World; therefore Westerners actually deserve to be impoverished and miserable.
3. Crime is the fault of society, not the individual criminal. Poor criminals are entitled to what they take. Submitting to criminal predation is more virtuous than resisting it.
4. The poor are victims. Criminals are victims. And only victims are virtuous. Therefore only the poor and criminals are virtuous. (Rich people can borrow some virtue by identifying with poor people and criminals.)
5. For a virtuous person, violence and war are never justified. It is always better to be a victim than to fight, or even to defend oneself. But ‘oppressed’ people are allowed to use violence anyway; they are merely reflecting the evil of their oppressors.
6. When confronted with terror, the only moral course for a Westerner is to apologize for past sins, understand the terrorist’s point of view, and make concessions.
These ideas have been released into the wild but have a virtue. When they are stated clearly and looked in the eye they are quite clearly false or misguided but they do have an attraction for a certain type of mind.


Gramsci's Grand Plan
Father Thornton explains how Gramsci decided to destroy civilization. The Church was very good on analysis. Their follow through has not been effective.
Gramsci believed that if Communism achieved "mastery of human consciousness," then labour camps and mass murder would be unnecessary. How does an ideology gain such mastery over patterns of thought inculcated by cultures for hundreds of years? Mastery over the consciousness of the great mass of people would be attained, Gramsci contended, if Communists or their sympathizers gained control of the organs of culture--churches, educationnewspapers, magazines, the electronic media, serious literature, music, the visual arts, and so on. By winning "cultural hegemony" to use Gramsci's own term, Communism would control the deepest wellsprings of human thought and imagination. One need not even control all of the information itself if one can gain control over the minds that assimilate that information. Under such conditions, serious opposition disappears since men are no longer capable of grasping the arguments of Marxism's opponents. Men will indeed "love their servitude," and will not even realize that it is servitude.

However, the hard core of the Communist movement consisted of ruthless criminals, clear-eyed in their understanding of the intellectual errors of Marxism, who were willing to employ any necessary means to obtain the power they sought. For such hardened, hate-intoxicated conspirators, ideology is a tactic, a means of mobilizing supporters and rationalizing criminal actions.

Those who accept uncritically the idea that "Communism is dead" fail to understand the true nature of the enemy. Communism is not an ideology in which one believes. Rather, it is a criminal conspiracy in which one enlists. Although Lenin professed to revere Marx's scribblings as sacred writ, once his Bolsheviks had seized power in Russia, Lenin freely modified Marxism to suit his needs. The same was true of Stalin. The Bolsheviks did not come to power in Russia by any uprising of the workers and peasants, but by a coup d'état, orchestrated by a tightly disciplined Marxist cadre and ultimately consolidated by civil war. They also received "lest it be forgotten" critical help from Western political and banking elites. [ See Wall Street Helps Bolsheviks - Editor ]

In similar fashion, Communism did not come to power in Eastern Europe by revolution, but rather through the imposition of that system by a conquering Red Army and, once again, through the corrupt connivance of conspirators in the West. In China, Communism came to power through civil war, aided by the Soviets and by traitorous elements in the West.
That seems clear enough as a description of what is being done to us. The BBC, the object of my particular loathing is in the forefront of telling us that Englishmen are inferior to blacks and that we owe it to them to let them get away with murder, rape, et cetera.


Gramsci Versus Tocqueville
Alexis de Tocqueville was a French traveller who admired the America of the Nineteenth Century for its freedom, something which makes him very different from Gramsci.


Marxist Takeover Of The Ruling Classes
Doctor Gabb has been over the ground and puts his view.


Salami Tactics
Are a similar approach used by communists in Hungary.


Here are a few of the enemy, the vicious rather than the Useful Idiots they control.


Transmission Belts
Are the propaganda conduits that Lenin used. Trade unions were going to tell the workers what to think. Nowadays it the Main Steam Media and the Education industry which do the same job; very effective they are too. Then the Internet came along to bypass them and tell the truth. Thank God for it but do not believe everything you read on it. Perhaps THE go to source is the site run by Ron Unz at His writers are free men all. None are beholden to MSM proprietors for a living


Useful Idiots
These are Antonio's chosen tools and deadly effective, driven as  they are by a certainty of their moral superiority. They have swallowed the idea of Western Guilt, the view that the white man is evil and lesser races are his victims.


Who is Antonio Gramsci?
Alberto Luzárraga says; You had better learn. Mr. Luzárraga tells us about the difference between Antonio and Alexis de Tocqueville; between slavery and liberty, between mass murder and prosperity. Mr Luzárraga is very much on the right lines.



Errors & omissions, broken links, cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find any I am open to comment.

Email me at Mike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP key.  Home

Updated  on