Modern history began in England with the Industrial Revolution, which gave us steam power to replace muscles and hard work. This led on to railways and factories.  Entrepreneurs drove trade bringing prosperity for some, even most. But there were losers. One response was Socialism, which became Communism. The Wikipedia takes a position in Communism ex Wiki. Its propaganda turned bosses into Capitalist Swine while factories became dark Satanic mills.

In 1891 Pope Leo published his great work, Rerum Novarum, a response to the oppression of the working man, saying in essence that Capitalism is bad and Socialism is worse. An early form was the Communist League  which was joined by Marx and Engels.

The movement was largely driven by Jews, malicious Jews to be sure but Jews none the less. In Russia under the Tsars they were largely confined to the Pale of Settlement. There they specialized in defrauding peasants, grinding them down into poverty. The Tsars gave their people the May Regulations to protect them against Jews extorting their money and their life blood. Then Jews turned nasty, assassinating the Tsar, then bringing us the Bolshevik Revolution with its millions of murders.

They exported it worldwide. In fact they took over various countries. See Hungarian Soviet Republic, Bavarian Soviet Republic 1918 -1919

We are told that Communism is a Left Wing movement while the Nazis are, like the Fascists  Right Wingers. The reality is that they are the same for the ordinary man, authoritarian, murderous oppressors, in a word Tyrants or, in another Socialists They all collectivists although each lot  different uniforms and slogans. One significant divergence is that the Nazis were Nationalists while the Communists are international. The Jews are also international; alleging that Palestine was a land with no people for a people with no land. Jews are heavily involved in Communism but they work to conceal the truth.

File:Lenin, Engels, Marx.png
Lenin [ died of syphilis ], Engels [ Capitalist Swine, rode to hounds ], Marx [ Jew, disciple of Hegel, just like naughty little Adolf ]

Communism Explained
The main difference between Marxist and libertarian theories of class is in where each side locates the source of class power. For the Marxists, class power derives from ownership of the means of production. Standing in the tradition of Rousseau, Marx and his followers believe that mankind lived at first in a state of primitive communism, in which the means of production were held in common. This ended with the rise of a class that was able to take the means of production into its own possession. This class then set up the State as an executive committee to assist in its domination of everyone else. Since then, there have been successive revolutions as changes in the means of production have raised other classes to wealth, and these classes have then consolidated their own leading position by taking over the State.

According to this theory, therefore, the source of class power lies in wealth, and political power follows from wealth. This explains the Marxist belief that a communist revolution, by abolishing class domination, will rid the State of its oppressive nature. The State may then be dispensed from the liberal requirements of limitation and due process, and can be safely used as an instrument for ending such class power as remained. It will then, of itself, wither away.
This comes from Sean Gabb, who is England's leading libertarian.


Moscow Gold
It was worth many millions when a million was seriously useful.


Communists who hide their loyalties in order to betray are enemies. Others did it because communists were persona non grata; they got themselves hated. Mass murder can have that effect.


Dictatorship Of The Proletariat
The workers were going to run things for the benefit of everybody? Sounds plausible until you start thinking about it. It didn't happen of course but it fooled people. That was the point.


Bavarian Soviet Republic
It did not last very long but it did exist. There was even a Bavarian Revolution.


Were fun people to know NOT.


Communism Was Never A People's Revolution


Communist Infiltration
On this occasion Melanie Phillips, a Jew throws aside the veil and reveals some of the truth but not all. She can be very good on the damage that the flood of Immigrants that is washing over England but she keeps her mouth firmly shut about the perpetrators, to wit her very own people, the Jews and the damage they are doing. Ditto for the fact that it is deliberate Subversion..... A simultaneous article in The Spectator tells us about Labour Party contacts with the USSR and their treasonous inclinations. See Labour And Treason........ It is all part of the Marxist Takeover Of The Ruling Classes and Her Majesty's Government Solid confirmation comes from Reaching Through The Iron Curtain
Rather a good one.


The Communist Manifesto
Is their 1848 advertising prospectus. It tells us:-
In short, the Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things.
The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communistic revolution. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.
You can't say that Karl was beating about the bush but you can say that the BBC eagerly ignores the truth.


Communism Was Jewish
Do the main stream media tell you this? No. This implies that they are suppressing the truth and they are part of the problem too.


Communism The Specter and the Struggle
A good summary  of the USSR as a problem with problems written for public consumption in TIME, an American magazine in 1982.


Communist Jargon
Some of it makes sense. Some shows muddled thinking. It obscures the truth rather than vice versa.


Here are some of the perpetrators.


Third International
Were fun people to know NOT.


Pope Leo XIII, the head of Holy Mother Church took a position on the welfare of the working man with Rerum Novarum in 1891.  Quadragesimo Anno came 40 years later. They still read well.

I have included pieces on  Bella Dodd and Manning Johnson, two communists who repented then talked. The Wikipedia has a very brief piece on one but nothing on the other. It is part of the controlled media, one to Read sceptically. In fine; it is part of the problem not the solution. But read for yourself. Think for yourself. Decide for yourself.

The Church - Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution?
Although not a religious person myself, I am usually in favor of a revitalization of Christianity in Europe . However, I sometimes have my doubts when I see how many, too many, church leaders consistently end up on the wrong side of issues related to ...
Fjordman is right and Holy Mother Church is wrong. Snivelling to religious fanatics is a short path to Hell. It is not frivolous to wonder if the Pope really is a Catholic or a Jewish infiltrator.
Manning Johnson on Subverting Holy Mother Church
Bella Dodd


Did Communists Infiltrate the Catholic Church?
As a traditional Jew, I'm deeply concerned over the plight of the Roman Catholic Church, which I consider to be the largest and most influential repository of conservative Judeo-Christian values in America today.

Much has been written regarding Communist methods of infiltration.....  Examples in America include substantial inroads by Communists into organized labor, academia, the legal profession, race relations, cultural institutions, and the government itself.

Two former Communists, Bella Dodd and Manning Johnson, spoke on Communist infiltration of the Catholic Church. Dodd, an important Communist party lawyer, teacher and activist, converted to Catholicism in April 1952 under the tutelage of Bishop Fulton J. Sheen. Stating that the Communist infiltration was so extensive that in the future "you will not recognize the Catholic Church," Dodd also asserted that:

"In the 1930's, we put eleven hundred men into the priesthood in order to destroy the Church from within."

"Right now they are in the highest places, and they are working to bring about change in order that the Catholic Church will no longer be effective against Communism."

Manning Johnson, a former Communist Party official and author of "Color, Communism and Common Sense" testified in 1953 to the House un-American Activities Committee regarding the infiltration of the Catholic Church:

"Once the tactic of infiltration of religious organizations was set by the Kremlin ... the Communists discovered that the destruction of religion could proceed much faster through infiltration of the (Catholic) Church by Communists operating within the Church itself. The Communist leadership in the United States realized that the infiltration tactic in this country would have to adapt itself to American conditions (Europe also had its cells) and the religious make-up peculiar to this country. In the earliest stages it was determined that with only small forces available to them, it would be necessary to concentrate Communist agents in the seminaries. The practical conclusion drawn by the Red leaders was that these institutions would make it possible for a small Communist minority to influence the ideology of future clergymen in the paths conducive to Communist purposes This policy of infiltrating seminaries was successful beyond even our communist expectations."

As a radio talk show host and avid listener to talk radio in Boston, I've listened intently to comments by Catholics as the crisis has unfolded. Much has been said regarding the left dominance of the seminaries and a prevalence of the ideas of "liberation theology" which is a biblically contradictory Trojan horse within the Catholic gates. Establishment organs, such as the Boston Globe, continue to wring their hands over the homosexual activities of priests while supporting a homosexual agenda everywhere else. Hopefully, the Catholic flock will wake up and sweep the corruption out of their church in the same way that their founder, Jesus of Nazareth, swept the moneychangers out of the Temple.

Page URL: Host Web site:
Yes they did infiltrate is the short answer. See e.g. Catholic Church Infiltrators. They did this with  a lot of other set ups too.


Fabian Society
A bunch of socialists founded in England dedicated to spreading communism. Highly influential in The Labour Party


Gramsci's Grand Plan
However, the hard core of the Communist movement consisted of ruthless criminals, clear-eyed in their understanding of the intellectual errors of Marxism, who were willing to employ any necessary means to obtain the power they sought. For such hardened, hate-intoxicated conspirators, ideology is a tactic, a means of mobilizing supporters and rationalizing criminal actions.

Those who accept uncritically the idea that "Communism is dead" fail to understand the true nature of the enemy. Communism is not an ideology in which one believes. Rather, it is a criminal conspiracy in which one enlists. Although Lenin professed to revere Marx's scribblings as sacred writ, once his Bolsheviks had seized power in Russia, Lenin freely modified Marxism to suit his needs. The same was true of Stalin. The Bolsheviks did not come to power in Russia by any uprising of the workers and peasants, but by a coup d'état [ See the October Revolution ], orchestrated by a tightly disciplined Marxist cadre and ultimately consolidated by civil war. They also received — lest it be forgotten — critical help from Western political and banking elites [ See Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution  ].

Gramsci was a brilliant student of philosophy, history, and languages. This education imparted to him an excellent grasp of the character of his fellow men and of the character of the societies that made up the civilized community of nations in the early decades of this century. As we have already seen, one of the foundational insights given him by this education was that Communist hopes for a spontaneous revolution, brought about by some process of historical inevitability, were illusory. Marxist ideologues were, he asserted, beguiling themselves. In the Gramscian view workers and peasants were not, by and large, revolutionary-minded and they harboured no desire for the destruction of the existing order. Most had loyalties beyond, and far more powerful than, class considerations, even in those instances where their lives were less than ideal. More meaningful to ordinary people than class solidarity and class warfare were such things as faith in God and love of family and country. These were foremost among their overriding allegiances. 
It is worth reading the whole article.


Errors & omissions, broken links, cock ups, over-emphasis, malice [ real or imaginary ] or whatever; if you find any I am open to comment.
Email me at Mike Emery. All financial contributions are cheerfully accepted. If you want to keep it private, use my PGP KeyHome Page

Updated on 22/12/2018 19:16